Chess LE, Gagnier J (2013) Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:76
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Charrois TL (2015) Systematic reviews: what do you need to know to get started? Can J Hosp Pharm 68(2):144–148
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Moher D, Oxman AD et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA et al (2001) The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 54:651–654
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Olivo SA, Macedo LG, Gadotti IC, Fuentes J, Stanton T, Magee DJ (2008) Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Phys Ther 88(2):156–175
RoB 2: A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials. Accessed 15 June 2021
Dulai SK, Slobogean BL, Beauchamp RD, Mulpuri K (2007) A quality assessment of randomized clinical trials in pediatric orthopaedics. J Pediatr Orthop 27(5):573–581
Dodwell E, Dua S, Dulai SK, Astone K, Mulpuri K (2015) The quality of randomized controlled trials in pediatric orthopaedics: are we improving? J Pediatr Orthop 35(5):536–545
Zhang J, Chen X, Zhu Q, Cui J, Cao L, Su J (2016) Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials: a survey of seven core journals of orthopaedics from Mainland China over 5 years following the CONSORT statement. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102(7):933–938
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
De Moraes VY, Moreira CD, Tamaoki MJS, Faloppa F, Belloti JC (2010) Randomized controlled trials in orthopedics and traumatology: systematic analysis on the national evidence. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition) 45(6):601–605
Esposito M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV, Jokstad A (2001) Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of oral implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16(6):783–792
Moraschini V, Barboza ES (2016) Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar socket preservation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(9):1126–1134
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chaudhry K, Bali RK, Kaur A, Tiwari RVC, Patnana AK (2021) Level of evidence analysis in Journal of Maxillofacial Oral Surgery: a twelve-year bibliometric analysis of 1300 publications (2009–2020). J Maxillofac Oral Surg 20(3):364–372
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, Niu Y, Du L (2015) The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med 8(1):2–10
Lim CY, In J (2019) Randomization in clinical studies [published correction appears in Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug;72(4):396]. Korean J Anesthesiol 72(3):221–232
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kang M, Ragan BG, Park JH (2008) Issues in outcomes research: an overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials. J Athl Train 43(2):215–221
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jadad AR, Moher D, Klassen TP (1998) Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: II. How did the authors find the studies and assess their quality? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 152(8):812–817
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, Tugwell P, Klassen TP (1998) Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352(9128):609–613
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, Smith H Jr (1983) Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med 309(22):1358–1361
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schulz KF (2001) Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother? Evid Based Nurs 4:4–6
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fielding S, Ogbuagu A, Sivasubramaniam S, MacLennan G, Ramsay CR (2016) Reporting and dealing with missing quality of life data in RCTs: has the picture changed in the last decade? Qual Life Res 25(12):2977–2983
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Montori VM, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Manns BJ, Ghali WA, Guyatt GH (2002) In the dark. The reporting of blinding status in randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 55:787–790
Vorland CJ, Brown AW, Dawson JA et al (2021) Errors in the implementation, analysis, and reporting of randomization within obesity and nutrition research: a guide to their avoidance. Int J Obes 45:2335–2346
Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, Bloom J, Chan AW, Cronin E, Williamson PR (2008) Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003081
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Haahr M, Hróbjartsson A (2006) Who is blinded in randomised clinical trials? A study of 200 trials and a survey of authors. Clin Trials 3:360–365
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT (2010) statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010(23):332–340
留言 (0)