KEY POINTS
Question: What is the quality of available open access educational resources for anesthesia providers and trainees? Findings: We identified and evaluated the quality of 37 education websites that provide open access educational resources relevant to anesthesia providers and trainees worldwide. Meaning: The 37 open access websites may serve as a directory for anesthesia clinicians and educators globally seeking open access online learning or teaching resources, but the small number of available resources highlights the need for the development of additional open access resources for anesthesia providers worldwide.The development of the Internet radically democratized the availability of information, affording access to anyone, including those who are underserved or living with limited resources. This is a result of many factors, including increased access to high-speed Internet, flexibility of content delivery, improved usability and decreased cost of content authoring and website development tools, enhanced ability to upload and share resources, and opportunities for inclusion of remote and/or global learners. Websites, such as MIT OpenCourseWare (https://ocw.mit.edu) and Khan Academy (https://www.khanacademy.org), were early influencers in the educational domain, providing open access to educational resources for university and primary and secondary school education, respectively.
In the health care field, online learning has rapidly expanded across the continuum of undergraduate to graduate to health professional continuing education including anesthesia.1 While open access to journal articles2 and free open access medical education (FOAM) resources are becoming increasingly prevalent,3 some online educational resources for health professional education exist behind paywalls and still require payment for access, such as UpToDate (https://www.uptodate.com/) and Anesthesia Toolbox (https://www.anesthesiatoolbox.com). Other online educational resources exist behind firewalls and do not allow external/open access as only students, faculty, and health care providers in those organizations have access to those websites. This lack of open access content may promote global inequities in the availability and sharing of information and may have the most significant impact on health care professionals working in lower resourced settings where the need is the greatest. In the Education of Health Professionals for the 21st Century Commission led by Frenk et al,4 several themes emerged as proposed strategies to assist with improving health care professional training globally. These include harnessing the power of information technology solutions to increase access to resources and to promote global sharing of online resources. The potential effect of e-learning was proposed to be revolutionary.
The extent of open access online educational websites that are freely accessible to clinicians and trainees in anesthesiology worldwide is unknown. In this study, we aimed to identify and describe available open access online educational websites for anesthesia providers and to evaluate the quality of these websites using a modification of a previously validated medical education website quality evaluation tool.
METHODSWe did not obtain institutional review board review for this research given it was limited to publicly available online resources and does not involve any subjects or contain any patient or protected information.
Modification of a Medical Education Website Assessment ToolThe Medical Education Website Quality Evaluation Tool (MEWQET) is a tool developed for assessment of undergraduate medical education websites in the field of pathology5 and has been previously modified for assessment of undergraduate and graduate medical education websites in the fields of otolaryngology (Modified Education in Otolaryngology Website [MEOW]) and critical care medicine (Critical Care Medical Education Website Quality Evaluation Tool [CCMEWQET]).6,7 To evaluate the quality of medical education websites in anesthesia, we adapted the CCMEWQET to be specific to anesthesia rather than critical care medicine by changing the term “critical care” to “anesthesia” or “anesthesiology.” The Anesthesia Medical Education Website Quality Evaluation Tool (AMEWQET, Supplemental Digital Content 1, Table 1, https://links.lww.com/AA/E34) assigns a score to websites based on 32 items assessing 10 domains: authorship, credibility, aim/scope, comprehensiveness, content quality/accuracy, currency of information, site navigability, access, interactivity, and graphic/media elements, with a possible total score of 73.
Literature Review and Web SearchThere are many types of online educational resources available, including websites, mobile applications, social media posts on platforms such as Twitter, videos on platforms such as YouTube, or podcasts on platforms such as Soundcloud. Accurate evaluation of the quality of each of these types of educational resources requires its own individual evaluation tool.8–12 This study focuses on the evaluation of open access websites readily accessible through an Internet-based search. Thus, nonwebsite educational resources were excluded from our review.
We conducted a literature review and web search in May 2021 in collaboration with the Boston Children’s Hospital Library Services to identify websites relevant for anesthesia education. To identify relevant articles referencing education-focused anesthesia websites in the literature, we performed a PubMed search of articles published between 2009 and 2020 using the following search terms: (“anesthesia” OR “anesthesiology”) AND (“online resources,” “online education,” “online learning,” “educational website(s),” “educational video(s),” “video-based education,” “video-based learning,” “e-learning,” “Internet-based resources,” “Internet-based education,” “Internet-based learning,” “web-based resources,” “web-based education,” “web-based learning,” “web-based educational resources,” “podcast(s),” “blog(s),” “serious gaming,” “free open access medical education,” or “FOAMed”). We also conducted a web search using the search engine Startpage (www.startpage.com), which generates search results that are not influenced by geographic location or user browser history to reduce bias. We performed a search using the following terms: (“education,” “learn,” “resource,” “FOAM”) AND (“anesthesia,” “anaesthesia,” “anesthesiology,” OR “anaesthesiology”).
One author (A.A.K.) reviewed all articles that met inclusion criteria to identify potential website names and URLs, which were subsequently screened as well. Our inclusion criteria included websites that (1) potentially contained online educational content relevant for anesthesia providers or trainees, (2) offered content free of charge, and (3) were written in the English language. Websites not offering content free of charge or specific to anesthesia were excluded. Online journals were felt to be beyond the scope of this article; however, websites of online journals were included if they contained other types of educational materials (for example, podcasts) on their website. One author (A.A.K.) screened titles and abstracts of all resulting articles and all websites to determine whether they met our inclusion criteria. We identified additional websites that met inclusion criteria from references in the articles and links from the websites.
Evaluation of Identified Websites/Tool ApplicationAll websites that met inclusion criteria were reviewed on a computer. They were not assessed for functionality in a tablet or mobile environment. To achieve consensus on the review process, all reviewers initially independently reviewed 5 websites, and scores were compared across reviewers.
Potential ConflictF. M. Evans, A. A. Krotinger, G. A. Pereira, and T. A. Wolbrink are associated with OPENPediatrics, F. M. Evans and M. Lilaonitkul are associated with both the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WFSA) and ATOTW, and F. M. Evans is associated with SPA. No reviewer reviewed a website with which she is associated. Scoring discrepancies were discussed, and consensus was achieved. One medical education expert (T.A.W., A.A.K., or G.A.P.) and 1 anesthesiologist (F.M.E., H.F.K., or M.L.) reviewed each of the remaining websites and scored them using the AMEWQET. All scores were reviewed for agreement, and any disagreement was discussed with both reviewers until consensus was reached. Any remaining discrepancies were discussed among the entire team of reviewers (T.A.W., A.A.K., G.A.P., F.M.E., H.F.K., and M.L.) for further input. To evaluate interrater agreement, a kappa analysis was performed on the individual scores of the 2 reviewers for each item in each website. Absolute agreement percentage was calculated as well as kappa as a chance-corrected measure of agreement. Overall, there was excellent agreement and consistency between reviewers for all items across 37 websites (kappa = 0.81, absolute agreement = 85%). There was good to excellent agreement for each individual item or criteria (Supplemental Digital Content 2, Table 2, https://links.lww.com/AA/E35).
Statistical AnalysisWebsites were divided into tertiles based on their total AMEWQET score. Frequencies and percentages were used to report overall scores and scores across tertiles for each criterion. The Fisher exact test was used to compare percentages for each AMEWQET criterion across the tertiles. Two-sided P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation) and Stata version 16.1 (StataCorp LLC) were used for data analysis.
RESULTSSeventy-five articles and 108 websites were identified in the initial PubMed and Startpage search. Sixty-one articles and 41 websites did not meet inclusion criteria and were excluded (Figure 1). An additional 44 websites were excluded because they did not contain any open access content. A total of 37 websites were reviewed using the AMEWQET.
Figure 1.:PRISMA flow diagram showing the PubMed and Startpage search strategy used to identify websites for scoring with AMEWQET. AMEWQET indicates Anesthesia Medical Education Website Quality Evaluation Tool; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Tables 1 and 2 list the 37 scored websites by tertile and include the website name, URL, affiliated organization(s) (if applicable), and description of learning activities/content. The most common types of educational content included videos (66%, 25/37), text-based resources (51%, 19/37), podcasts (35%, 13/37), and interactive learning resources (32%, 12/37). Most websites (73%, 27/37) included more than 1 type of content. Only 3 websites explicitly listed their aim to support education and training of anesthesia clinicians in low- and middle-income settings.
Table 1. - Thirty-Seven Scored Websites by Tertile, Including Website Name, URL, Affiliated Organization(s) (if Applicable), and Description of Learning Activities/Content (Upper Tertile) Website name (affiliated organization[s], if applicable) URL Learning activities/content Upper tertile The Anaesthesia Blog (Association of Anaesthetists) https://theanaesthesia.blog/ Blog for Anaesthesia, the official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists. Includes blog posts, open access journal articles, and podcasts on a variety of anesthesia-related topics. Anesthesia and Critical Care Reviews and Commentary http://accrac.com/ Bimonthly podcast series developed for anesthesia trainees reviewing for examinations and as a forum for interesting topics, debates, and interviews in anesthesia and critical care. Anesthesiology News https://www.anesthesiologynews.com/ Open access white papers and monographs on a wide variety of topics relevant to practicing anesthesiologists. Also includes videos, podcasts, open access journal articles, and CME opportunities. Anaesthesia UK https://www.frca.co.uk/ Interactive practice questions, journal abstracts, and reference articles aimed at trainees preparing for postgraduate anesthesia examination. eSafe (Royal College of Anaesthetists, Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain Foundation, WFSA [see below], e-Learning for Health) https://www.e-safe-anaesthesia.org/ Interactive educational tool that includes e-learning self-paced courses, video tutorials, and links to open access articles on a variety of anesthesia topics. Developed to support the education, training, and CME of anesthesia providers working in resource-poor settings. New England Journal of Medicine https://www.nejm.org/multimedia/ Interactive case examples, daily questions, audio interviews, and illustration and video galleries. OpenAnesthesia (International Anesthesia Research Society) https://www.openanesthesia.org/ Hosts a variety of subspecialty areas and includes an assortment of educational resources such as “Question of the Day,” ABA key words, problem-based discussions, podcasts, video-based resources, and virtual grand rounds conducted in collaboration with various professional societies. OPENPediatrics (Boston Children’s Hospital) https://www.openpediatrics.org/ Digital learning platform for pediatric clinicians. Includes peer-reviewed videos in critical care, pediatrics, and anesthesia; podcasts; interactive mechanical ventilation and dialysis simulators; and courses with pre- and postcourse multiple-choice questions assessments. Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care https://www.snacc.org/ Focus on neuroanesthesia; resources include “articles of the month,” topic reviews, interactive clinical cases, quizzes, and podcasts. Society for Pediatric Anesthesia https://pedsanesthesia.org Hosts a Question of the Week that addresses keywords from the American Board of Anesthesia’s pediatric anesthesia in-training examination, 1-pagers that are concise summaries on a wide range of medical education, faculty development and wellness topics, SPA PowerPoint lecture series, and featured videos from previous meetings. Toronto General Hospital http://pie.med.utoronto.ca/ Focus on cardiac anesthesia; features a series of interactive teaching aids including notes, simulators, and videos to assist faculty in training residents and fellows. Ultrasound for Regional Anaesthesia http://www.usra.ca/ Ultrasound images and video galleries, background information, virtual anatomy resources, and procedural techniques for regional anesthesia and pain medicine. WFSA https://www.wfsahq.org/ Resource hub of open source journal articles, books, and videos in anesthesia and WFSA’s flagship online publications: ATOTW and UiA. Aims to support education and training especially in low- and middle-income settings.Abbreviations: ABA, American Board of Anesthesiology; ATOTW, Anaesthesia Tutorial of the Week; CME, continuing medical education; SPA, Society for Pediatric Anesthesia; UiA, Update in Anaesthesia; WFSA, World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists.
Abbreviations: ASRA, American Society of Regional Anesthesia; BJA, British Journal of Anaesthesia; CHOP, Children’s Hospital of Pennsylvania; CME, continuing medical education; CRNA, certified registered nurse anesthetist; EEG, electroencephalogram; FOAM, Free-Open Access Medical Education; IARS, International Anesthesia Research Society; ICE-TAP, International Consortium for EEG Training of Anesthesia Practitioners; LMS, learning management system; NIH, National Institutes of Health; OPEN, Online Pediatric Education Network; SOAP, Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology.
留言 (0)