Management of Radiographic Lesions of the Breast

Strax P. Venet L. Shapiro S.

Value of mammography in reduction of mortality from breast cancer in mass screening.

Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1973; 117: 686-689Scatliff J.H. Morris P.J.

From Roentgen to magnetic resonance imaging: the history of medical imaging.

N C Med J. 2014; 75: 111-113

The evolution of breast imaging: past to present B N joe.

Edward Sickles Radiol. 2014; 273Pisano E.D. Gatsonis C. Hendrick E. et al.

Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 1773-1783

Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.

Radiology. 2010; 257: 246-253Dershaw D.D. Fleischman R.C. Liberman L. et al.

Use of digital mammography in needle localization procedures.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 161: 559-562

Digital breast tomosynthesis: update on technology, evidence, and clinical practice.

Radiographics. 2021; 41: 321-337Chong A. Weinstein S.P. McDonald E.S. et al.

Digital breast tomosynthesis: concepts and clinical practice.

Radiology. 2019; 292: 1-14Taylor K.J. Merritt C. Piccoli C. et al.

Ultrasound as a complement to mammography and breast examination to characterize breast masses.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002; 28: 19-26Berg W.A. Blume J.D. Cormack J.B. et al.

Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

JAMA. 2008; 299: 2151-2163Berg W.A. Blume J.D. Cormack J.B. et al.

Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization.

Radiology. 2006; 241: 355-365Price E.R. Hargreaves J. Lipson J.A. et al.

The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation.

Radiology. 2013; 269: 887-892

Screening breast ultrasound:update after 10 years of breast density notification laws.

AJR. 2020; 214: 1424-1435Kolb T.M. Lichy J. Newhouse J.H.

Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

Radiology. 2002; 225: 165-175Berg W.A. Zhang Z. Lehrer D. et al.

Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.

JAMA. 2012; 307: 1394-1404Harvey J.A. Yaffe M.J. D’Orsi C. et al.

Density and breast cancer risk.

Radiology. 2013; 267: 657-658Yi A. Jang M. Yim D. et al.

Addition of screening breast US to digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.

Radiology. 2021; 298: 568-575Lee C.H. Dershaw D.D. Kopans D. et al.

Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2010; 7: 18-27Raber B. Bea V.J. Bedrosian I.

How Does MR Imaging Help Care for My Breast Cancer Patient? Perspective of a Surgical Oncologist.

Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2018; 26: 281-288Reig B. Lewin A.A. Du L. et al.

Breast MRI for Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Radiographics. 2021; 41: 665-679

Evaluation of breast silicone implants.

Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013; 21: 547-560Jochelson M.S. Lobbes M.B.I.

Contrast-enhanced mammography: state of the art.

Radiology. 2021; 299: 36-48

Nuclear breast imaging: clinical results and future directions.

JNM. 2016; 57: 46S-52SKuhl C.K. Schrading S. Strobel K. et al.

Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI.

J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 2304-2310Zhu Y. O’Connell A.M. Yue M. et al.

Dedicated breast CT: state of the art—part I. Historical evolution and technical aspects.

Eur Radiol. 2022; 32: 1579-1589

Standardized mammography reporting.

Radiol Clin North Am. 1992; 30: 257-264Burnside E.S. Sickles E.A. Bassett L.W. et al.

The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2009; 6 (51): 851-860

Periodic mam) [ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system.

American College of Radiology, Reston (VA)2013

Centennial dissertation. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174: 1191-1199Portnow L.H. Thornton C.M. Milch H.S. et al.

Biopsy marker standardization: what’s in a name?.

AJR. 2019; 212: 1400-1405

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif