Teclistamab: First Approval

Pharmacodynamics

Teclistamab works by redirecting CD3-positive T cells to MM cells that express BCMA to induce cytotoxicity and tumour cell death [3]. This targeting of BCMA is effective as BCMA is overexpressed and activated in MM [11], and is mediated by the secretion of perforin and certain granzymes from cytotoxic T cells [3]. This process is non-specific and does not involve major histocompatibility complex class 1 molecules on antigen-presenting cells [3].

Treatment with teclistamab for less than one month resulted in the activation and redistribution of T cells, a reduction in B cells and the induction of serum cytokines [3]. Reductions in soluble BCMA levels were also seen within one month of treatment [3]. The extent of the reduction was correlated to the depth of patient response, as patients who had achieved complete response (CR) or stringent CR had the greatest reductions from baseline in soluble BCMA levels [11].

Results from an ex vivo cytotoxicity assay demonstrated 1.5 mg/kg once weekly of SC teclistamab was the first dosage level to have teclistamab exposure levels above target with no significant effects on the safety profile [12].

Pharmacokinetics

Following SC administration in a phase I/II trial (MajesTEC-1) in patients with R/R MM [1], teclistamab showed approximately dose-proportional pharmacokinetics (PKs) at a dose range of 0.08–3.0 mg/kg/dose [3]. Steady state was reached at the seventh weekly maintenance dose of teclistamab. At steady state, the maximum drug concentration (Cmax) was 25.3 μg/mL and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve during the weekly dosing interval was 3905 μg·h/mL; the accumulation ratios were 2.71- and 3.05-fold, respectively. Time to reach Cmax was 48.9 h. Compared to intravenous teclistamab, administration of SC teclistamab resulted in a mean bioavailability of 69% [3].

Features and properties of teclistamab Alternative names BCMAxCD3-Genmab/Janssen Research & Development; JNJ 7957; JNJ-64007957; TECVAYLI Class Antineoplastics; Bispecific antibodies; Immunotherapies Mechanism of action Antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity; cytotoxic T lymphocyte stimulants Route of administration Intravenous, parenteral, subcutaneous Pharmacodynamics Binds to CD3 receptors on both T cells and B cell maturation antigen (BCMA; expressed on malignant multiple myeloma B cells), bringing CD3+ T cells and BCMA+ cells together and activating T cells; results in BCMA+ cell lysis and death Majority of teclistamab recipients had reduced soluble BCMA levels within 1 month of treatment Pharmacokinetics Steady-state Cmax 25.3 μg/mL and AUCτ 3905 μg·h/mL; mean volumes of distribution 4.13 L (central compartment) and 1.34 (peripheral compartment); mean clearance 0.449 L (time-independent) Adverse reactions  Most frequent (all-cause) Hypogammaglobulinaemia, cytokine release syndrome, neutropenia, anaemia musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, thrombocytopenia (≥ 40% of patients)  Adverse reactions of special interest Cytokine release syndrome, neurological toxicities (including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome), infections ATC codes  WHO ATC code L01X-C (Monoclonal antibodies)  EphMRA ATC code L1G (Monoclonal Antibody Antineoplastics) Chemical name Immunoglobulin G4 (233-proline, 239-alanine, 240-alanine, 410-leucine)

Based on a two-compartment population PK model, the mean volume of distribution for the central compartment was 4.13 L (and 1.34 L for the peripheral compartment) [3]. The mean time-independent clearance of teclistamab was 0.449 L/day; time-dependent clearance was ≈ 43% of total baseline clearance, and reduced to < 10% at week 8 of treatment. The population PK model showed the serum concentration of teclistamab was not significantly affected by soluble BCMA levels [3].

While formal studies in special populations are lacking, population PK analyses show teclistamab PKs were not affected by sex, age (24–84 years), mild-to-moderate kidney dysfunction or mild hepatic impairment. PK data in patients with severe kidney dysfunction or moderate-to-severe hepatic impairment are lacking [3].

Therapeutic Trials

Conditional approval of teclistamab was based on an ongoing, first-in-human, open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase I/II trial (NCT03145181, NCT04557098; MajesTEC-1) in which deep and durable responses to teclistamab were seen in patients with R/R MM [1, 13]. In phase 1 of the study (during the dose-escalation portion), different patient cohorts received either intravenous teclistamab (0.3−19.2 µg/kg once every 2 weeks or 19.2−720 µg/kg once weekly; n = 84) or SC teclistamab (80−3000 µg/kg once weekly; n = 73), with step-up titration for doses ≥ 38.4 µg/kg [1]. The purpose of this phase was to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; 1.5 mg/kg once weekly of SC teclistamab after 0.06 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg step-up doses); 40 patients were treated at this dose [1]. Results from cohorts who received intravenous teclistamab or SC teclistamab at doses other than the RP2D are not discussed further.

Key clinical trials of teclistamab in multiple myeloma Drug(s) Phase Status Location(s) Identifier Sponsor(s) Teclistamab IV Completed USA   Janssen Research & Development Teclistamab IV Active, no longer recruiting Global NCT04035226, LocoMMotion Janssen-Cilag Ltd., Legend Biotech Teclistamab, bortezomib, daratumumab/hyaluronidase, dexamethasone, pomalidomide III Recruiting Global NCT05083169, EudraCT2020-004742-11, MajesTEC-3 Janssen Research & Development Teclistamab, lenalidomide III Not yet recruiting Global NCT05243797, EudraCT2021-002531-27, MajesTEC-4 Janssen Pharmaceutica, European Myeloma Network Teclistamab II Recruiting USA NCT05469893, Immuno-PRISM Janssen Research & Development Teclistamab, daratumumab, dexamethasone II Not yet recruiting USA NCT05231629, MASTER-2 Janssen Scientific Affairs, University of Alabama at Birmingham Teclistamab I/II Recruiting Global NCT03145181, NCT04557098, EudraCT2016-002122-36, MajesTEC-1 Janssen Research & Development Teclistamab I/II Recruiting Japan NCT04696809 Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. Teclistamab, daratumumab, pomalidomide, talquetamab Ib Recruiting Global NCT04108195, EudraCT2019-000330-19, TRIMM-2 Janssen Research & Development Teclistamab, bortezomib, daratumumab, lenalidomide, nirogacestat, pomalidomide Ib Recruiting Global NCT04722146, EudraCT2020-004404-33, MajesTEC-2 Janssen Research & Development, SpringWorks Therapeutics Teclistamab, talquetamab Ib Recruiting Global NCT05338775, EudraCT2021-005073-22, TRIMM-3 Janssen Research & Development Teclistamab, daratumumab, talquetamab Ib Recruiting Global NCT04586426, EudraCT2019-004124-38, RedirecTT-1 Janssen Research & Development

After a median follow up of 6.1 months, patients who received the RP2D achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 65% [1]. Forty percent of patients who received the RP2D achieved a CR or better, and the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 67%. The ORR was 61% in patients who were triple-class refractory and received the RP2D of teclistamab (n = 33). The median time to first confirmed response was 1 month, and 3 months to first confirmed CR or better [1].

Eligibility criteria into this phase of the trial included age ≥ 18 years, a diagnosis of MM that was R/R or intolerant to established therapies, previous treatment with a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug but no BCMA-targeted therapy, had measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 or 1 [1].

In phase 2 of the study, treatment with teclistamab (at the RP2D established in phase 1) resulted in deep and durable response in patients with triple-class-exposed R/R MM (n = 125) [13]. At primary analysis (median follow up 14.1 months), the primary efficacy endpoint of overall response was achieved by 63.0% of patients; CR or better was achieved by 39.4%. The median duration of response was 18.4 months [13]. Updated phase 2 efficacy results (data cutoff 9 Nov 2021) were consistent with the primary analysis; the ORR was 64%, and 30% of patients achieved a CR or better [14]. The 12-month duration of response rate was 66% [14].

This second phase of the trial enrolled patients aged ≥ 18 years with R/R MM who had previously received ≥ 3 lines of treatment (including an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor and an anti-CD38 antibody) with no prior exposure to a BCMA-targeted therapy, had measurable and progressive disease and an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 [13].

Overall, treatment with teclistamab in MajesTEC-1 improved patient health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), consistent with the clinical outcomes in the study [15]. Patient-reported outcomes from baseline to cycle 8 of treatment showed improvements in global health status scores, overall health (as assessed by a visual analogue scale), physical function and symptoms of pain and fatigue [15].

Clinical data from an ongoing open-label, multicentre, multicohort, phase Ib trial (NCT04108195; TRIMM-2) indicates SC teclistamab may be effective when used in combination with SC daratumumab in patients with R/R MM who have received ≥ 3 prior lines of treatment (n = 37); the ORR was 78%, with 73% of patients achieving very good partial response (VGPR) or better [16].

Real world studies

As MajesTEC-1 did not have a control arm, several real world studies have evaluated the efficacy of teclistamab in comparison to standard treatments. Compared to patients who received real-world treatments in a national de-identified electronic health record-derived Flatiron Health MM cohort database, teclistamab recipients had significantly (p < 0.0001) longer PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.43] and time to next treatment (HR 0.42). Patients in this database had triple-class exposed R/R MM, had received ≥ 3 prior lines of treatment and recently started a new line of therapy [17].

In the first prospective, multicentre, real-life standard of care, phase IV trial (NCT04035226; LocoMMotion) in triple-class exposed patients with R/R MM (n = 248), patients who met MajesTEC-1 eligibility criteria were used as an external control arm for MajesTEC-1. SC teclistamab demonstrated superior efficacy over treatments used in real-world clinical practice with regards to ORR, VGPR rate or CR or better rate (response-rate ratios 2.31–91.50; all p < 0.0001) [18]. Duration of response and PFS were both significantly improved in teclistamab recipients (HR 0.17 and 0.47, respectively; both p < 0.0001) [18]. However, improvements in HR-QOL were limited in LocoMMotion patients, particular in the reduction of pain [19].

Adverse Events

Treatment with SC teclistamab was generally tolerable in patients with R/R MM, as demonstrated in the phase I/II MajesTEC-1 trial [1, 13]. In the dose-expansion portion of phase 1 of MajesTEC-1, the safety and tolerability of teclistamab were investigated and found to be well tolerated [1]. In patients who received the RP2D, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 70% of patients) and neutropenia (65% of patients) [1].

In phase 2 of the study (n = 165 for the safety population), all patients experienced AEs and 94.5% of patients experienced grade 3–4 AEs [13]. The most common any-grade AEs (≥ 40.0% of patients) were infections (76.4%), hypogammaglobulinemia (74.5%), CRS (72.1%), neutropenia (70.9%), anaemia (52.1%) and thrombocytopenia (40.0%). Grade 3–4 AEs were most commonly (> 20% of patients) neutropenia (64.2%), infections (44.8%), anaemia (37.0%), lymphopenia (32.7%) and thrombocytopenia (21.2%) [13].

Serious AEs occurred in 64.8% of patients; these were most commonly (> 5% of patients) Covid-19 (14.5%), pneumonia (10.3%), CRS (8.5%), general deterioration in physical health (5.5%) and pyrexia (5.5%) [13]. Treatment discontinuation was reported in two patients (1.2%) due to grade 3–4 AEs (adenoviral pneumonia and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy). Treatment was skipped or reduced due to AEs in 63.0% and 0.6% of patients, respectively. Death was reported for 68 patients (41.2% of safety population), mostly due to progressive disease (60.3% of deaths). Death due to an AE was reported for 19 patients (27.9% of deaths); five deaths were considered treatment-related (due to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, Covid-19, hepatic failure, streptococcal pneumonia) [13].

AEs of special interest (AESIs) include CRS and neurological toxicities [3]. Of the patients who developed CRS, the most common (> 10% of patients) signs and symptoms were fever (72%), hypoxia (13%), chills (12%) and hypotension (12%). These occurred mostly during the first three doses of teclistamab. Only 0.6% of CRS events were grade 3. Median time to onset and median duration were both 2 days. CRS was most commonly managed with tocilizumab and/or corticosteroids. The most common neurological toxicity in MajesTEC-1 was headache (8% of patients) [3]. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was reported in 3% of patients and almost all cases (77.8%) were concurrent with CRS (during or ≤ 7 days after resolution of CRS) [3, 13]. Median time to onset of ICANS was 4 days following a dose, with a median duration of 3 days [3]. Other AESIs include infections, hypogammaglobulinaemia, hepatitis B virus reactivation, vaccine efficacy and neutropenia [3].

The tolerability profile of teclistamab after ≈ 9 months of follow up in MajesTEC-1 was consistent with earlier analyses, and no new safety signals were seen [14].

Immunogenicity was assessed in 238 patients from MajesTEC-1; one patient (0.4%) developed low-titre neutralizing antibodies to teclistamab treatment [3].

In the safety population of the TRIMM-2 trial (n = 46), most (91%) patients experienced at least one AE, which were most commonly infections (63% of patients), CRS (61%), neutropenia (54%), anaemia (46%), thrombocytopenia (33%) and diarrhoea (33%) [16]. Grade 3–4 AEs were reported in 78% of patients; the most frequent included neutropenia (50% of patients), anaemia, thrombocytopenia and infections (all 28%). One case of ICANS was fully resolved [16].

Ongoing Clinical Trials

A multicentre, randomized, open-label, phase III trial (NCT05243797; MajesTEC-4) will be investigating the efficacy and safety of teclistamab plus lenalidomide, compared with lenalidomide alone, as maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed MM. An ongoing, randomized, open-label, multicentre, phase III trial (NCT05083169; MajesTEC-3) is assessing the efficacy of teclistamab plus daratumumab, compared with investigator’s choice of daratumumab plus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone or bortezomib plus dexamethasone, in patients with R/R MM [20]. The primary efficacy endpoint is progression-free survival [20].

A multiple arm, randomized, phase II platform study (NCT05469893; Immuno-PRISM) is currently recruiting to evaluate the efficacy of teclistamab compared with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with high-risk smouldering MM. A randomized, open-label, sequential assignment, phase II trial (NCT05231629; MASTER-2) will assess the efficacy of teclistamab plus autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) plus daratumumab compared with AHCT plus lenalidomide plus daratumumab in patients with newly diagnosed MM.

A phase I/II trial (NCT04696809) is currently recruiting Japanese patients with R/R MM to evaluate teclistamab at the recommended phase 2 dose (previously identified in phase 1 of MajesTEC-1).

Several phase Ib trials are ongoing to investigate the efficacy and safety of teclistamab as part of combination therapy for patient with R/R MM. A non-randomized, open-label, multicentre, phase Ib trial (NCT04722146; MajesTEC-2) is investigating the optimal dose(s) of teclistamab in combination with bortezomib, daratumumab, lenalidomide, nirogacestat and/or pomalidomide. The open-label, sequentially-assigned, multicentre, phase Ib TRIMM-3 trial (NCT05338775) is identifying the optimal safe dose(s) of a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor in combination with teclistamab or talquetamab. An open-label, multicentre, phase Ib, dose-escalation trial (NCT04586426; RedirecTT-1) is assessing the recommended dosages and safety of teclistamab plus talquetamab, with or without daratumumab.

All trials summarized in Sects. 2.3 and 2.4 are ongoing.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif