Graczyk EL, Resnik L, Schiefer MA, Schmitt MS, Tyler DJ. Home use of a neural-connected sensory prosthesis provides the functional and psychosocial experience of having a hand again. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26952-x.
Page DM, George JA, Kluger DT, Duncan C, Wendelken S, Davis T, et al. Motor control and sensory feedback enhance prosthesis embodiment and reduce phantom pain after long-term hand amputation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12(September):1–16.
Rognini G, Petrini FM, Raspopovic S, Valle G, Granata G, Strauss I, et al. Multisensory bionic limb to achieve prosthesis embodiment and reduce distorted phantom limb perceptions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90(7):833–6.
D’Anna E, Valle G, Mazzoni A, Strauss I, Iberite F, Patton J, et al. A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback. Sci Robot. 2019;4(27):1–21.
Bekrater-Bodmann R. Factors associated with prosthesis embodiment and its importance for prosthetic satisfaction in lower limb amputees. Front Neurorobot. 2021;14(January):1–14.
Gouzien A, De Vignemont F, Touillet A, Martinet N, De Graaf J, Jarrassé N, et al. Reachability and the sense of embodiment in amputees using prostheses. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–10.
Mohamad Hanif NHH, Chappell PH, White NM, Cranny AW. A psychophysical investigation on vibrotactile sensing for transradial prosthesis users. Cogent Eng. 2018;5(1):1–14.
Engdahl SM, Meehan SK, Gates DH. Differential experiences of embodiment between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–10.
Zbinden J, Lendaro E, Ortiz-Catalan M. Prosthetic embodiment: systematic review on definitions, measures, and experimental paradigms. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022;19(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01006-6.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Botvinick M, Cohen J. Rubber hands feel touch that eyes see. Nature. 1998;391(6669):756–756.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kalckert A, Henrik EH. Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: a dissociation of ownership and agency. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;2012(6):1–14.
Ehrsson HH. Multisensory processes in body ownership. In: Sathian K, Ramachandran VS, editors. Multisensory perception: from laboratory to clinic. Academic Press: Elsevier; 2020. p. 179–200.
Wen W. Does delay in feedback diminish sense of agency? A review. Conscious Cogn. 2019;73:102759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.05.007.
Abdulkarim Z. Limb ownership and voluntary action: human behavioral and neuroimaging studies. PQDT - Global. 2020; 84.
Bekrater-Bodmann R, Foell J, Diers M, Kamping S, Rance M, Kirsch P, et al. The importance of synchrony and temporal order of visual and tactile input for illusory limb ownership experiences—an fMRI study applying virtual reality. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e87013.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shimada S, Fukuda K, Hiraki K. Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(7):1–5.
Lloyd DM. Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain Cogn. 2007;64(1):104–9.
Kalckert A, Ehrsson HH. The spatial distance rule in the moving and classical rubber hand illusions. Conscious Cogn. 2014;30:118–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.022.
Kalckert A, Perera ATM, Ganesan Y, Tan E. Rubber hands in space: the role of distance and relative position in the rubber hand illusion. Exp Brain Res. 2019;237(7):1821–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05539-6.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J. Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol Sci. 2000;11(5):353–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tsakiris M, Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005;31(1):80–91.
Ide M. The effect of “anatomical plausibility” of hand angle on the rubber-hand illusion. Perception. 2013;42(1):103–11.
Tsakiris M, Carpenter L, James D, Fotopoulou A. Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Exp Brain Res. 2010;204(3):343–52.
Haans A, Isselsteijn WA, de Kort YAW. The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. Body Image. 2008;5(4):389–94.
Guterstam A, Gentile G, Ehrsson HH. The invisible hand illusion: multisensory integration leads to the embodiment of a discrete volume of empty space. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013;25(7):1078–99.
Farmer H, Tajadura-Jiménez A, Tsakiris M. Beyond the colour of my skin: how skin colour affects the sense of body-ownership. Conscious Cogn. 2012;21(3):1242–56.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rosén B, Ehrsson HH, Antfolk C, Cipriani C, Sebelius F, Lundborg G. Referral of sensation to an advanced humanoid robotic hand prosthesis. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43(5):260–6.
Ward J, Mensah A, Jünemann K. The rubber hand illusion depends on the tactile congruency of the observed and felt touch. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015;41(5):1203–8.
Chancel M, Ehrsson HH. Which hand is mine? Discriminating body ownership perception in a two-alternative forced-choice task. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020;82(8):4058–83.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wen W, Imamizu H. The sense of agency in perception, behaviour and human–machine interactions. Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(4):211–22.
Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Newen A. Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Conscious Cogn. 2008;17(1):219–39.
Frith CD, Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM. Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2000;355(1404):1771–88.
Desantis A, Roussel C, Waszak F. On the influence of causal beliefs on the feeling of agency. Conscious Cogn. 2011;20(4):1211–20.
Dogge M, Schaap M, Custers R, Wegner DM, Aarts H. When moving without volition: Implied self-causation enhances binding strength between involuntary actions and effects. Conscious Cogn. 2012;21(1):501–6.
Vastano R, Deschrijver E, Pozzo T, Brass M. Temporal binding effect in the action observation domain: evidence from an action-based somatosensory paradigm. Conscious Cogn. 2017;2018(60):1–8.
Antusch S, Custers R, Marien H, Aarts H. Studying the sense of agency in the absence of motor movement: an investigation into temporal binding of tactile sensations and auditory effects. Exp Brain Res. 2021;239(6):1795–806.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Krugwasser R, Harel EV, Salomon R. The boundaries of the self: the sense of agency across different sensorimotor aspects. J Vis. 2019;19(4):1–11.
Shimada S, Hiraki K, Oda I. The parietal role in the sense of self-ownership with temporal discrepancy between visual and proprioceptive feedbacks. Neuroimage. 2005;24(4):1225–32.
Shimada S, Qi Y, Hiraki K. Detection of visual feedback delay in active and passive self-body movements. Exp Brain Res. 2010;201(2):359–64.
Ebert JP, Wegner DM. Time warp: authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events. Conscious Cogn. 2010;19(1):481–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.002.
Farrer C, Valentin G, Hupé JM. The time windows of the sense of agency. Conscious Cogn. 2013;22(4):1431–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.09.010.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wen W, Yamashita A, Asama H. The influence of action-outcome delay and arousal on sense of agency and the intentional binding effect. Conscious Cogn. 2015;36:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.004.
Farrer C, Bouchereau M, Jeannerod M, Franck N. Effect of distorted visual feedback on the sense of agency. Behav Neurol. 2008;19(1–2):53–7.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Karsh N, Eitam B, Mark I, Higgins ET, et al. General bootstrapping agency: how control-relevant information affects motivation. J Exp Psychol. 2016;145(10):1333.
留言 (0)