Available online 18 November 2022
Author links open overlay panelHighlights•3D-print manufacturing accuracy is sufficient to fabricate crowns for clinical use.
•Marginal accuracy positively correlated with overall cement-space thickness.
•Micro-CT with visible-light scanning enabled trueness and cement-space analysis.
•3D-printing performance was in-between those of chairside and laboratory milling.
•Laboratory milling revealed the best accuracy and crown adaptation.
AbstractObjectivesTo correlate trueness and cement-space characteristics of crowns milled chairside and in the laboratory with those of inkjet 3D-printed crowns, and to assess whether 3D-printing accuracy meets the clinical standard.
MethodsThirty crowns were either (1) milled using a chairside Cerec MCXL unit from Cerec Zirconia Mono L (Dentsply Sirona), (2) milled using a LX-O 5-axis (Matsuura Machinery) industrial machine from Initial Zirconia HT (GC), or (3) 3D-printed using an inkjet Carmel 1400 (Xjet) printer (n = 10). Crown trueness determined by comparing the original CAD with each visible-light digitized crown was correlated with the 3D cement-space characteristics recorded by micro-CT. Statistics involved Kruskal-Wallis testing and Spearman correlation.
ResultsCrown trueness at the intaglio marginal area positively correlated with the marginal and axial cement-space characteristics. 3D-printing revealed data in-between those of the two milling systems with undercut values being not statistically different from those recorded for chairside milling and a low overcut level that was statistically similar to that obtained by laboratory milling. Laboratory milling revealed a significantly better marginal accuracy with a consequently lower cement-space thickness. A higher overcut level was recorded for the chairside-milled crowns in the marginal/occlusal thirds, resulting in the significantly highest occlusal cement-space thickness and cement-volume percentage with a cement thickness above 120 µm (limit considered as clinically acceptable). No statistical difference in trueness was found for the external crown dimensions.
SignificanceThe 3D-printed zirconia crowns provided sufficient manufacturing accuracy for clinical use. Accurate milling and printing of the crown’s intaglio marginal area is primordial.
KeywordsAdditive manufacturing
CAD/CAM
Ceramics
Inkjet
Trueness
View full text© 2022 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
留言 (0)