Choi BB. Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI and diffusion-weighted image as predictors of lymphovascular invasion in node-negative invasive breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2021;19(1):76.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang W, Xue L, Li Y, Jiang J, Zhong Y, Wang S, Jiang L. Value of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in predicting extramural venous invasion in locally advanced gastric cancer and prognostic significance. Quant imaging Med Surg. 2021;11(1):328–40.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen X, Yang Z, Yang J, Liao Y, Pang P, Fan W, Chen X. Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts lymphovascular invasion and disease outcome in gastric cancer: a preliminary study. Cancer imaging: the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society. 2020;20(1):24.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hamy AS, Lam GT, Laas E, Darrigues L, Balezeau T, Guerin J, Livartowski A, Sadacca B, Pierga JY, Vincent-Salomon A, et al. Lymphovascular invasion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is strongly associated with poor prognosis in breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;169(2):295–304.

Article  Google Scholar 

Invernizzi M, Corti C, Lopez G, Michelotti A, Despini L, Gambini D, Lorenzini D, Guerini-Rocco E, Maggi S, Noale M, et al: Lymphovascular invasion and extranodal tumour extension are risk indicators of breast cancer related lymphoedema: an observational retrospective study with long-term follow-up. BMC cancer 2018, 18(1):935.

Zhang S, Zhang D, Yi S, Gong M, Lu C, Cai Y, Tang X, Zou L. The relationship of lymphatic vessel density, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(2):2863–73.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hwang KT, Kim YA, Kim J, Chu AJ, Chang JH, Oh SW, Hwang KR, Chai YJ. The influences of peritumoral lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion on the survival and recurrence according to the molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;163(1):71–82.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Wáng YXJ, Wang X, Wu P, Wang Y, Chen W, Chen H, Li J. Topics on quantitative liver magnetic resonance imaging. Quant imaging Med Surg. 2019;9(11):1840–90.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fan WX, Chen XF, Cheng FY, Cheng YB, Xu T, Zhu WB, Zhu XL, Li GJ, Li S. Retrospective analysis of the utility of multiparametric MRI for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions in women in China. Med (Baltim). 2018;97(4):e9666.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen Y, Yang X, Wen Z, Liu Y, Lu B, Yu S, Xiao X. Association between high-resolution MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion and tumour microcirculation estimated by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in rectal cancer: preliminary results. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):498.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ma Z, Liang C, Huang Y, He L, Liang C, Chen X, Huang X, Xiong Y, Liu Z. Can lymphovascular invasion be predicted by preoperative multiphasic dynamic CT in patients with advanced gastric cancer? Eur Radiol. 2017;27(8):3383–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lee SJ, Ko KH, Jung HK, Koh JE, Park AY. The additional utility of ultrafast MRI on conventional DCE-MRI in evaluating preoperative MRI of breast cancer patients. Eur J Radiol. 2020;124:108841.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhong M, Yang Z, Chen X, Huang R, Wang M, Fan W, Dai Z, Chen X. Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Improves the Differentiation of Breast Cancer Receptor Statuses Compared With Conventional Diffusion-Weighted Imaging. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI 2022.

Cheon H, Kim HJ, Lee SM, Cho SH, Shin KM, Kim GC, Park JY, Kim WH. Preoperative MRI features associated with lymphovascular invasion in node-negative invasive breast cancer: A propensity-matched analysis. J Magn Reson imaging: JMRI. 2017;46(4):1037–44.

Article  Google Scholar 

Igarashi T, Furube H, Ashida H, Ojiri H. Breast MRI for prediction of lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol. 2018;107:111–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim JY, Kim SH, Kim YJ, Kang BJ, An YY, Lee AW, Song BJ, Park YS, Lee HB. Enhancement parameters on dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: do they correlate with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers? Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33(1):72–80.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ouyang FS, Guo BL, Huang XY, Ouyang LZ, Zhou CR, Zhang R, Wu ML, Yang ZS, Wu SK, Guo TD, et al. A nomogram for individual prediction of vascular invasion in primary breast cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2019;110:30–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yang Z, Chen X, Zhang T, Cheng F, Liao Y, Chen X, Dai Z, Fan W. Quantitative Multiparametric MRI as an Imaging Biomarker for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Receptor Status and Molecular Subtypes. Frontiers in oncology 2021, 11(3692).

Chen X, Chen X, Yang J, Li Y, Fan W, Yang Z. Combining Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps for a Radiomics Nomogram to Predict Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020;44(2):275–83.

Article  Google Scholar 

Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.

Article  Google Scholar 

Herrmann KH, Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Krumbein I, Geppert C, Kaiser WA, Reichenbach JR. Resolving arterial phase and temporal enhancement characteristics in DCE MRM at high spatial resolution with TWIST acquisition. J Magn Reson imaging: JMRI. 2011;34(4):973–82.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mann RM, Mus RD, van Zelst J, Geppert C, Karssemeijer N, Platel B. A novel approach to contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging for screening: high-resolution ultrafast dynamic imaging. Invest Radiol. 2014;49(9):579–85.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sun K, Zhu H, Chai W, Zhan Y, Nickel D, Grimm R, Fu C, Yan F. Whole-lesion histogram and texture analyses of breast lesions on inline quantitative DCE mapping with CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(1):57–65.

Article  Google Scholar 

Li Z, Ai T, Hu Y, Yan X, Nickel MD, Xu X, Xia L. Application of whole-lesion histogram analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of breast lesions with the CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE technique. J Magn Reson imaging: JMRI. 2018;47(1):91–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tudorica LA, Oh KY, Roy N, Kettler MD, Chen Y, Hemmingson SL, Afzal A, Grinstead JW, Laub G, Li X, et al. A feasible high spatiotemporal resolution breast DCE-MRI protocol for clinical settings. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1257–67.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hao W, Peng W, Wang C, Zhao B, Wang G. Image quality of the CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE technique for ultra-fast breast DCE-MRI: Comparison with the conventional GRE technique. Eur J Radiol. 2020;129:109108.

Article  Google Scholar 

Schoppmann SF, Bayer G, Aumayr K, Taucher S, Geleff S, Rudas M, Kubista E, Hausmaninger H, Samonigg H, Gnant M, et al. Prognostic value of lymphangiogenesis and lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):306–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Koo HR, Cho N, Song IC, Kim H, Chang JM, Yi A, Yun BL, Moon WK. Correlation of perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers. J Magn Reson imaging: JMRI. 2012;36(1):145–51.

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu Z, Feng B, Li C, Chen Y, Chen Q, Li X, Guan J, Chen X, Cui E, Li R, et al. Preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI-based radiomics. J Magn Reson imaging: JMRI. 2019;50(3):847–57.

Article  Google Scholar 

Durando M, Gennaro L, Cho GY, Giri DD, Gnanasigamani MM, Patil S, Sutton EJ, Deasy JO, Morris EA, Thakur SB. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(9):1651–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Xu X, Zhang HL, Liu QP, Sun SW, Zhang J, Zhu FP, Yang G, Yan X, Zhang YD, Liu XS. Radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts microvascular invasion and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2019;70(6):1133–44.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ejlertsen B, Jensen MB, Rank F, Rasmussen BB, Christiansen P, Kroman N, Kvistgaard ME, Overgaard M, Toftdahl DB, Mouridsen HT. Population-based study of peritumoral lymphovascular invasion and outcome among patients with operable breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(10):729–35.

Article  Google Scholar 

Matsunuma R, Oguchi M, Fujikane T, Matsuura M, Sakai T, Kimura K, Morizono H, Iijima K, Izumori A, Miyagi Y, et al. Influence of lymphatic invasion on locoregional recurrence following mastectomy: indication for postmastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer patients with one to three positive nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(3):845–52.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rosen PP, Groshen S, Kinne DW. Prognosis in T2N0M0 stage I breast carcinoma: a 20-year follow-up study. J Clin oncology: official J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1991;9(9):1650–61.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Freedman GM, Li T, Polli LV, Anderson PR, Bleicher RJ, Sigurdson E, Swaby R, Dushkin H, Patchefsky A, Goldstein L. Lymphatic space invasion is not an independent predictor of outcomes in early stage breast cancer treated by breast-conserving surgery and radiation. Breast J. 2012;18(5):415–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fujii T, Yajima R, Hirakata T, Miyamoto T, Fujisawa T, Tsutsumi S, Ynagita Y, Iijima M, Kuwano H. Impact of the prognostic value of vascular invasion, but not lymphatic invasion, of the primary tumor in patients with breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(3):1255–9.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med. 1991;17(2):357–67.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Khalifa F, Soliman A, El-Baz A, Abou El-Ghar M, El-Diasty T, Gimel’farb G, Ouseph R, Dwyer AC. Models and methods for analyzing DCE-MRI: a review. Med Phys. 2014;41(12):124301.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fedorov A, Fluckiger J, Ayers GD, Li X, Gupta SN, Tempany C, Mulkern R, Yankeelov TE, Fennessy FM. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation. Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;32(4):321–9.

Article  Google Scholar