Foster HE, Dahm P, Kohler TS, Lerner LB, Parsons JK, Wilt TJ, et al. Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA Guideline Amendment 2019. J Urol. 2019;202:592–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gravas SC, Cornu JN, Gacci M, Gratzke C, Herrmann TRW, Mamoulakis C, et al. Guidelines Associates: Karavitakis M, Kyriazis I, Malde S, Sakalis V, Umbach R. EAU-Guidelines on Management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), incl. Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO)—Update March. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/management-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts.

Sahakyan Y, Erman A, Bhojani N, Chughtai B, Zorn KC, Sander B, et al. Pharmacotherapy vs. minimally invasive therapies as initial therapy for moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia: a cost-effectiveness study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00561-2.

Carbonara U, Osardu RK, Cisu TI, Balthazar A, Crocerossa F, Autorino R. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for giant benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cent Eur J Urol. 2020;73:383–4.

Google Scholar 

Banapour P, Patel N, Kane CJ, Cohen SA, Parsons JK. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: a systematic review and report of a single institution case series. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014;17:1–5.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Manfredi C, Arcaniolo D, Spatafora P, Crocerossa F, Fusco F, Verze P, et al. Emerging minimally invasive transurethral treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis of functional outcomes and description of complications. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04530-4.

Ravivarapu KT, Omidele O, Pfail J, Tomer N, Small AC, Palese MA. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy: a New York statewide analysis of early adoption and outcomes between 2009 and 2017. J Robot Surg. 2021;15:627–33.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dotzauer R, La Torre A, Thomas A, Brandt MP, Böhm K, Mager R, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy: a single-center comparison. World J Urol. 2021;39:149–56.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Cho JM, Moon KT, Lee JH, Choi JD, Kang JY, Yoo TK. Open simple prostatectomy and robotic simple prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: Comparison of safety and efficacy. Prostate Int. 2021;9:101–6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Golomb D, Berto FG, Bjazevic J, Gomez JA, Chin JLK, Luke PP, et al. Simple prostatectomy using the open and robotic approaches for lower urinary tract symptoms: a retrospective, case-control series. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.7351.

Sorokin I, Sundaram V, Singla N, Walker J, Margulis V, Roehrborn C, et al. Robot-assisted versus open simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands: a propensity score-matched comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes. J Endourol. 2017;31:1164–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bhanvadia R, Ashbrook C, Gahan J, Mauck R, Bagrodia A, Margulis V, et al. Perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic vs open simple prostatectomy in the modern robotic era: results from the National Inpatient Sample. BJU Int. 2021;128:168–77.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fusco F, Creta M, Trama F, Esposito F, Crocetto F, Aveta A, et al. Tamsulosin plus a new complementary and alternative medicine in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results from a retrospective comparative study. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2020;92. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2020.3.173.

Cantiello F, Fimognari D, Di Mauro M, Crocerossa F, Carbonara U, Ferro M, et al. Mechanical and ablative minimally invasive techniques for male LUTS due to benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review according to BPH-6 evaluation. Urol Int. 2021;105:1–11.

Lombardo R, Zarraonandia Andraca A, Tema G, Cancrini F, Carrion Valencia A, González-Dacal JA, et al. How many procedures are needed to achieve learning curve of Millin simple laparoscopic prostatectomy? Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74:225–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zarraonandia Andraca A, Lombardo R, Carrion Valencia A, González-Dacal JA, Rodríguez Núñez H, Samper Mateo P, et al. Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: a large single-center prospective cohort study. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73:107–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Loizzo D, Pandolfo SD, Rogers D, Cerrato C, di Meo NA, Autorino R, et al. Novel insights into autophagy and prostate cancer: a comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:3826.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kordan Y, Canda AE, Köseoğlu E, Balbay D, Laguna MP, de la Rosette J. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2020;9:E1798.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leonardo C, Lombardo R, Cindolo L, Antonelli A, Greco F, Porreca A, et al. What is the standard surgical approach to large volume BPE? Systematic review of existing randomized clinical trials. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;72:22–29.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Del Giudice F, Oh JK, Basran S, Nicaise E, Song PH, Kim W, et al. Recent trends in the diagnostic and surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the U.S. from 2004 to 2017: annual changes in the selection of treatment options and medical costs. Appl Sci. 2022;12:8697.

Article  Google Scholar 

Li J, Cao D, Peng L, Ren Z, Gou H, Li Y, et al. Comparison between minimally invasive simple prostatectomy and open simple prostatectomy for large prostates: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials. J Endourol. 2019;33:767–76.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lucca I, Shariat SF, Hofbauer SL, Klatte T. Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2015;33:563–70.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, Yuan P, Ma D, Gao X, Wei C, Liu Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of enucleation vs. resection of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019;22:493–508.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Checcucci E, Volpi G, DE Cillis S, Piramide F, Piana A, Veccia A, et al. Comment on: ‘Emerging minimally invasive transurethral treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis of functional outcomes and description of complications’. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74:475–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zell MA, Abdul-Muhsin H, Navaratnam A, Cumsky J, Girardo M, Cornella J, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for very large benign prostatic hyperplasia (≥200 cc). World J Urol. 2021;39:129–34.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Brunckhorst O, Ahmed K, Nehikhare O, Marra G, Challacombe B, Popert R. Evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using multiple outcome measures. Urology. 2015;86:824–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fuschi A, Al Salhi Y, Velotti G, Capone L, Martoccia A, Suraci PP, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of prostate versus minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for large volume (≥120 mL) prostate glands: a prospective multicenter randomized study. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73:638–48.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Peña BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11:319–26.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Athanasiadis DI, Martin A, Kapsampelis P, Monfared S, Stefanidis D. Factors associated with weight regain post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:4069–84.

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. The BMJ. https://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d5928.abstract. Accessed 20 July 2022.

Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27:1785–805.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McGrath S, Zhao X, Steele R, Thombs BD, Benedetti A. DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2020;29:2520–37.

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lau J, Ioannidis JPA, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I. The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ. 2006;333:597–600.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nestler S, Bach T, Herrmann T, Jutzi S, Roos FC, Hampel C, et al. Surgical treatment of large volume prostates: a matched pair analysis comparing the open, endoscopic (ThuVEP) and robotic approach. World J Urol. 2019;37:1927–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mourmouris P, Keskin SM, Skolarikos A, Argun OB, Karagiannis AA, Tufek I, et al. A prospective comparative analysis of robot-assisted vs open simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 2019;123:313–7.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zhang MW, El Tayeb MM, Borofsky MS, Dauw CA, Wagner KR, Lowry PS, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2017;31:847–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Umari P, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Pokorny M, De Groote R, Geurts N, et al. Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with large volume prostate: a comparative analysis from a high volume center. J Urol. 2017;197:1108–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hou C-P, Lin Y-H, Yang P-S, Chang P-L, Chen C-L, Lin K-Y, et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate compared with robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy for prostates larger than 80 cm3 in aging male. Am J Mens Health. 2021;15:15579883211064128.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Grivas N, Zachos I, Georgiadis G, Karavitakis M, Tzortzis V, Mamoulakis C. Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review. World J Urol. 2022;40:929–49.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Johnson B, Sorokin I, Singla N, Roehrborn C, Gahan JC. Determining the learning curve for robot-assisted simple prostatectomy in surgeons familiar with robotic surgery. J Endourol. 2018;32:865–70.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van der Schans EM, Hiep MAJ, Consten ECJ, Broeders IAMJ. From Da Vinci Si to Da Vinci Xi: realistic times in draping and docking the robot. J Robot Surg. 2020;14:835–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Loizzo D, Pandolfo SD, Autorino R. Editorial comment. J Urol. 2022;207:991–2.

Article  PubMed