Mitchell P, et al. Age-related macular degeneration. Lancet. 2018;392(10153):1147–59.
Cheung N, Mitchell P, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet. 2010;376(9735):124–36.
Daruich A, et al. Central serous chorioretinopathy: Recent findings and new physiopathology hypothesis. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;48:82–118.
Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB. Branch retinal vein occlusion: Natural history of visual outcome. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(1):13–22.
Pichi, F. and P. Neri, Complications in uveitis. p. X, 288 p. 89 illus., 73 illus. in color. online resource.
Huang D, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254(5035):1178–81.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schmidt-Erfurth U, et al. AI-based monitoring of retinal fluid in disease activity and under therapy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2022;86:100972.
Virgili, G., et al., Optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detection of macular oedema in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015. 1: p. CD008081.
Schmidt-Erfurth U, et al. Guidelines for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration by the European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA). Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(9):1144–67.
Group CR, et al. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(20):1897–908.
Silva R, et al. Treat-and-extend versus monthly regimen in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Results with ranibizumab from the TREND study. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(1):57–65.
Flaxel CJ, et al. Age-related macular degeneration preferred practice pattern(R). Ophthalmology. 2020;127(1):P1–65.
Keenan TDL, et al. Retinal specialist versus artificial intelligence detection of retinal fluid from OCT: Age-related eye disease study 2: 10-Year follow-on study. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(1):100–9.
Sarhan MH, et al. Machine learning techniques for ophthalmic data processing: A review. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020;24(12):3338–50.
Bogunovic H, et al. RETOUCH: The retinal OCT fluid detection and segmentation benchmark and challenge. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019;38(8):1858–74.
De Fauw J, et al. Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease. Nat Med. 2018;24(9):1342–50.
Lin, M., et al., Recent advanced deep learning architectures for retinal fluid segmentation on optical coherence tomography images. Sensors (Basel), 2022. 22(8).
Rim TH, et al. Computer-aided detection and abnormality score for the outer retinal layer in optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022;106(9):1301–7.
Rim TH, et al. Detection of features associated with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in ethnically distinct data sets by an optical coherence tomography: Trained deep learning algorithm. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105(8):1133–9.
Golubnitschaja O, et al. Medicine in the early twenty-first century: Paradigm and anticipation - EPMA position paper 2016. EPMA J. 2016;7:23.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM. 2017;60(6):84–90.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521(7553):436–44.
Vaswani, A., et al., Attention is all you need, in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017, Curran Associates Inc.: Long Beach, California, USA. p. 6000–6010.
Dosovitskiy, A., et al., An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. 2021.
Han, K., et al., A survey on visual transformer. ArXiv, 2020. abs/2012.12556.
Raghu, M., et al. Do vision transformers see like convolutional neural networks? 2021. arXiv:2108.08810.
Karimi, D., S. Vasylechko, and A. Gholipour Convolution-free medical image segmentation using transformers. 2021. arXiv:2102.13645.
Chen, J., et al. TransUNet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. 2021. arXiv:2102.04306.
Luo, X., et al. Semi-supervised medical image segmentation via cross teaching between CNN and transformer. 2021. arXiv:2112.04894.
Kermany DS, et al. Identifying medical diagnoses and treatable diseases by image-based deep learning. Cell. 2018;172(5):1122-1131 e9.
Fuchs P, et al. Artificial intelligence in the management of anti-VEGF treatment: The Vienna fluid monitor in clinical practice. Ophthalmologe. 2022;119(5):520–4.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yu HJ, et al. Home monitoring of age-related macular degeneration: Utility of the ForeseeHome device for detection of neovascularization. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;5(4):348–56.
Liu Y, Holekamp NM, Heier JS. Prospective, longitudinal study: Daily self-imaging with home OCT for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmol Retina. 2022;6(7):575–85.
Skelly, A., et al., Treat and extend treatment interval patterns with anti-VEGF therapy in nAMD patients. Vision (Basel), 2019. 3(3).
Hasler PW, Flammer J. Predictive, preventive and personalised medicine for age-related macular degeneration. EPMA J. 2010;1(2):245–51.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Golubnitschaja O. Time for new guidelines in advanced diabetes care: Paradigm change from delayed interventional approach to predictive, preventive & personalized medicine. EPMA J. 2010;1(1):3–12.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Majithia S, et al. Cohort profile: The Singapore epidemiology of eye diseases study (SEED). Int J Epidemiol. 2021;50(1):41–52.
Hassan B, et al. Deep learning based joint segmentation and characterization of multi-class retinal fluid lesions on OCT scans for clinical use in anti-VEGF therapy. Comput Biol Med. 2021;136:104727.
Mantel I, et al. Automated quantification of pathological fluids in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, and its repeatability using deep learning. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 2021;10(4):17–17.
Wilson M, et al. Validation and clinical applicability of whole-volume automated segmentation of optical coherence tomography in retinal disease using deep learning. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(9):964–73.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ranftl, R., A. Bochkovskiy, and V. Koltun Vision transformers for dense prediction. 2021. arXiv:2103.13413.
Hu, J., L. Shen, and G. Sun. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. in 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2018.
Lee, Y. and J. Park CenterMask : Real-time anchor-free instance segmentation. 2019. arXiv:1911.06667.
Wang, S., et al., U-Net using stacked dilated convolutions for medical image segmentation. ArXiv, 2020. abs/2004.03466.
Oktay, O., et al. Attention U-net: Learning where to look for the pancreas. 2018. arXiv:1804.03999.
Chakravarthy U, et al. Automated identification of lesion activity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(8):1731–6.
Kwon JM, et al. Validation of deep-learning-based triage and acuity score using a large national dataset. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0205836.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Alryalat, S.A., et al., Deep learning prediction of response to anti-VEGF among diabetic macular edema patients: Treatment response analyzer system (TRAS). Diagnostics (Basel), 2022. 12(2).
Lanzetta P, Loewenstein A, Vision Academy Steering. Fundamental principles of an anti-VEGF treatment regimen: Optimal application of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy of macular diseases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(7):1259–73.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Granstam E, et al. Switching anti-VEGF agent for wet AMD: evaluation of impact on visual acuity, treatment frequency and retinal morphology in a real-world clinical setting. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259(8):2085–93.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ran AR, et al. Three-dimensional multi-task deep learning model to detect glaucomatous optic neuropathy and myopic features from optical coherence tomography scans: A retrospective multi-centre study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:860574.
留言 (0)