Norcini JJ. Setting standards on educational tests. Med Educ. 2003;37(5):464–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

De Champlain A. Ensuring the competent are truly competent: an overview of common methods and procedures used to set standards on high stakes examinations. J Vet Med Educ. 2004;31(1):62–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dauphinee WD, Blackmore DE, Smee SM, Rothman AI, Reznick RK. Using the judgments of physician examiners in setting the standards for a national multi-center high stakes OSCE. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1997;2:201–11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wood TJ, Humphrey-Murto SM, Norman GR. Standard setting in a small scale OSCE: a comparison of the Modified Borderline-Group Method and the Borderline Regression Method. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2006;11(2):115–22.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kaufman DM, Mann KV, Muijtjens AM, van der Vleuten CP. A comparison of standard-setting procedures for an OSCE in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 2000;75(3):267–71.

Article  Google Scholar 

Reid KJ, Dodds A. Comparing the borderline group and borderline regression approaches to setting Objective Structured Clinical Examination cut scores. J Contemp Med Educ. 2014;2(1):8–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

De Champlain AF. Standard setting methods in medical education. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. 2013:305–16.

Kane M. Choosing between examinee-centered and test-centered standard-setting methods. Educ Assess. 1998;5(3):129–45.

Article  Google Scholar 

Livingston SA, Zieky MJ. Passing scores: A manual for setting standards of performance on educational and occupational tests. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ. 1982.

Cohen AS, Kane MT, Crooks TJ. A generalized examinee-centered method for setting standards on achievement tests. Appl Measur Educ. 1999;12(4):343–66.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kane MT. Conducting examinee-centered standard-setting studies based on standards of practice. The Bar Examiner. 2002;71(4):6–13.

Google Scholar 

Schoonheim-Klein M, Muijtjens A, Habets L, Manogue M, Van Der Vleuten C, Van der Velden U. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods. Eur J Dent Educ. 2009;13(3):162–71.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kramer A, Muijtjens A, Jansen K, Düsman H, Tan L, Van Der Vleuten C. Comparison of a rational and an empirical standard setting procedure for an OSCE. Med Educ. 2003;37(2):132–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hejri SM, Jalili M, Muijtjens AM, Van Der Vleuten CP. Assessing the reliability of the borderline regression method as a standard setting procedure for objective structured clinical examination. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(10):887.

Google Scholar 

Stone GE, Beltyukova S, Fox CM. Objective standard setting for judge-mediated examinations. Int J Test. 2008;8(2):180–96.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bond TG, Yan Z, Stone G, Beltyukova S. Making measures, setting standards, and Rasch regression. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences: Routledge; 2015. p. 187–225.

Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2015.

Book  Google Scholar 

Linacre JM. Facets computer program for many-facet Rasch measurement, version 3.71. 4. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps. com. 2013.

Linacre JM. Size vs significance: standardized chi-square fit statistic. Rasch Meas Trans. 2003;17(1):918.

Google Scholar 

Wright B. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;8:370.

Google Scholar 

Eckes T. Many-facet Rasch measurement. In: Aryadoust V, Raquel M, editors. Quantitative data analysis for language assessment volume I: fundamental techniques. Routledge; 2019.

Linacre JM. Facets computer program for many-facet Rasch measurement, version 3.84.0. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com; 2022.

Brennan RL. Manual for BB-CLASS: a computer program that uses the beta-binomial model for classification consistency and accuracy. Version 1. https://education.uiowa.edu/casma/computer-programs. GENOVA is a ANSI FORTRAN computer program for univariate generalizability analyses with complete, balanced designs. It has both G study and D study capabilities. GENOVA was designed by R. L. Brennan and coded by J. E. Crick in the early 1980s. Center for Advanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment. 2004.

McDonald RP. Test theory: a unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1999.

Google Scholar 

Livingston SA, Lewis C. Estimating the consistency and accuracy of classifications based on test scores. J Educ Meas. 1995;32(2):179–97.

Article  Google Scholar 

Humphrey-Murto S, MacFadyen JC. Standard setting: a comparison of case-author and modified borderline-group methods in a small-scale OSCE. Acad Med. 2002;77(7):729–32.

Article  Google Scholar 

Boursicot KA, Roberts TE, Pell G. Using borderline methods to compare passing standards for OSCEs at graduation across three medical schools. Med Educ. 2007;41(11):1024–31.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sebok SS, Roy M, Klinger DA, De Champlain AF. Examiners and content and site: Oh My! A national organization’s investigation of score variation in large-scale performance assessments. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2015;20(3):581–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Homer M, Pell G, Fuller R, Patterson J. Quantifying error in OSCE standard setting for varying cohort sizes: a resampling approach to measuring assessment quality. Med Teach. 2016;38(2):181–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Swanson DB, van der Vleuten CP. Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: state of the art revisited. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(sup1):S17–25.

Article  Google Scholar 

Joint Committee on the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing of the American Educational Research Association, the American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. 1430 K St., NW, Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20005