Available online 2 November 2022
ABSTRACTObjectivesTo evaluate whether there are differences in several performance metrics between male and female surgeons for hysterectomies.
DesignMulticenter retrospective cohort study. We matched surgeries performed by female surgeons to those by male surgeons using a propensity score and compared outcomes by gender after adjusting for years in practice and fellowship training.
Setting6 hospitals (3 academic, 3 community) in Ontario, Canada between July 2016 and December 2019
PatientsAll consecutive patients
InterventionsHysterectomy
Measurements and Main ResultsPrimary outcome was a composite of any complication or return to emergency room within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were Grade II or greater complications, return to emergency room, and operative time. We included 2664 hysterectomies performed by 77 surgeons. After propensity matching, 963 surgeries performed by females were compared to 963 performed by males. There were no differences in the primary (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71-1.20, p=.56) or secondary outcomes of Grade II or greater complication (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.71-1.45, p=.96) or return to emergency room (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.55-1.20, p=.30). Surgeries performed by males, however, were 24.72 minutes shorter (95% CI 18.09–31.34 minutes, p<.001). Entire cohort post-hoc regression analysis confirmed these findings. E-value analysis indicated that it is unlikely for an unmeasured confounder to undo the observed difference.
ConclusionWhile complication and readmission rates are similar, male surgeons may have a shorter operating time than female surgeons for hysterectomies, which may have implications for health systems and inequalities in surgeon renumeration.
Keywordscomplications
gender equity
quality improvement
surgical outcomes
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AAGL.
留言 (0)