Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleas F, Nordal HJ, Abdelnoor M, Magnaes B (1995) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1178–1186. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199505150-00013

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bouknaitir JB, Carreon LY, Brorson S, Pedersen CF, Andersen MO (2021) Wide laminectomy, segmental bilateral laminotomies, or unilateral hemi-laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: five-year patient-reported outcomes in Propensity-matched cohorts. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 46:1509–1515. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004043

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bresnahan L, Ogden AT, Natarajan RN, Fessler RG (2009) A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318191438b

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cavusoglu H, Kaya RA, Turkmenoglu ON, Tuncer C, Colak I, Aydin Y (2007) Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study. Eur Spine J 16:2133–2142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0471-2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Costa F, Ottardi C, Volkheimer D, Ortolina A, Bassani T, Wilke HJ, Galbusera F (2018) Bone-preserving decompression procedures have a minor effect on the flexibility of the lumbar spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 61:680–688. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2018.0023

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Costa F, Sassi M, Cardia A, Ortolina A, De Santis A, Luccarell G, Fornari M (2007) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression. J Neurosurg Spine 7:579–586. https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI-07/12/579

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Datta G, Gnanalingham KK, Peterson D, Mendoza N, O’Neill K, Van Dellen J, McGregor A, Hughes SP (2004) Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction? Neurosurgery 54:1413–1420. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000124751.57121.a6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

den Boogert HF, Keers JC, Marinus Oterdoom DL, Kuijlen JM (2015) Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction. J Neurosurg Spine 23:326–335. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.SPINE13994

Article  Google Scholar 

Deyo RA, Ciol MA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ (1993) Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1463–1470

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG (2010) Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303:1259–1265. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.338

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Evans JG (1964) Neurogenic intermittent claudication. Br Med J 2:985–987. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5415.985

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgström F, Fritzell P, Öhagen P, Michaëlsson K, Sandén B (2016) A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 374:1413–1423. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1513721

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fox MW, Onofrio BM, Onofrio BM, Hanssen AD (1996) Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone. J Neurosurg 85:793–802. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.85.5.0793

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gurelik M, Bozkina C, Kars Z, Karadag O, Ozum U, Bayrakli F (2012) Unilateral laminotomy for decompression of lumbar stenosis is effective and safe: a prospective randomized comparative study. J Neurol Sci 29:744–753

Google Scholar 

Heo DH, Lee DC, Park CK (2019) Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery. Neurosurg Focus 46:E9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS197

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Herno A, Saari T, Suomalainen O, Airaksinen O (1999) The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1010–1014. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199905150-00015

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hong SW, Choi KY, Ahn Y, Baek OK, Wang JC, Lee SH, Lee HY (2011) A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4–L5 spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E172-178. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181db998c

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hopp E, Tsou PM (1988) Postdecompression lumbar instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:143–151

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Horan J, Husien MB, Bolger C (2021) Bilateral laminotomy through a unilateral approach (minimally invasive) versus open laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Br J Neurosurg 35:161–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2020.1777253

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Johnsson KE, Willner S, Johnsson K (1986) Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 11:107–110. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198603000-00001

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khoo LT, Fessler RG (2002) Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 51:S146-154

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim HS, Choi SH, Shim DM, Lee IS, Oh YK, Woo YH (2020) Advantages of new endoscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) over conventional microscopic ULBD. Clin Orthop Surg 12:330–336. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios19136

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ko S, Oh T (2019) Comparison of bilateral decompression via unilateral laminotomy and conventional laminectomy for single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis regarding low back pain, functional outcome, and quality of life—a randomized controlled. Prospect Trial J Orthop Surg Res 14:252. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1298-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Lee CW, Yoon KJ, Ha SS (2019) Comparative analysis between three different lumbar decompression techniques (microscopic, tubular, and endoscopic) in lumbar canal and lateral recess stenosis: preliminary report. Biomed Res Int 2019:6078469. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6078469

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee CW, Yoon KJ, Kim SW (2019) Percutaneous endoscopic decompression in lumbar canal and lateral recess stenosis—the surgical learning curve. Neurospine 16:63–71. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1938048.024

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Leone A, Guglielmi G, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Bonomo L (2007) Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review. Radiology 245:62–77. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2451051359

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu X, Yuan S, Tian Y (2013) Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E732-737. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828fc84c

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lv B, Sun S, Wang H, Xiao L, Xu T, Ji P, Yuan J, Ding H, Xie J, Meng N, Zhang L, Hu M, Jiang Q, Wang L, Yao X (2020) Clinical efficacy and rehabilitation of microscopic “Over the Top” for bilateral decompression in degenerative lumbar stenosis: a retrospective study. Biomed Res Int 2020:7174354. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7174354

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Malter AD, McNeney B, Loeser JD, Deyo RA (1998) 5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:814–820. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199804010-00015

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ, Mooney V, Barnes D, Judge L, Smith S, Terry A (1989) Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:33–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198901000-00006

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Min WK, Kim JE, Choi DJ, Park EJ, Heo J (2020) Clinical and radiological outcomes between biportal endoscopic decompression and microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop Sci 25:371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2019.05.022

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mobbs RJ, Li J, Sivabalan P, Raley D, Rao PJ (2014) Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 21:179–186. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE13420

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Overdevest G, Vleggeert-Lankamp C, Jacobs W, Thomé C, Gunzburg R, Peul W (2015) Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis. Eur Spine J 24:2244–2263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4098-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Postacchini F, Cinotti G, Perugia D, Gumina S (1993) The surgical treatment of central lumbar stenosis. Multiple laminotomy compared with total laminectomy. J Bone Jt Surg Br 75:386–392. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.75B3.8496205

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sairyo K, Sakai T, Higashino K, Inoue M, Yasui N, Dezawa A (2010) Complications of endoscopic lumbar decompression surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 53:175–178. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262814

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A (1993) Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:575–581.