Shmakov, S. et al. Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 169–182 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Makarova, K. S. et al. Evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 67–83 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Özcan, A. et al. Programmable RNA targeting with the single-protein CRISPR effector Cas7-11. Nature 597, 720–725 (2021).
van Beljouw, S. P. et al. The gRAMP CRISPR–Cas effector is an RNA endonuclease complexed with a caspase-like peptidase. Science 373, 1349–1353 (2021).
Samai, P. et al. Co-transcriptional DNA and RNA cleavage during type III CRISPR–Cas immunity. Cell 161, 1164–1174 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Staals, R. H. et al. RNA targeting by the type III-A CRISPR–Cas Csm complex of Thermus thermophilus. Mol. Cell 56, 518–530 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tamulaitis, G. et al. Programmable RNA shredding by the type III-A CRISPR–Cas system of Streptococcus thermophilus. Mol. Cell 56, 506–517 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Osawa, T., Inanaga, H., Sato, C. & Numata, T. Crystal structure of the CRISPR–Cas RNA silencing Cmr complex bound to a target analog. Mol. Cell 58, 418–430 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guo, M. et al. Coupling of ssRNA cleavage with DNase activity in type III-A CRISPR–Csm revealed by cryo-EM and biochemistry. Cell Res. 29, 305–312 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
You, L. et al. Structure studies of the CRISPR–Csm complex reveal mechanism of co-transcriptional interference. Cell 176, 239–253. e216 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jia, N. et al. Type III-A CRISPR–Cas Csm complexes: assembly, periodic RNA cleavage, DNase activity regulation, and autoimmunity. Mol. Cell 73, 264–277. e265 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sofos, N. et al. Structures of the Cmr-β complex reveal the regulation of the immunity mechanism of type III-B CRISPR–Cas. Mol. Cell 79, 741–757. e747 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kazlauskiene, M., Tamulaitis, G., Kostiuk, G., Venclovas, Č. & Siksnys, V. Spatiotemporal control of type III-A CRISPR–Cas immunity: coupling DNA degradation with the target RNA recognition. Mol. Cell 62, 295–306 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Elmore, J. R. et al. Bipartite recognition of target RNAs activates DNA cleavage by the type III-B CRISPR–Cas system. Genes Dev. 30, 447–459 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Estrella, M. A., Kuo, F.-T. & Bailey, S. RNA-activated DNA cleavage by the type III-B CRISPR–Cas effector complex. Genes Dev. 30, 460–470 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Niewoehner, O. et al. Type III CRISPR–Cas systems produce cyclic oligoadenylate second messengers. Nature 548, 543–548 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kazlauskiene, M., Kostiuk, G., Venclovas, Č., Tamulaitis, G. & Siksnys, V. A cyclic oligonucleotide signaling pathway in type III CRISPR–Cas systems. Science 357, 605–609 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schmid, M. et al. Candidatus ‘Scalindua brodae’, sp. nov., Candidatus ‘Scalindua wagneri’, sp. nov., two new species of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 26, 529–538 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, H. Structural principles of CRISPR RNA processing. Structure 23, 13–20 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carte, J., Wang, R., Li, H., Terns, R. M. & Terns, M. P. Cas6 is an endoribonuclease that generates guide RNAs for invader defense in prokaryotes. Genes Dev. 22, 3489–3496 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kato, K. et al. Structure and engineering of the type III-E CRISPR–Cas7-11 effector complex. Cell 185, 2324–2337 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hennig, J. et al. Structural basis for the assembly of the Sxl–Unr translation regulatory complex. Nature 515, 287–290 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McLuskey, K. & Mottram, J. C. Comparative structural analysis of the caspase family with other clan CD cysteine peptidases. Biochem. J. 466, 219–232 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Johnson, A. G. et al. Bacterial gasdermins reveal an ancient mechanism of cell death. Science 375, 221–225 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, M. L. & Nuñez, J. K. CRISPR meets caspase. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 1481–1482 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rouillon, C., Athukoralage, J. S., Graham, S., Grüschow, S. & White, M. F. Control of cyclic oligoadenylate synthesis in a type III CRISPR system. eLife 7, e36734 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bepler, T. et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat. Methods 16, 1153–1160 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D 75, 861–877 (2019).
Afonine, P. V. et al. New tools for the analysis and validation of cryo-EM maps and atomic models. Acta Crystallogr. D 74, 814–840 (2018).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 874 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 74, 531–544 (2018).
留言 (0)