The kids aren’t alright: The effects of medical marijuana market size on adolescents

Elsevier

Available online 11 November 2022, 102700

Journal of Health EconomicsAbstract

We exploit shocks to US federal enforcement policy to assess how legal medical marijuana market size affects youth marijuana use and consequences for youth traffic-related fatalities. Using hand-collected data on state medical marijuana patient rates to develop a novel measure of market size, we find that legal market growth increases youth marijuana use. Likely mechanisms are lower prices and easier access. Youth die more frequently from alcohol-involved car accidents, suggesting complementarities for youths. The consequences of marijuana legalization for youth are not immediate, but depend on how supply-side regulations affect production and prices.

Section snippetsYouth use and legal medical marijuana access

Youth marijuana use differs from adult use in several ways that interact with regulatory design. First, in the US, people under the age of 18 have very limited legal access to medical marijuana because all states have imposed legal age-limits of 18 years. While individuals under age 18 can qualify for medical marijuana, they have stricter qualifying standards and require parental consent.4

State markets and federal enforcement over time

As of December 2020, 36 states and Washington D.C. had enacted laws providing protections for the use of medical marijuana. In most states, medical marijuana patients must register in order to access medical marijuana and be protected from state arrest. While states vary slightly in the specific information required of applicants, typically individuals must obtain a physician’s certification that they have a qualifying medical condition, provide verification of residency, and submit an

Data

Our paper offers a novel measure of medical marijuana market size, the number of registered medical marijuana patients per capita. In this section, we discuss this measure in detail and summarize sources for the policy and outcome data.

Empirical framework

We use three main frameworks to assess how use and negative health externalities respond to medical marijuana market size. We first establish that our measure of market size responds to federal enforcement efforts. Next, we exploit this natural experiment to test how changes in market size affect youth use. Finally, we assess changes in fatal car accidents in response to changes in market size.

Results

We begin by presenting results from the first stage, where we relate changes in federal enforcement to medical marijuana patient registration rates. Next, we present results for marijuana consumption outcomes, as well as exploration of potential mechanisms that may drive these results. After exploring potential mechanisms, we assess mortality from motor vehicle accidents.

Conclusion

Using newly collected data and a novel identification strategy, we study how adolescent marijuana use and associated public health externalities change in response to medical marijuana market size. Contrary to prior research that focused on passage of MMLs and found no effect, we find youth marijuana use responds to medical marijuana market size. Our estimates suggest that if a state where marijuana is illegal were to reach the median per capita medical marijuana registration rate, past-month

References (75)HarperS. et al.Do medical marijuana laws increase marijuana use? Replication study and extension

Ann. Epidemiology

(2012)

HansenB. et al.Federalism, partial prohibition, and cross-border sales: Evidence from recreational marijuana

J. Public Econ.

(2020)

FairmanB.J. Trends in registered medical marijuana participation across 13 US States and district of Columbia

Drug Alcohol Depend.

(2016)

DowneyL.A. et al.The effects of cannabis and alcohol on simulated driving: Influences of dose and experience

Accid. Anal. Prev.

(2013)

DoremusJ.M. et al.Using recreational cannabis to treat insomnia: Evidence from over-the-counter sleep aid sales in Colorado

Complementary Therapies Med.

(2019)

D’AmicoE.J. et al.Planting the seed for marijuana use: Changes in exposure to medical marijuana advertising and subsequent adolescent marijuana use, cognitions, and consequences over seven years

Drug Alcohol Depend.

(2018)

CrostB. et al.The effect of alcohol availability on marijuana use: Evidence from the minimum legal drinking age

J. Health Econ.

(2012)

ChuY.-W.L. The effects of medical marijuana laws on illegal marijuana use

J. Health Econ.

(2014)

BoydC.J. et al.Adolescents’ use of medical marijuana: A secondary analysis of monitoring the future data

J. Adolescent Health

(2015)

AlfordC. Medical Marijuana Laws and Marijuana Markets

(2013)

AllisonP.D. et al.Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models

Sociol. Methodol.

(2002)

AmlungM. et al.Price elasticity of illegal versus legal cannabis: A behavioral economic substitutability analysis

Addiction

(2019)

AndersonD.M. et al.Medical marijuana laws, traffic fatalities, and alcohol consumption

J. Law Econ.

(2013)

AndersonD.M. et al.Medical marijuana laws and teen marijuana use

Am. Law Econ. Rev.

(2015)

AndersonD.M. et al.Association of marijuana laws with teen marijuana use: New estimates from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveys

JAMA Pediatrics

(2019)

AndersonD.M. et al.The legalization of recreational marijuana: How likely is the worst-case scenario?

J. Policy Anal. Manag.

(2014)

AndersonD.M. et al.The role of dispensaries: The devil is in the details

J. Policy Anal. Manag.

(2014)

AndersonD. et al.The public health effects of legalizing marijuana

J. Econ. Lit.

(2022)

AndersonD.M. et al.Notice of retraction and replacement. Anderson others association of marijuana legalization with marijuana use among US high school students, 1993–2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4 (9): e2124638

JAMA Netw. Open

(2022)

Arizona Department of Health ServicesD.M. Arizona Medical Marijuana Program March 2020 Monthly Report

(2020)

Berning, A., Smith, R., Drexler, M., Wochinger, K., 2022. Drug Testing and Traffic Safety: What You Need to Know....BertrandM. et al.How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?

Q. J. Econ.

(2004)

BorusyakK. et al.Revisiting event study designs: Robust and efficient estimation

(2021)

BradfordA.C. et al.Medical marijuana laws reduce prescription medication use in medicare Part D

Health Affairs

(2016)

CerdáM. et al.Association of state recreational marijuana laws with adolescent marijuana use

JAMA Pediatrics

(2017)

ChoiA. et al.Smoke gets in your eyes: Medical marijuana laws and tobacco cigarette use

Am. J. Health Econ.

(2019)

ColeJ.M. Guidance Regarding the Ogden Memo in Jurisdictions Seeking to Authorize Marijuana for Medical Use

(2011)

View full text

© 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif