Hemodynamic force assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in HFpEF: A case-control substudy from the HFpEF stress trial

eBioMedicineeBioMedicineVolume 86, December 2022, 104334Journal home page for eBioMedicineAuthor links open overlay panelSummaryBackground

The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Exercise-stress testing is recommended in case of uncertainty; however, this approach is time-consuming and costly. Since preserved EF does not represent normal systolic function, we hypothesized comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of cardiac hemodynamic forces (HDF) may identify functional abnormalities in HFpEF.

Methods

The HFpEF Stress Trial (DZHK-17; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03260621) prospectively recruited 75 patients with exertional dyspnea, preserved EF (≥50%) and signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e’ ≥8) on echocardiography. Patients underwent rest and exercise-stress right heart catheterisation, echocardiography and CMR. The final study cohort consisted of 68 patients (HFpEF n = 34 and non-cardiac dyspnea n = 34 according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)). HDF assessment included left ventricular (LV) longitudinal, systolic peak and impulse, systolic/diastolic transition, E-wave deceleration as well as A-wave acceleration forces. Follow-up after 24 months evaluated cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation (CVH) – only two patients were lost to follow-up.

Findings

HDF assessment revealed impairment of LV longitudinal function in patients with HFpEF compared to non-cardiac dyspnoea (15.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.035), attributable to impairment of systolic peak (38.6% vs 51.6%, p = 0.003) and impulse (20.8% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.009) forces as well as late diastolic filling (−3.8% vs −5.4%, p = 0.029). Early diastolic filling was impaired in HFpEF patients identified at rest compared with patients identified during stress only (7.7% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.004). Impaired systolic peak was associated with CVH (HR 0.95, p = 0.016), and was superior to LV global longitudinal strain assessment in prediction of CVH (AUC 0.76 vs. 0.61, p = 0.048).

Interpretation

Assessment of HDF indicates impairment of LV systolic ejection force in HFpEF which is associated with cardiovascular events.

Funding

German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK).

Keywords

HFpEF

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Hemodynamic force

Deformation imaging

Strain

AbbreviationsbSSFP

balanced steady state free precession

CMR

cardiovascular magnetic resonance

CVH

cardiovascular hospitalisation

GLS/GCS/GRS

global longitudinal/circumferential/radial strain

EDV/ESV

End diastolic/systolic volume

Ees

End-systolic elastance

HFpEF

heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

HFrEF

heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

IVPG

intraventricular pressure gradient

LAVI

Left atrial volume index

NTproBNP

N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide

NYHA

New York Heart Association

PCWP

Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure

RHC

right heart catheterisation

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif