Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2018.

Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2018.

Jamieson S, Gray C. The supervision of undergraduate research students: expectations of student and supervisor. Practice and Evidence of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 2006;1(1):37–59.

Google Scholar 

Stefani LAJ, Tariq V-N, Heylings DJA, Butcher AC. A comparison of tutor and student conceptions of undergraduate research project work. Assess Eval High Educ. 1997;22(3):271–88.

Article  Google Scholar 

Amgad M, Tsui MMK, Liptrott SJ, Shash E. Medical student research: an integrated mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6): e0127470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216320907065.

Article  Google Scholar 

Enomoto K, Warner R, Nygaard C. Teaching and learning innovations in higher education. Oxfordshire, England: Libri; 2021.

Maxwell TW, Smyth R. Higher degree research supervision: from practice toward theory. High Educ Res Dev. 2011;30(2):219–31.

Article  Google Scholar 

Muhandiramge J, Vu T, Wallace MJ, Segelov E. The experiences, attitudes and understanding of research amongst medical students at an Australian medical school. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21:267. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02713-9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stone C, Dogbey GY, Klenzak S, Van Fossen K, Tan B, Brannan GD. Contemporary global perspectives of medical students on research during undergraduate medical education: a systematic literature review. Med Educ Online. 2018;23(1):1537430. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1537430.

Article  Google Scholar 

Murray MM, Kolanczyk DM, Phatak A, Schmidt J, Kliethermes MA, Tran T, DePatis K, Vest K. Barriers to and factors influencing the pursuit of pharmacy student research. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020;12(11):1297–303.

Article  Google Scholar 

MacDougall M, Riley SC. Initiating undergraduate medical students into communities of research practise: what do supervisors recommend? BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-83.

Article  Google Scholar 

Quarton B. Research skills and the new undergraduate. J Instr Psychol. 2003;30(2):120–5.

Google Scholar 

Agee J. Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2009;22(4):431–47.

Article  Google Scholar 

Beckman TJ, Cook DA. Developing scholarly projects in education: a primer for medical teachers. Med Teach. 2007;29(2–3):210–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rotgans JI. The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2012;17(4):515–27.

Article  Google Scholar 

Varpio L, Paradis E, Uijtdehaage S, Young M. The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Acad Med. 2020;95(7):989–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley C, Stevenson F. Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 1999;9(1):26–44.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lawson McLean A, Saunders C, Velu PP, Iredale J, Hor K, Russell CD. Twelve tips for teachers to encourage student engagement in academic medicine. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):549–54.

Article  Google Scholar 

Finlay L. Reflexivity: an essential component for all research? Br J Occup Ther. 1998;61(10):453–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Banister P, Burman E, Parker I, Taylor M, Tindall C. Qualitative methods in psychology: a research guide. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press; 1994.

Google Scholar 

Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE; 2008.

Tolich M, Tumilty E. Finding your ethical research self: a guidebook for novice qualitative researchers. London, England: Routledge; 2021.

Book  Google Scholar 

O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–51.

Article  Google Scholar 

Torralba KD, Jose D, Byrne J. Psychological safety, the hidden curriculum, and ambiguity in medicine. Clin Rheumatol. 2020;39(3):667–71.

Article  Google Scholar 

Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2019;11(4):589–97.

Article  Google Scholar 

Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. London: SAGE; 2021.

Google Scholar 

Lingard L, Watling C. Story, not study: 30 brief lessons to inspire health researchers as writers. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2021.

Book  Google Scholar