IJERPH, Vol. 19, Pages 16138: Association between Exposure to Particulate Matter Air Pollution during Early Childhood and Risk of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Taiwan

1. IntroductionAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental spectrum disorder that has shown a notable increase in incidence over most recent decades. Current epidemiological figures show that ADHD is the most common behavioral disorder in children, affecting approximately 2–7% of children globally [1]. However, data suggest substantial geographical and ethnic variations in the burden of ADHD, with a higher ADHD prevalence in North America than in Europe, but showing no statistical significance between different Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders editions [2]. In East Asian countries, such as China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, the prevalence of ADHD is 6.5%, 6.4%, and 4.2%, respectively [3]. ADHD generally develops in preschool and younger children, and tends to show a male predominance. This disorder is characterized by impaired attention, impulsivity, and overactivity, leading to risk-taking behavior, learning difficulties, disorganization, and difficulty completing tasks [4]. Moreover, when the condition persists into adulthood, it can result in a wide range of mental and social difficulties, such as impaired decision-making, antisocial behaviors, emotional dysregulation, employment difficulties, and psychiatric disorders [5,6,7]. Thus, search is ongoing to identify the risk factors and determinants of ADHD to minimize its long-term negative impacts on the development, daily activities, and quality of life of patients and their families.Although the exact pathogenic mechanisms leading to ADHD are still poorly understood, several genetic and environmental risk factors have been implicated in the development of ADHD-related behavioral abnormalities [8,9]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have shown that genetic susceptibility and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly increase the risk of ADHD and symptom distribution [10,11,12,13]. Furthermore, in well-controlled trials, environmental factors linked to the risk of ADHD have been identified, including pollutants, low birth weight, advanced maternal age, socioeconomic factors, and psychological deprivation [14]. Recently, a growing number of studies have investigated the effect of air pollution on the risk of ADHD and have provided evidence of a strong correlation between higher air pollution exposure and ADHD development. In large population-based studies, exposure to particulate matter (PM) and ambient gases in early life significantly increased the risk of ADHD, suggesting a significant role of these parameters in triggering the dysregulation of neurotransmitters and functional abnormalities in the front striatal region [15,16,17].PM, defined as “a complex mixture of extremely small solid particles and liquid droplets that enter air. Once inhaled, these particles can affect the heart and lungs and cause serious health effects”, is a major component of indoor and outdoor air pollution [18]. Along with aerosols and solid particles, PM usually contains toxic chemicals that can exert hazardous health effects [19]. These particles include PM2.5 and PM10, classified according to their aerodynamic diameter. PM10 is defined as PM with a diameter of less than or equal to 10 μm; this pollution can be absorbed by alveoli into the bloodstream and distributed to several organs. PM2.5 is defined as PM with a diameter of less than or equal to 2.5 μm; this pollution can induce cardiopulmonary impairments and/or disorders, and, thus, poses a significant risk to health. A cumulative body of evidence has shown that PM (PM2.5 or PM10) significantly contributes to the development of a wide range of human diseases, including cardiovascular disorders, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pollen allergy, cognitive impairment, malignancy, and all-cause mortality [19,20,21].To date, several reports have investigated the association between PM exposure (PM10 or PM2.5) and ADHD [22,23,24]; however, only the impact of PM exposure (PM10 and PM2.5) in early life has been reported in the literature. In addition, most studies were conducted in Europe, which has a relatively lower PM2.5 concentration than Asia, and these studies did not investigate the dose–response relationship between PM10 or PM2.5 and ADHD. Thus, in this population-based study, we assessed the relationship between early-life exposure to PM10 or PM2.5 and ADHD. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Data Source

The National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) contains the medical records, drug information, inspection data, etc., of the people of Taiwan, and, thus, can serve as an important research resource. Disease coding in this database follows the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Tenth Revision, and Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM). The present study used data from the NHIRD, which includes a population of two million. The Taiwan Air Quality-Monitoring Database (TAQMD) contains daily concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 from 1998 to 2018, and is maintained by the Environmental Protection Administration Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). The TAQMD includes 74 air quality monitoring stations, which were established based on population density in Taiwan. The two databases were merged according to the living area of the insured and the location of the air quality monitoring station. Each participant was assigned pollutant exposure concentrations based on the data collected from the monitoring station located in their living area.

This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Research Ethics Committee of the China Medical University Hospital (CMUH109-REC2-031(CR-2)).

2.2. Study Population, Outcome, and Comorbidities

We investigated the population under the age of 18 in 2003 and living in areas with air quality monitoring stations. The study period began in 2003 and ended in 2017. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (ICD-9-CM:314; ICD-10-CM: F90) was defined in participants having two or more outpatient diagnoses or one admission record. We calculated the annual average amount of air pollutants each subject was exposed to during the follow-up period. The quartiles of each air pollutant were: PM2.5 (Q1: <25.5 μg/m3, Q2: 25.5–26.4 μg/m3, Q3: 26.5–34.2 μg/m3, Q4: >34.2 μg/m3) and PM10 (Q1: < 46.0 μg/m3, Q2: 46.0–50.7 μg/m3, Q3: 50.8–60.4 μg/m3, Q4: >60.4 μg/m3). Related comorbidities, such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis, were considered covariates.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The variables sex, age, urbanization level, comorbidities, and ADHD were presented as counts and percentages. Variables related to environmental factors, including temperature and air pollutants PM2.5 and PM10, were expressed as the mean and standard deviations. The incidence of ADHD per 1000 person-years was calculated. To reveal the association between air pollutants and ADHD in children aged younger than 18 years, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the risk of ADHD. The incidence rate of ADHD was estimated according to different pollutant levels.

A multivariable model adjusted for covariates was used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the association between the risk of ADHD and PM exposure. Cumulative incidence curves of ADHD were further drawn using the Kaplan–Meier method. Curves were evaluated using the log-rank test. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The statistical significance was set at 0.05.

3. ResultsAs shown in Table 1, our study sample consisted of 98,177 participants, 49.3% of whom were female and 50.7% were male. The mean age was 9.66 (±4.27) years, and the highest urbanization level (level one) accounted for 61.4% of the total. Furthermore, 21.4% of patients had the comorbidities of asthma, 9.91% had atopic dermatitis (AD), and 56.2% had allergic rhinitis (AR). The mean temperature was approximately 23.6 (±1.35). The mean annual PM2.5 and PM10 exposures during the participation period were 29.3 (±7.15) μg/m3 and 53.6 (±12.1) μg/m3, respectively. Ultimately, 2856 participants developed ADHD. The mean follow-up time was 14.7 (±1.86) years.Table 2 presents the incidence rates and hazard ratios (95% CI) of ADHD for PM2.5 and PM10 stratified into quartiles. The incidence rates of ADHD for the four quartiles of the PM2.5 level were 1.15 (Q1), 0.22 (Q2), 2.25 (Q3), and 2.03 (Q4). The crude HR (95% CI) of ADHD in Q2 of PM2.5 exposure was 0.19 (0.15, 0.25). Patients in Q3 (cHR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.75, 2.19) and Q4 (cHR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.56, 1.99) had a higher risk of ADHD. The incidence rates of ADHD in the four quartiles of the PM10 level were 1.45 (Q1), 1.39 (Q2), 2.87 (Q3), and 2.30 (Q4). For PM10 pollutants, the subjects in the Q3 level had a 1.96-fold risk of ADHD (95% CI = 1.77, 2.18) and the subjects in the Q4 level had a 1.58-fold risk of ADHD (95% CI = 1.42, 1.76).Table 3 shows the results of two multivariable models of ADHD, which were adjusted for age, gender, asthma, and AD, with one additionally adjusted for PM2.5 and the other one for PM10. The greater the age of the participants, the lower the risk of ADHD. In the first model with PM2.5, the risk factors of ADHD included male gender (aHR = 2.98; 95% CI = 2.70, 3.29), asthma (aHR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.13, 1.37), AD (aHR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.00, 1.28), the Q3 group of PM2.5 (aHR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.70, 2.13), and the Q4 group of PM2.5 (aHR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.13, 1.37). Children in the Q2 level of PM2.5 (aHR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.15, 0.26) had a lower risk of ADHD than those in the Q1 level. For the other model with PM10, male gender (aHR = 3.22; 95% CI = 2.95, 3.51), asthma (aHR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.11, 1.32), and exposure to high levels of PM10 (Q3: aHR = 2.02; 95% CI = 1.82, 2.25; Q4: aHR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.37, 1.70) all increased the risk of ADHD. The aHR of ADHD for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) relative to AR-free patients was 0.84 (95% CI = 0.78, 0.91).As shown in Figure 1, the Q3 and Q4 levels of PM2.5 had a relatively high cumulative incidence of ADHD, and the Q2 level of PM2.5 had a relatively low cumulative incidence of ADHD when considering the Q1 level of PM2.5 as a reference (the p-value of the log-rank test was 10 was shown. 4. DiscussionThe association between airborne PM (PM10 and PM2.5) exposure and human diseases is well-established in the literature [25]. Several regulatory guidelines exist to minimize indoor and outdoor air pollution, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and European Union (EU) air quality guidelines [26]. Unfortunately, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated a significant association between PM exposure and a wide range of disorders, highlighting the suboptimal implementation of these guidelines and the need to reconsider new thresholds for the maximum daily concentration of PM exposure [24]. ADHD is a neurobiological spectrum disorder with multiple underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and several genetic, environmental, and anatomical factors [27]. Researchers have suggested that prenatal and early life exposure to PM significantly increases the risk of ADHD. However, most studies were conducted in Europe and did not simultaneously assess exposure to PM10 and PM2.5. Thus, in this population-based study, we assessed the relationship between early-life exposure to PM10 or PM2.5 and ADHD in a Taiwanese population.Our analysis confirmed the association between higher daily exposure to PM10 or PM2.5 in early life and the risk of ADHD. We found that, compared with the lower concentrations, the higher concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 were significantly associated with a higher incidence of ADHD. These associations remained significant after controlling for age, sex, urbanization level, and comorbidities. In line with our findings, a systematic review of 28 studies by Aghaei et al. reported a significant association between ADHD and higher exposure to air pollutants, including PM10 and PM2.5 [15]. Another study also found positive associations between prenatal and postnatal exposure to PM2.5 and ADHD [22]. In a cohort study in South Korea, every 1 μg/m3 increase in exposure to PM10 resulted in a two-fold increased risk of ADHD [23]. Exposure to PM10 was reported to possibly be a risk factor for worsening ADHD symptoms, resulting in hospitalization [28]. These findings are in line with reports from Mexico, Spain, and India, showing a significant association between exposure to PM and cognitive impairment, low school performance, reduced attention, and behavioral problems [29,30,31]. In this study, the relationship between PM exposure and the risk of ADHD may not have been a dose–response effect; thus, there may be a potential threshold. Further animal or experimental studies are required to confirm these results.The exact mechanistic approaches underpinning the association between PM exposure and ADHD remain unclear. PM2.5 can induce oxidative stress [32], transduce proinflammatory signals from the cardiopulmonary and hepatic systems to the central nervous system [33], and penetrate the BBB to initiate neuroinflammation [34]. PM2.5 generated from diesel exhausts is even more toxic, because these air pollutants can absorb polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and nitro-substituted PAHs (nitro-PAHs), which both enhance inflammatory responses [35]. PM10 can trigger the release of proinflammatory cytokines [36], while PM10 and PM2.5 can both damage dopaminergic cells [37,38]. Therefore, it is hypothesized that inhaled PM10 and PM2.5, which can be distributed to various organs, including the brain, via the nasal olfactory mucosa [39], trigeminal nerve route [40], and circulation [33], directly or indirectly induce neurotoxicity, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress, eventually leading to an increased risk of neurobehavioral disorders.However, it is worth noting that the current literature shows conflicting results regarding the association between PM exposure and the risk of ADHD. In a recent systematic review by Zhang et al., PM exposure was not significantly associated with a significant increase in the risk of ADHD; the pooled analysis showed substantial heterogeneity [41]. Likewise, a birth cohort study of seven European countries showed no significant association between PM2.5 exposure during pregnancy and ADHD [42]. A cohort study from Sweden further reported similar results regarding exposure to PM10 [43]. In our opinion, several factors could explain the discrepancies between our results and those obtained in the European population. First, Europe has relatively lower PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations than Asia; thus, the difference in the exposure to PM between ADHD and non-ADHD individuals may be too small to detect statistical differences. Methodologically, published reports have utilized different exposure assessment tools and diagnostic criteria for ADHD, leading to substantial variability in the estimation or results. On the other hand, ADHD is a multifactorial disorder, and several confounders may contribute to disease development. It is challenging to control for all potential confounders using population-based registries that affect the association between PM exposure and ADHD. Furthermore, the components of air pollution are extraordinarily heterogeneous; hence, the association between PM and ADHD may be attributed to the synergistic effect of the mixture of pollutants, such as NO2, PAHs, and nitro-PAHs, rather than solely to PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations.

To our knowledge, only a few studies have investigated the dose-dependent relationship between early-life exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 with ADHD. This study collected data from a prospectively collected population-based database, which enhanced the generalizability of our findings. We further explored the association between PM exposure and ADHD after controlling for potential confounders, such as age and socioeconomic status. More importantly, we assessed PM exposure using both temporal and spatial resolution to reduce the risk of exposure misclassification. Additionally, patients were followed-up with for an average of 14.7 years.

Despite its several strengths, we acknowledge the limitations of this study. Firstly, data were retrieved from electronic medical records, which increased the risk of misclassification bias, particularly with a spectrum disorder such as ADHD, in which the diagnosis is challenging due to the substantial variations in presenting symptoms and the extent of impairment. Although we collected data on potential confounders, we could not obtain data regarding ADHD phenotypes and genetic risk factors, precluding the assessment of gene–phenotype–environment interactions. In addition, data regarding other pollutants, such as noise pollution and NO2, were not captured; thus, we could not exclude possible interactions with other factors that may have influenced the association between ADHD and PM exposure. Moreover, data regarding relocation during the follow-up period were unavailable; hence, we could not account for changes in PM exposure according to residential relocation. Consequently, we enrolled 98,177 children in this nationwide study. The residential address was not available from the NHIRD. However, the nonresidential geographic contexts (where air pollution affects people) could lead to erroneous exposure assessments [44,45,46]. Most of the participants were preschool and primary school children (mean age, 9.66 ± 4.27 years). Thus, the impact of the neighborhood effect averaging might have been minimized.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif