Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:155–70.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sendyk DI, de Oliveira NK, Pannuti CM, da Graça Naclério-Homem M, Wennerberg A, Deboni MC. Conventional drilling versus piezosurgery for implant site preparation: a meta-analysis. J Oral Implantology. 2018;44(5):400–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chiriac G, Herten M, Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Becker J. Autogenous bone chips: influence of a new piezoelectric device (Piezosurgery) on chip morphology, cell viability and differentiation. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(9):994–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rashad A, Kaiser A, Prochnow N, Schmitz I, Hoffmann E, Maurer P. Heat production during different ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparations for dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1361–136.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baker JA, Vora S, Bairam L, Kim HI, Davis EL, Andreana S. Piezoelectric vs. conventional implant site preparation: an ex vivo implant primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:433–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sirolli M, Mafra CES, dos Santos RAB, Saraiva L, Holzhausen M, Cé́sar Neto JB. Influence of piezosurgery on bone healing around titanium implants: A histological study in rats,” Brazilian Dental Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 278–283, 2016.

Ramli R, Reher P, Harris M, Meghji S. The effect of ultra- sound on angiogenesis: an in vitro study using the chick chorioallantoic membrane. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:591–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scheven BA, Shelton RM, Cooper PR, Walmsley AD, Smith AJ. Therapeutic ultrasound for dental tissue repair. Med Hypotheses. 2009;73:591–3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vercellotti T, Nevins ML, Kim DM, et al. Osseous response following resective therapy with piezosurgery. Int J Peri- odontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:543–9.

Google Scholar 

Preti G, Martinasso G, Peirone B, et al. Cytokines and growth factors involved in the osseointegration of oral titanium implants positioned using piezoelectric bone surgery versus a drill technique: a pilot study in minipigs. J Periodontol. 2007;78:716–22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bengazi F, Lang NP, Canciani E, Viganò P, Velez JU, Botticelli D. Osseointegration of implants with dendrimers surface characteristics installed conventionally or with Piezosurgery. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:10–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li X, Lin X, Guo J, Wang Y. The Stability and Survival Rate of Dental Implants After Preparation of the Site by Piezosurgery vs Conventional Drilling: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2020;35(3).

Peker Tekdal G, Bostanci N, Belibasakis GN, Gürkan A. The effect of piezoelectric surgery implant osteotomy on radiological and molecular parameters of peri-implant crestal bone loss: a randomized, controlled, split-mouth trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:535–44.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bassi F, Cicciù M, Di Lenarda R, Galindo Moreno P, Galli F, Herford AS, Jokstad A, Lombardi T, Nevins M, Sennerby L, Schierano G. Piezoelectric bone surgery compared with conventional rotary instruments in oral surgery and implantology: Summary and consensus statements of the International Piezoelectric Surgery Academy Consensus Conference 2019. Int. J. Oral Implantol. 2020;13:1–5.

Hasan I, Dominiak M, Blaszczyszyn A, Bourauel C, Gedrange T, Heinemann F. Radiographic evaluation of bone density around immediately loaded implants. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger. 2015;199:52–7.

Stelzle F, Frenkel C, Riemann M, Knipfer C, Stockmann P, Nkenke E. The effect of load on heat production, thermal effects and expenditure of time during implant site preparation— an experimental ex vivo comparison between piezosurgery and conventional drilling. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(2):e140–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stelzle F, Neukam FW, Nkenke E. Load-dependent heat development, thermal effects, duration, and soft tissue preservation in piezosurgical implant site preparation: an experimental ex vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(3):513–22.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Makary C, Rebaudi A, Demircioglu A, Lahoud P, Naaman N. Standard Drilling Versus Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation: a clinical study at 4 weeks after insertion of conical implants. Im- plant Dent. 2017;26:547–52.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gurkan A, Tekdal GP, Bostanci N, Belibasakis GN. Cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor levels in peri-implant sulcus during wound healing and osseointegration after piezosurgical versus conventional implant site preparation: Randomized, controlled, split-mouth trial. J Periodontol. 2019;90:616–26.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ponzoni D, Martins F, Conforte JJ, Egas LS, Tonini KR, de Car- valho PSP. Evaluation of immediate cell viability and repair of osteotomies for implants using drills and piezosurgery. A randomized, prospective, and controlled rabbit study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;1–11.

Stacchi C, Vercellotti T, Torelli L, Furlan F, Di Lenarda R. Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: twist drills versus piezosurgery. A single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Apr;15(2):188–97.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Canullo L, Peñarrocha D, Peñarrocha M, Rocio AG, Diago MP. Piezoelectric vs. conventional drilling in implant site preparation: pilot controlled randomized clinical trial with crossover design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:1336–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schlee M, Steigmann M, Bratu E, Garg AK. Piezosurgery: basics and possibilities. Implant Dent. 2006;12:334–40.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stelzle F, Frenkel C, Riemann M, Knipfer C, Stockmann P, Nkenke E. The effect of load on heat production, thermal effects and expenditure of time during implant site preparation - an experimental ex vivo comparison between piezosurgery and conventional drilling. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:e140–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sagheb K, Kumar VV, Azaripour A, Walter C, Al-Nawas B, Kämmerer PW. Comparison of conventional twist drill protocol and piezosur- gery for implant insertion: an ex vivo study on different bone types. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:207–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Baldi D, Bugea C, Rapani A, Perinetti G, Itri A, Carpita D, Audenino G, Bianco G, Verardi S. Immediate loading of implant-supported single crowns after conventional and ultrasonic implant site preparation: a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. BioMed Research International. 2018 Aug 14;2018.

Stacchi C, Bassi F, Troiano G, Rapani A, Lombardi T, Jokstad A, Sennerby L, Schierano G. Piezoelectric bone surgery for implant site preparation compared with conventional drilling techniques: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Merheb J, Temmerman A, Rasmusson L, Kübler A, Thor A, Quirynen M. Influence of skeletal and local bone density on dental implant stability in patients with osteoporosis. Clin implant dentistry Relat Res. 2016;18(2):253–60.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gursoytrak B, Ataoglu H. Use of resonance frequency analysis to evaluate the effects of surface properties on the stability of different implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(3):239–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Godoy-Reina I, Moreu-Burgos G, González-Jaranay M. Stability and marginal bone loss in implants placed using piezoelectric osteotomy versus conventional drilling: systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicina oral, Patología oral y Cirugía Bucal. 2021;26(2):e226.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

da Neto S, Tavares U, Joly JC, Gehrke SA. Clinical analysis of the stability of dental implants after preparation of the site by conventional drilling or piezosurgery. Br J Oral Maxillofacial. 2014;52(2):149–53.

Article  Google Scholar 

Malizos KN, Hantes ME, Protopappas V, Papachristos A. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for bone healing: an overview. Injury. 2006;37(Suppl. 1):56–62.

Article  Google Scholar 

Li JK, Lin JC, Liu HC, Ruaan RC, Shih C, Chang WH. Comparison of ultrasound and electromagnetic field effects on osteoblast growth. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32:769–75.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Botticelli S, Verna C, Cattaneo PM, Heidmann J, Melsen B. Two-versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines. Eur J Orthodontics. 2011;33(4):344–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Soardi CM, Zaffe D, Motroni A, Wang HL. Quantitative comparison of cone beam computed tomography and microradiography in the evaluation of bone density after maxillary sinus augmentation: a preliminary study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(4):557–64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Di Alberti L, Donnini F, Di Alberti C, Camerino M. A comparative study of bone densitometry during osseointegration: piezoelectric surgery versus rotary protocols. Quintessence Int. 2010;41(8).

Marquezan M, Osório A, Sant’Anna E, Souza MM, Maia L. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(7):767–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Degidi M, Perrotti V, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. Mineralized bone-implant contact and implant stability quotient in 16 human implants retrieved after early healing periods: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2010;25(1).

Al-Jamal MFJ, Al-Jumaily HA. Can the bone density estimated by CBCT predict the Primary Stability of Dental Implants? A New Measurement Protocol. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):e171–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar