Implementing guidelines for risk-stratified thromboprophylaxis among gynecologic oncology patients: A quality improvement initiative

ElsevierVolume 168, January 2023, Pages 144-150Gynecologic OncologyAuthor links open overlay panelHighlights•

Adherence to guidelines for risk-stratified thromboprophylaxis during outpatient systemic treatment remains limited.

Standardized algorithmic documentation increased adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines.

Among patients receiving thromboprophylaxis, no differences in rates of venous thromboembolism or bleedingwere observed.

AbstractObjective(s)

Risk-stratified thromboprophylaxis is recommended for oncology patients with a Khorana risk score (KS) ≥ 2 receiving cancer-directed therapy. We describe a quality improvement (QI) initiative designed to increase adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines for patients with gynecologic malignancies initiating outpatient treatment.

Methods

Provider awareness and documentation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis eligibility were identified as key QI drivers. Starting May 2021, a KS calculator and thromboprophylaxis algorithm were incorporated into outpatient documentation templates. Patients with gynecologic malignancies initiating outpatient therapy from January – December 2021 were eligible. The primary process measure was the percentage of patients with KS eligibility documented each month during the baseline (Jan – Apr) versus implementation (May – Dec) periods. Rate of appropriate thromboprophylaxis initiation and incidence of VTE served as outcome measures. Incidence of adverse bleeding events served as the balancing measure.

Results

337 patients accounted for the initiation of 383 treatment regimens, including 128 in the baseline period and 255 in the implementation period. KS documentation increased significantly between the baseline and implementation periods (7% vs 62.4%, p < 0.001). 73 of the 177 eligible patients (46.2%; 166 unique patients) had appropriate documentation; of these, 57 initiated thromboprophylaxis. There was no difference in VTE rates or adverse bleeding events between eligible patients who initiated thromboprophylaxis compared with those who did not (12.3% vs 15.6%; p = 0.65 and 7.0% vs 8.2%; p = 1.0, respectively).

Conclusion(s)

This QI initiative resulted in greater adherence to risk-stratified thromboprophylaxis guidelines. No bleeding signals were identified. Studies addressing cost, medication adherence, and long-term outcomes are necessary.

Keywords

Thromboprophylaxis

Chemotherapy

Khorana score

Quality improvement

View full text

© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif