Targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Plasma Samples in Gastric Cancer by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Matsumoto T.a· Fukuzawa M.a· Itoi T.a· Sugimoto M.Aizawa Y.b· Sunamura M.c· Kawai T.d· Nemoto D.a· Shinohara H.a· Muramatsu T.a· Suzuki Y.a· Kagawa Y.a· Suguro M.a· Uchida K.a· Koyama Y.a· Madarame A.a· Morise T.a· Yamaguchi H.a· Sugimoto A.a· Yamauchi Y.a· Kono S.a· Naito S.a

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
bResearch and Development Center for Minimally Invasive Therapies, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
cDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery and Transplantation Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
dEndoscopy Center, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply

Select

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Research Article

Received: September 18, 2021
Accepted: August 15, 2022
Published online: November 18, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 12
Number of Figures: 6
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0012-2823 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9867 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DIG

Abstract

Introduction: As the high mortality rate of gastric cancer (GC) is due to delayed diagnosis, early detection is vital for improved patient outcomes. Metabolic deregulation plays an important role in GC. Although various metabolite-level biomarkers for early detection have been assessed, there is still no unified early detection method. We conducted a plasma metabolome study to assess metabolites that may distinguish GC samples from non-GC samples. Methods: Blood samples were collected from 72 GC patients and 29 control participants (non-GC group) at the Tokyo Medical University Hospital between March 2020 and November 2020. Hydrophilic metabolites were identified and quantified using liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Differences in metabolite concentrations between the GC and non-GC groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney test. The discrimination ability of each metabolite was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. A radial basis function (RBF) kernel-based support vector machine (SVM) model was developed to assess the discrimination ability of multiple metabolites. The selection of variables used for the SVM utilized a step-wise regression method. Results: Of the 96 quantified metabolites, 8 were significantly different between the GC and non-GC groups. Of these, N1-acetylspermine, succinate, and histidine were used in the RBF-SVM model to discriminate GC samples from non-GC samples. The area under the curve (AUC) of the RBF-SVM model was higher (0.915; 95% CI: 0.865–0.965, p < 0.0001), indicating good performance of the RBF-SVM model. The application of this RBF-SVM to the validation dataset resulted from the AUC of the RBF-SVM model was (0.885; 95% CI: 0.797–0.973, p < 0.0001), indicating the good performance of the RBF-SVM model. The sensitivity of the RBF-SVM model was better (69.0%) than those of the common tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (10.5%) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (2.86%). The RBF-SVM showed a low correlation with CEA and CA19-9, indicating its independence. Conclusion: We analyzed plasma metabolomics, and a combination of the quantified metabolites showed high sensitivity for the detection of GC. The independence of the RBF-SVM from tumor markers suggested that their complementary use would be helpful for GC screening.

© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel

References Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394–424. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209–49. Ford AC, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P. Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy to prevent gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2020 Dec;69(12):2113–21. Tsai CK, Yeh TS, Wu RC, Lai YC, Chiang MH, Lu KY, et al. Metabolomic alterations and chromosomal instability status in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep 7;24(33):3760–9. Necula L, Matei L, Dragu D, Neagu AI, Mambet C, Nedeianu S, et al. Recent advances in gastric cancer early diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 May 7;25(17):2029–44. Huang S, Guo Y, Li Z, Zhang Y, Zhou T, You W, et al. A systematic review of metabolomic profiling of gastric cancer and esophageal cancer. Cancer Biol Med. 2020 Feb 15;17(1):181–98. Tian J, Xue W, Yin H, Zhang N, Zhou J, Long Z, et al. Differential metabolic alterations and biomarkers between gastric cancer and colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:6093–108. Pan G, Ma Y, Suo J, Li W, Zhang Y, Qin S, et al. Discovering biomarkers in peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer by metabolomics. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:7199–211. Yu C, Zhang Q, Zou Y, Liu R, Zhao J, Bi K, et al. Across-polarity quantification method for broad metabolome coverage based on consecutive nanoconfined liquid phase nanoextraction technology: application in discovering the plasma potential biomarkers of different types of cancer. Anal Chim Acta. 2021 Jul 4;1167:338577. Lario S, Ramírez-Lázaro MJ, Sanjuan-Herráez D, Brunet-Vega A, Pericay C, Gombau L, et al. Plasma sample based analysis of gastric cancer progression using targeted metabolomics. Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 19;7(1):17774. Huang S, Guo Y, Li ZW, Shui G, Tian H, Li BW, et al. Identification and validation of plasma metabolomic signatures in precancerous gastric lesions that progress to cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2114186. Shimizu H, Usui Y, Asakage M, Nezu N, Wakita R, Tsubota K, et al. Serum metabolomic profiling of patients with non-infectious uveitis. J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 6;9(12):3955. Fuse S, Sugimoto M, Kurosawa Y, Kuroiwa M, Aita Y, Tomita A, et al. Relationships between plasma lipidomic profiles and brown adipose tissue density in humans. Int J Obes. 2020 Jun;44(6):1387–96. Sugimoto M, Kawakami M, Robert M, Soga T, Tomita M. Bioinformatics tools for mass spectroscopy-based metabolomic data processing and analysis. Curr Bioinform. 2012 Mar;7(1):96–108. Dunn WB, Broadhurst D, Begley P, Zelena E, Francis-McIntyre S, Anderson N, et al. Procedures for large-scale metabolic profiling of serum and plasma using gas chromatography and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc. 2011 Jun 30;6(7):1060–83. Joseph VR, Gul E, Ba S. Maximum projection designs for computer experiments. Biometrika. 2015;102(2):371–80. Chong J, Soufan O, Li C, Caraus I, Li S, Bourque G, et al. MetaboAnalyst 4.0: towards more transparent and integrative metabolomics analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jul 2;46(W1):W486–94. Yusefi AR, Bagheri Lankarani K, Bastani P, Radinmanesh M, Kavosi Z. Risk factors for gastric cancer: a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Mar 27;19(3):591–603. Hirayama A, Kami K, Sugimoto M, Sugawara M, Toki N, Onozuka H, et al. Quantitative metabolome profiling of colon and stomach cancer microenvironment by capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Cancer Res. 2009 Jun 1;69(11):4918–25. Adam J, Ramracheya R, Chibalina MV, Ternette N, Hamilton A, Tarasov AI, et al. Fumarate hydratase deletion in pancreatic beta cells leads to progressive diabetes. Cell Rep. 2017 Sep 26;20(13):3135–48. Zhang J, Wang YT, Miller JH, Day MM, Munger JC, Brookes PS. Accumulation of succinate in cardiac ischemia primarily occurs via canonical Krebs cycle activity. Cell Rep. 2018 May 29;23(9):2617–28. Xu L, You X, Cao Q, Huang M, Hong LL, Chen XL, et al. Polyamine synthesis enzyme AMD1 is closely associated with tumorigenesis and prognosis of human gastric cancers. Carcinogenesis. 2020 Apr 22;41(2):214–22. Sierra JC, Piazuelo MB, Luis PB, Barry DP, Allaman MM, Asim M, et al. Spermine oxidase mediates Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric inflammation, DNA damage, and carcinogenic signaling. Oncogene. 2020 May;39(22):4465–74. Xu H, Liu R, He B, Bi CW, Bi K, Li Q. Polyamine metabolites profiling for characterization of lung and liver cancer using an LC-tandem MS method with multiple statistical data mining strategies: discovering potential cancer biomarkers in human plasma and urine. Molecules. 2016 Aug 10;21(8):1040. Stark RM, Suleiman MS, Hassan IJ, Greenman J, Millar MR. Amino acid utilisation and deamination of glutamine and asparagine by Helicobacter pylori. J Med Microbiol. 1997 Sep;46(9):793–800. Chaturvedi R, de Sablet T, Peek RM, Wilson KT. Spermine oxidase, a polyamine catabolic enzyme that links Helicobacter pylori CagA and gastric cancer risk. Gut Microbes. 2012 Jan–Feb;3(1):48–56. Shimada H, Noie T, Ohashi M, Oba K, Takahashi Y. Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Gastric Cancer. 2014 Jan;17(1):26–33. Hamashima C; Systematic Review Group and Guideline Development Group for Gastric Cancer Screening Guidelines. Update version of the Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;48(7):673–83. Hagiwara H, Moki F, Yamashita Y, Saji K, Iesaki K, Suda H. Gastric cancer mortality related to direct radiographic and endoscopic screening: a retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 7;27(33):5595–609. Aftabi Y, Soleymani J, Jouyban A. Efficacy of analytical technologies in metabolomics studies of the gastrointestinal cancers. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2022;52(7):1593–605. Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Research Article

Received: September 18, 2021
Accepted: August 15, 2022
Published online: November 18, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 12
Number of Figures: 6
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0012-2823 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9867 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DIG

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif