Based on this evidence, the main aim of our research is to describe the psychological, emotional and behavioral changes in Italian adolescents with different neuropsychiatric conditions before and during the first national lockdown and the effect on parental stress.
3. Results 3.1. Sample CharacteristicsWe recruited 183 families but five (2.7%) decided to not participate in our study. The total sample included 178 Caucasian adolescents and their families, aged between 12–18 years (mean age = 15.34 ± 2.17; male = 108, 61%) with the following neuropsychiatric diagnosis: epilepsy (n = 66; 37%), autism spectrum disorder (n = 26; 15%), specific learning disorders (n = 26; 15%), anxiety disorders (n = 15; 8%), intellectual disability (n = 13; 7%), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 11; 6%), behavioral disorders (n = 11; 6%), mood disorders (n = 10; 6%). The main socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of all the participants were summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. 3.2. Mean Score Comparison of CBCL before/during the First LockdownThe statistical comparison of the mean CBCL scores showed a significant increase (pTable 3).The effect size ranges from small to medium, according to the different scales, with a lower effect for the scale of Thought problems and a greater effect for the scales of Anxiety/Depression, Somatic complaints, Anxiety problems, Internalizing problems and Total problems (Table 3).Analyzing the subsamples divided by diagnoses, we found that all the CBCL scales were significantly higher in adolescents with specific learning disorders, anxiety, behavioral disorder and epilepsy (p < 0.05).
In adolescents with Autism, we found a significant increase in all the CBCL scales (p < 0.05) except for pervasive problems (Z = −1.450, p = 0.147) and attention problems (Z = −1.851, p = 0.064). In the adolescents with intellectual disabilities all the CBCL scales were significantly higher at Time 1 except Thought problems (Z = −1.409, p = 0.159) and ADHD (Z = −1.691, p = 0.091). We did not find significant changes in the CBCL scales in the ADHD subsample, excepting for the Somatic complaints scale (Z = −2134, p = 0.033). In the adolescent with mood disorder all the CBCL subscales were significantly higher (p < 0.05) except for Thought problems (Z = −0.250, p = 0.803).
3.3. Mean Score Comparison of PSI before/during the First LockdownWe found a statistically significant increase at Time 1 compared to Time 0 in all the mean scores of PSI (Parental Distress, Parent–child Difficult Interaction, Difficult Child, Total Stress) (Table 3). The effect size ranges from small to medium, with a lower effect for the Difficult Child scale and a greater effect for the Total stress scale (Table 3).Analyzing the different subsamples divided by diagnosis emerged that all the PSI scales were significantly higher in patients with autism, ADHD, specific learning disorder, anxiety and behavioral disorder (p < 0.05).
All the PSI scales were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the epilepsy subsample except for Parent–child Dysfunctional Interaction scale (Z = −1.364, p = 0.173).All of the mean scores of PSI scales were significantly higher (p < 0.05)in the intellectual disability subpopulation except for Difficult Child (Z = −1.436, p = 0.151). We did not find significant changes in the PSI scales in the mood disorder group (p > 0.05).
3.4. Correlation Analysis between PSI and CBCL ScalesThe correlation analysis showed a significant positive relationship between all the subscales of PSI (Parental Distress, Parent–child Difficult Interaction, Difficult Child and Total Stress) and the main scales of CBCL (Total problems, Externalizing problems, Internalizing problems). The strength was medium for all of the relationships analyzed. All the results of the correlation analysis are summarized in Table 4. 3.5. Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis at Time 1We performed multivariate linear regression analysis to investigate the effect of sex, age and diagnosis variables on CBCL and PSI scores at Time 1. We found that gender and age did not statistically significantly affect CBCL scores and PSI (Table 5), while the type of diagnosis has a statistically significant impact (Table 5).The posthoc analysis of CBCL scores showed statistically significant differences, as follows: the Total problems scale was significantly lower in patients with epilepsy than in patients with autism spectrum disorder (p = 0.017) and behavioral disorders (p = 0.005); the Externalizing problems scale was significantly lower in patients with epilepsy than in patients with autism spectrum disorder (p = 0.008), anxiety disorder (p = 0.008), mood disorder (p = 0.013) and behavioral disorder (p < 0.001); the Internalizing problems scale was lower in patients with epilepsy than in patients with behavioral disorder, but did not reach the statistical significance (p = 0.068).
The posthoc analysis of PSI scores showed the following results: The Parental Distress scale (PD) was significantly lower in patients with epilepsy than in those with autism spectrum disorder (p = 0.003), anxiety disorder (p = 0.001), ADHD (p = 0.044), behavioral disorder(p = 0.017), and was significantly higher in patients with an anxiety disorder than in patients with a specific learning disorder (0.043). The Parent–child Dysfunctional Interaction scale (P-CDI) was significantly lower in patients with epilepsy than in those with autism spectrum disorder (p = 0.046) and anxiety disorder (p = 0.037). The Difficult Child (DC) was significantly lower in patients with epilepsy than in those with autism spectrum disorder (p = 0.021). The Total Stress scale (TS) was significantly lower in patients with epilepsy than in those with autism spectrum disorder (p = 0.005), anxiety disorder (p = 0.004) and behavioral disorder (p = 0.023).
4. DiscussionThe aim of our research was to assess the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on an Italian adolescent population with neurological and psychiatric disorders and parental stress, comparing the pre-pandemic period with the first month of lockdown.
During the COVID-19 lockdown, children and adolescents suffered from isolation, confinement, boredom and worries about their psychophysical health [47,48,49,50,51,52], with increased concerns in parents about their children’s well-being [53,54]. Families with children with special needs presented the most serious consequences of the lockdown [55]. It is important to underline the close relationship between the parents’ and children’s emotional status, with significant repercussions on the entire families’ psychological well-being. The experience of specific worries about their children’s mental well-being increases the risk of depression, brooding and anxiety in their parents’ well-being [56]. On the other hand, increased parental anxiety and worries were related to emotional dysregulation and internalizing and externalizing problems in their children during the pandemic [57]. Our sample included 178 Italian adolescents and their families (Table 1 and Table 2), aged between 12–18 years with the following neuropsychiatric diagnosis: epilepsy (n = 66), autism spectrum disorder (n = 26), specific learning disorders (n = 26), anxiety disorders (n = 15), intellectual disability (n = 13), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 11), behavioral disorders (n = 11), mood disorders (n = 10). All the parents completed two standardized questionnaires for the assessment of emotional/behavioral symptoms of the adolescents (CBCL) and of parental stress (PSI) before/during the COVID-19 pandemic.Overall, our study showed a significant increase in both internalizing and externalizing symptoms in the whole sample during the lockdown, as reported by the parents. The statistical comparison before/during the lockdown showed a significant worsening in all scales of the CBCL, with a greater effect for the scales of Anxiety/Depression, Somatic complaints, Anxiety problems, Internalizing problems and Total problems. These findings suggest that internalizing problems, such as anxiety and somatic symptoms, had a greater impact in our sample.
Our results agree with a literature review by Guessoum et al., (2020) [13] that confirmed an increase in the symptomatology in adolescents with a psychiatric disorder, especially mood disorders, ADHD and autism spectrum disorder. Doyle and colleagues [58] detected a worsening in psychiatric symptoms of 171 youth outpatients (mean age aged 10.6 ± 3.1)during the school year following the first COVID-19 lockdown, including anxiety, oppositional behavior and hyperactivity/impulsivity. Conti et al. [21] registered a worsening of emotional and behavioral traits in 141 patients under the age of 18 (mean age = 10.6 ± 3.1 years) with neuropsychiatric disorders during the March 2020 lockdown. In addition, a tendency for a better reaction to the lockdown in psychiatric patients than the neurological disorders group has been suggested. Conversely, Raffagnato and colleagues [31] did not observe major changes during the lockdown compared to the previous period in a sample of children and adolescents with mental health disorders (n = 56; mean age = 13.4 ± 2.77 years). In particular, the authors concluded that the group of patients who previously suffered from internalizing disorders overall showed a good adaptation to the pandemic context, while a greater psychological discomfort was detected in patients with behavioral problems attributable to neurodevelopmental and conduct disorders. Finally, our results are at odds with those reported by De Giacomo et al. [35], which did not detect a worsening of the internalizing and externalizing CBCL symptoms in 71 children with neuropsychiatric disorders before and during the lockdown (average age 9.01 ± 3.67). This difference may be due to the different ages of our sample, which only considered adolescents.Analyzing the subsamples divided by diagnoses, we found that the adolescents with anxiety disorder, mood disorder, specific learning disorder, behavioral disorder and epilepsy showed a global worsening in all the CBCL scales. In agreement with our data, previous literature studies had shown a worsening of psychological well-being during the lockdown in patients with epilepsy and learning disabilities [28,29,59,60,61] probably due to difficulties with distance learning; in contrast with our results, a larger sample study found that both depressive and anxiety symptoms were lower for adolescents with mood disorders during the pandemic compared to before [62].In the subsample with Autism, we found a significant worsening of all the CBCL scales, except for pervasive problems and attention problems. In the adolescents with intellectual disabilities all the CBCL scales were significantly higher except for Thought problems and ADHD scales. Several previous studies confirmed a worsening in young people with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly represented by an increase in anxiety symptoms, irritability hyperactivity and behavioral problems [23,24,25,63], probably due to changes in their daily routines and access to therapies. Other studies, on the other hand, suggested a reduction in emotional behavioral manifestations in adolescents with autism due to lower social pressure [64].In our study, surprisingly, we did not find significant changes in the CBCL scales in the ADHD subsample, except for the Somatic complaints scale. These results are in contrast with previous surveys [26,27]. Behrmann et al. [65] observed in adolescent patients diagnosed with ADHD, who experience depression, anxiety, loneliness, boredom and emotional distress. We can speculate that the lockdown hit differently children and adolescent’s psychological well-being, considering that only adolescent subjects have been observed in our analysis.Analyzing the PSI scores we found a significant increase in parental stress during the lockdown in all the areas analyzed(Parental Distress, Parent–child Difficult Interaction, Difficult Child, Total Stress), with a lower effect for the Difficult Child scale and a greater effect for the Total stress scale. The feeling of having a complicated relationship with children was strongly heightened during the lockdown period, highlighting a greater perception of parental-role-related stress and total stress.
Analyzing the different subsamples that emerged, all the PSI scales were significantly higher in patients with autism, ADHD, specific learning disorder, anxiety and behavioral disorder. All the PSI scales were significantly higher in the epilepsy group except for Parent–child Dysfunctional Interaction scale. All the mean scores of PSI scales were significantly higher in the intellectual disability subpopulation, except for Difficult Child. The results of our study are in agreement with previous literature studies, which demonstrated increased parental stress in families with children and adolescents with neurological or psychiatric problems [66]. The study of De Giacomo et al. [35] highlights an increase in parental stress and a more difficult parent–child interaction in the period of lockdown due to the pandemic in a sample of children with neuropsychiatric conditions. Contrary to what we expected, we did not find significant changes in the PSI scales in parents of adolescents with mood disorders. We can hypothesize that internalizing symptoms, such as anxiety and mood disorders, could be hard to acknowledge and decipher; for this reason, these pathological states could worsen without being noticed. The correlation analysis showed a significant relationship between parental stress and the internalizing/externalizing symptoms of adolescent patients. In this regard, it was shown that the resilience of the entire family has a mutual influence on mental well-being and the ability to successfully cope with changes, both in parents and children, resulting in stress and depression of children related to those of parents [37]. In agreement with our results, Costa et al. [67] suggest that this relationship could be due to parents’ dissatisfied expectations of their children or else to a non-reinforcing parent–child interaction. These data are supported also by the study by Sesso et al. [30] that, in a cross-sectional study on pediatric patients with neuropsychiatric conditions during Lockdown, found significant positive associations between CBCL Internalizing problems of and all PSI subscales, and between CBCL Externalizing problems and Difficult Child subscales.The multivariate regression analysis in our sample highlighted that age and sex did not affect the emotional/behavioral symptoms and parental stress during the lockdown. On the contrary, the type of diagnosis could significantly affect both. More in detail, patients with epilepsy showed less emotional/behavioral problems, especially with regard to externalizing symptoms than adolescents with autism spectrum disorder, anxiety disorder, mood disorder and behavioral disorder. Finally, parental stress levels were lower in the epilepsy group than in the groups diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, anxiety disorder, specific learning disorder, ADHD, and behavioral disorder. This finding suggests that emotional–behavioral symptoms may be more present in pediatric patients with psychiatric disorders than in patients with epilepsy during the COVID-19 lockdown. Similarly, although high levels of parental stress are documented in the parents of patients with different neuropsychiatric conditions [68,69,70,71], parents of adolescents with psychiatric disorders may experience higher levels of stress than those of adolescents with epilepsy.The strength of the study was the use of standardized quantitative questionnaires and the focus on a specific population of patients (adolescents with neuropsychiatric disorders). The main limitation of our study is the small sample size, especially in some subgroups, which can reduce the statistical power. Other weaknesses of the study are the lack of a control group and the homogeneous geographical provenience of the participants. In future studies, we aim to analyze the emotional/behavioral symptoms of adolescents with neuropsychiatric disorders and parental stress over time (during and post the COVID-19 pandemic) and compare them with a control group. We aim to consider, in our future analysis, other socio-demographic and clinical variables than can affect psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.
留言 (0)