Prognostic models for COVID-19 needed updating to warrant transportability over time and space

Nkengasong J, Iwasaki A, Victora C, Oh J, Gao GF, Agrawal A, et al. The global response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Med (N Y). 2020;1(1):3–8.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus. Accessed 18 Oct 2022.

Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054–62.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Clarification of mortality rate and data in abstract, results, and table 2. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2098.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cazeau N. Social Isolation: Managing Psychological Distress in Hospitalized Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2020;24(5):472–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wynants L, Van Calster B, Collins GS, Riley RD, Heinze G, Schuit E, et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ. 2020;369:m1328.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lombardi Y, Azoyan L, Szychowiak P, Bellamine A, Lemaitre G, Bernaux M, et al. External validation of prognostic scores for COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study of patients hospitalized in Greater Paris University Hospitals. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(12):1426–39.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Van Calster B, McLernon DJ, van Smeden M, Wynants L, Steyerberg EW. Calibration: The Achilles heel of predictive analytics. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):230.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Van Calster B, Vickers AJ. Calibration of risk prediction models: impact on decision-analytic performance. Med Decis Mak. 2015;35(2):162–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gulati G, Upshaw J, Wessler BS, Brazil RJ, Nelson J, van Klaveren D, et al. Generalizability of cardiovascular disease clinical prediction models: 158 independent external validations of 104 unique models. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022;15(4):e008487.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Barouch DH. COVID-19 vaccines — immunity, variants, boosters. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(11):1011–20.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines. National Institutes of Health. Available at https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/. Accessed 18 October 2022.

Levy TJ, Richardson S, Coppa K, Barnaby DP, McGinn T, Becker LB, et al. Development and validation of a survival calculator for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. medRxiv. 2020:2020.04.22.20075416. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.22.20075416.

van Klaveren D, Rekkas A, Alsma J, Verdonschot R, Koning D, Kamps MJA, et al. COVID outcome prediction in the emergency department (COPE): using retrospective Dutch hospital data to develop simple and valid models for predicting mortality and need for intensive care unit admission in patients who present at the emergency department with suspected COVID-19. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):e051468.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2020. URL http://www.R-project.org/.

Van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011;45(3):1–67.

Article  Google Scholar 

van Klaveren D, Gonen M, Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. A new concordance measure for risk prediction models in external validation settings. Stat Med. 2016;35(23):4136–52.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Harrell FE. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001.

Book  Google Scholar 

Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Mak. 2006;26(6):565–74.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wessler BS, Nelson J, Park JG, McGinnes H, Gulati G, Brazil R, et al. External Validations of Cardiovascular Clinical Prediction Models: A Large-Scale Review of the Literature. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021;14(8):e007858.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Moons KGM, Wolff RF, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, et al. PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(1):W1–w33.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schnellinger EM, Yang W, Kimmel SE. Comparison of dynamic updating strategies for clinical prediction models. Diagn Progn Res. 2021;5(1):20.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Su TL, Jaki T, Hickey GL, Buchan I, Sperrin M. A review of statistical updating methods for clinical prediction models. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(1):185–97.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Siregar S, Nieboer D, Vergouwe Y, Versteegh MI, Noyez L, Vonk AB, et al. Improved Prediction by Dynamic Modeling: An Exploratory Study in the Adult Cardiac Surgery Database of the Netherlands Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9(2):171–81.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Davis SE, Greevy RA Jr, Lasko TA, Walsh CG, Matheny ME. Detection of calibration drift in clinical prediction models to inform model updating. J Biomed Inform. 2020;112:103611.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chi S, Tian Y, Wang F, Zhou T, Jin S, Li J. A novel lifelong machine learning-based method to eliminate calibration drift in clinical prediction models. Artif Intell Med. 2022;125:102256.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gulati G, Upshaw JN, Wessler BS, Brazil RJ, Nelson J, van Klaveren D, et al. The Generalizability of Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Prediction Models: 158 Large-Scale Independent External Validations of 104 Unique Models. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022;15(4):e008487.

Shah N, Steyerberg E, Kent D. Big Data and Predictive Analytics: Recalibrating Expectations. JAMA. 2018;320(1):27–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jenkins DA, Martin GP, Sperrin M, Riley RD, Debray TPA, Collins GS, et al. Continual updating and monitoring of clinical prediction models: time for dynamic prediction systems? Diagn Progn Res. 2021;5(1):1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ioannidis JPA, Cripps S, Tanner MA. Forecasting for COVID-19 has failed. Int J Forecast. 2022;38(2):423–38.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr. Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal-external, and external validation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:245–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wolff RF, Moons KGM, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, et al. PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(1):51–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Venema E, Wessler BS, Paulus JK, Salah R, Raman G, Leung LY, et al. Large-scale validation of the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) using a short form: high risk of bias models show poorer discrimination. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;138:32–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Helmrich I, Mikolic A, Kent DM, Lingsma HF, Wynants L, Steyerberg EW, et al. Does poor methodological quality of prediction modeling studies translate to poor model performance? An illustration in traumatic brain injury. Diagn Progn Res. 2022;6(1):8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hickey GL, Grant SW, Caiado C, Kendall S, Dunning J, Poullis M, et al. Dynamic prediction modeling approaches for cardiac surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(6):649–58.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif