Cozzolino M, Busnelli A, Pellegrini L, Riviello E, Vitagliano A. How vitamin D level influences in vitro fertilization outcomes: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(5):1014–25.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, Coomarasamy A. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(2):202–23.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Werner MD, Upham KM, Treff NR, Scott RT Jr. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):656-663.e1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bassil R, Casper R, Samara N, Hsieh TB, Barzilay E, Orvieto R, Haas J. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(7):1301–5.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lessey BA, Young SL. What exactly is endometrial receptivity? Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):611–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iyoke CA, Ugwu GO, Ezugwu FO, Ajah LO, Mba SG. The role of ultrasonography in in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Niger J Med. 2013;22(3):162–70.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alcazar JL. Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;4:56.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhu W, Chen M, Liu J, Fu Z, Li X, Qin C, Liu D, Tang X. Receptivity assessment of an ultrasonographic homogeneous endometrium in the late follicular phase of infertile women with natural cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(6):511.e1-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wear KA. Mechanisms of interaction of ultrasound with cancellous bone: a review. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020;67(3):454–82.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Embryology ASiRMaESIGo. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(6):1270–83.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gardner DK, Surrey E, Minjarez D, Leitz A, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(3):551–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, Sullivan E, Vanderpoel S, International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive T, World Health O. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1520–4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

El-Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, Khairy M, Sunkara K, Seed P, Khalaf Y, Braude P. The relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of medicated frozen embryo replacement cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):832–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu KE, Hartman M, Hartman A, Luo ZC, Mahutte N. The impact of a thin endometrial lining on fresh and frozen-thaw IVF outcomes: an analysis of over 40 000 embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(10):1883–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Haas J, Smith R, Zilberberg E, Nayot D, Meriano J, Barzilay E, Casper RF. Endometrial compaction (decreased thickness) in response to progesterone results in optimal pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 2019;112(3):503–509. e1

Jin Z, Shi H, Lu M, Bu Z, Huo M, Zhang Y. Endometrial thickness changes after progesterone administration do not affect the pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(6):1502–12.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zollner U, Zollner KP, Specketer MT, Blissing S, Muller T, Steck T, Dietl J. Endometrial volume as assessed by three-dimensional ultrasound is a predictor of pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(6):1515–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang J, Xia F, Zhou Y, Wei X, Zhuang Y, Huang Y. Association Between Endometrial/Subendometrial Vasculature and Embryo Transfer Outcome: A Meta-analysis and Subgroup Analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(1):149–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hershko-Klement A, Tepper R. Ultrasound in assisted reproduction: a call to fill the endometrial gap. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(6):1394-1402.e4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

DeLancey JO. What’s new in the functional anatomy of pelvic organ prolapse? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28(5):420–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Egbase PE, Al-Sharhan M, Grudzinskas JG. Influence of position and length of uterus on implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in IVF and embryo transfer treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(9):1943–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang L, Zhao Z, Wen J, Ling W, Miao Y, Wu J. Cellular senescence: a pathogenic mechanism of pelvic organ prolapse (Review). Mol Med Rep. 2020;22(3):2155–62.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Eytan O, Elad D, Jaffa AJ. Evaluation of the embryo transfer protocol by a laboratory model of the uterus. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(2):485–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ficicioglu C, Ozcan P, Kocer MG, Yesiladali M, Alagoz O, Ozkara G, Tayyar AT, Altunok C. Effect of air bubbles localization and migration after embryo transfer on assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(2):310-314.e1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tiras B, Korucuoglu U, Polat M, Saltik A, Zeyneloglu HB, Yarali H. Effect of air bubble localization after transfer on embryo transfer outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;164(1):52–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Greer WJ, Richter HE, Bartolucci AA, Burgio KL. Obesity and pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(2 Pt 1):341–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Swan SH, Sathyanarayana S, Barrett ES, Janssen S, Liu F, Nguyen RH, Redmon JB, Team TS. First trimester phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in newborns. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(4):963–72.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Toprak T, Tokat E. Does anogenital distance change with age? Andrologia. 2019;51(11):e13431.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar