Impact of Mediating and Confounding Variables on the Volume–Outcome Association in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280(20):1747–51.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–37.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu Q, Zhao Z, Zhang X, et al. Perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in low-risk surgical candidates: a multicenter propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg. 2021.

Zureikat AH, Beane JD, Zenati MS, et al. 500 minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of optimizing performance. Ann Surg. 2021;273(5):966–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hue JJ, Sugumar K, Markt SC, et al. Facility volume–survival relationship in patients with early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2021;170(1):207–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Merath K, Mehta R, Tsilimigras DI, et al. In-hospital mortality following pancreatoduodenectomy: a comprehensive analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(5):1119–26.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kagedan DJ, Goyert N, Li Q, et al. The impact of increasing hospital volume on 90-day postoperative outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(3):506–15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

O’Mahoney PRA, Yeo HL, Sedrakyan A, et al. Centralization of pancreatoduodenectomy a decade later: impact of the volume–outcome relationship. Surgery. 2016;159(6):1528–38.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Krautz C, Nimptsch U, Weber GF, Mansky T, Grützmann R. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital morbidity and mortality following pancreatic surgery in Germany. Ann Surg. 2018;267(3):411–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ryan CE, Wood TW, Ross SB, Smart AE, Sukharamwala PB, Rosemurgy AS. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Florida: do 20-year trends document the salutary benefits of centralization of care? HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(9):832–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maegawa FB, Ashouri Y, Bartz-Kurycki M, et al. Impact of facility type on survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for small pancreatic adenocarcinoma (≤ 2 cm). Am J Surg. 2021;222(1):145–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Watson MD, Miller-Ocuin JL, Driedger MR, et al. Factors associated with treatment and survival of early stage pancreatic cancer in the era of modern chemotherapy: an analysis of the National Cancer Database. J Pancreat Cancer. 2020;6(1):85–95.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lidsky ME, Sun Z, Nussbaum DP, Adam MA, Speicher PJ, Blazer DG 3rd. Going the extra mile: improved survival for pancreatic cancer patients traveling to high-volume centers. Ann Surg. 2017;266(2):333–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wasif N, Chang YH, Pockaj BA, Gray RJ, Mathur A, Etzioni D. Association of distance traveled for surgery with short- and long-term cancer outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(11):3444–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hunger R, Mantke R. Outcome quality beyond the mean - an analysis of 43,231 pancreatic surgical procedures related to hospital volume. Ann Surg. 2022;276:159–66.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fry BT, Smith ME, Thumma JR, Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB. Ten-year trends in surgical mortality, complications, and failure to rescue in medicare beneficiaries. Ann Surg. 2020;271(5):855–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Healy MA, Krell RW, Abdelsattar ZM, et al. Pancreatic resection results in a statewide surgical collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(8):2468–74.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Binkley CE, Kemp DS. Ethical centralization of high-risk surgery requires racial and economic justice. Ann Surg. 2020;272(6):917–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blanco BA, Kothari AN, Blackwell RH, et al. “Take the Volume Pledge” may result in disparity in access to care. Surgery. 2017;161(3):837–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bliss LA, Yang CJ, Chau Z, et al. Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits? HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(10):899–906.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zafar SN, Shah AA, Channa H, Raoof M, Wilson L, Wasif N. Comparison of rates and outcomes of readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(8):719–27.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–90.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Song Y, Shannon AB, Concors SJ, et al. Are volume pledge standards worth the travel burden for major abdominal cancer operations? Ann Surg. 2022;275:e743–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Austin PC. Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis. Stat Med. 2016;35(30):5642–55.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015;34(28):3661–79.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Funk MJ, Westreich D, Wiesen C, Stürmer T, Brookhart MA, Davidian M. Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(7):761–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ali MS, Prieto-Alhambra D, Lopes LC, et al. Propensity score methods in health technology assessment: principles, extended applications, and recent advances. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:973.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yu Q, Wu X, Li B, Scribner RA. Multiple mediation analysis with survival outcomes: With an application to explore racial disparity in breast cancer survival. Stat Med. 2019;38(3):398–412.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci. 2000;1(4):173–81.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Urbach DR. Pledging to eliminate low-volume surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(15):1388–90.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fong ZV, Loehrer AP, Fernández-Del Castillo C, et al. Potential impact of a volume pledge on spatial access: a population-level analysis of patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Surgery. 2017;162(2):203–10.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson AN, Nease RF Jr. Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care. 1999;37(2):204–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Macedo FIB, Jayanthi P, Mowzoon M, Yakoub D, Dudeja V, Merchant N. The impact of surgeon volume on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(10):1723–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sheetz KH, Nuliyalu U, Nathan H, Sonnenday CJ. Association of surgeon case numbers of pancreaticoduodenectomies vs related procedures with patient outcomes to inform volume-based credentialing. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(4):e203850.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

de Geus SWL, Hachey KJ, Nudel JD, et al. Volume of pancreas-adjacent operations favorably influences pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes at lower volume pancreas centers. Ann Surg. 2022;276:e102–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Acher AW, Weber SM, Pawlik TM. Does the volume–outcome association in pancreas cancer surgery justify regionalization of care? A review of current controversies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29:1257–68.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif