Glazebrook M. Daniels T. Younger A. et al.

Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with end-stage ankle and hip arthrosis.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90: 499-505Cracchiolo 3rd, A. Deorio J.K.

Design features of current total ankle replacements: implants and instrumentation.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 16: 530-540

Total ankle arthroplasty: a historical perspective.

Foot Ankle Clin. 7: 695-702Sanders A.E. Kraszewski A.P. Ellis S.J. et al.

Differences in gait and stair ascent after total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis.

Foot Ankle Int. 42: 347-355Singer S. Klejman S. Pinsker E. et al.

Ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: gait analysis compared with normal controls.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 95 (): e191Thomas R. Daniels T.R. Parker K.

Gait analysis and functional outcomes following ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88: 526-535Coester L.M. Saltzman C.L. Leupold J. et al.

Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 83: 219-228Fuchs S. Sandmann C. Skwara A. et al.

Quality of life 20 years after arthrodesis of the ankle. A study of adjacent joints.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 85: 994-998Hendrickx R.P. Stufkens S.A. de Bruijn E.E. et al.

Medium- to long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis.

Foot Ankle Int. 32: 940-947Haddad S.L. Coetzee J.C. Estok R. et al.

Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89: 1899-1905Kim H.J. Suh D.H. Yang J.H. et al.

Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Int Orthop. 41: 101-109Stavrakis A.I. SooHoo N.F.

Trends in Complication Rates Following Ankle Arthrodesis and Total Ankle Replacement.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 98: 1453-1458Pugely A.J. Lu X. Amendola A. et al.

Trends in the use of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in the United States Medicare population.

Foot Ankle Int. 35: 207-215Vakhshori V. Sabour A.F. Alluri R.K. et al.

Patient and practice trends in total ankle replacement and tibiotalar arthrodesis in the united states from 2007 to 2013.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 27: e77-e84Hauer G. Hofer R. Kessler M. et al.

Revision rates after total ankle replacement: a comparison of clinical studies and arthroplasty registers.

Foot Ankle Int. 43: 176-185Lintz F. Mast J. Bernasconi A. et al.

3D, Weightbearing topographical study of periprosthetic cysts and alignment in total ankle replacement.

Foot Ankle Int. 41: 1-9Mehta N. Serino J. Hur E.S. et al.

Pathogenesis, evaluation, and management of osteolysis following total ankle arthroplasty.

Foot Ankle Int. 42: 230-242

Osteolytic cysts with total ankle replacement: frequency and causes?.

Foot Ankle Surg. 21: 75-76Espinosa N. Klammer G. Wirth S.H.

Osteolysis in total ankle replacement: how does it work?.

Foot Ankle Clin. 22: 267-275Schipper O.N. Haddad S.L. Fullam S. et al.

Wear characteristics of conventional ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene versus highly cross-linked polyethylene in total ankle arthroplasty.

Foot Ankle Int. 39: 1335-1344Bischoff J.E. Fryman J.C. Parcell J. et al.

Influence of crosslinking on the wear performance of polyethylene within total ankle arthroplasty.

Foot Ankle Int. 36: 369-376Assal M. Kutaish H. Acker A. et al.

Three-year rates of reoperation and revision following mobile versus fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty: a cohort of 302 patients with 2 implants of similar design.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 103: 2080-2088Gaudot F. Colombier J.A. Bonnin M. et al.

A controlled, comparative study of a fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing ankle arthroplasty.

Foot Ankle Int. 35: 131-140Nunley J.A. Adams S.B. Easley M.E. et al.

Prospective randomized trial comparing mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total ankle replacement.

Foot Ankle Int. 40: 1239-1248Arcangelo J. Guerra-Pinto F. Pinto A. et al.

Peri-prosthetic bone cysts after total ankle replacement. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Foot Ankle Surg. 25: 96-105Schipper O.N. Haddad S.L. Pytel P. et al.

Histological analysis of early osteolysis in total ankle arthroplasty.

Foot Ankle Int. 38: 351-359Gross C.E. Huh J. Green C. et al.

Outcomes of bone grafting of bone cysts after total ankle arthroplasty.

Foot Ankle Int. 37: 157-164van Wijngaarden R. van der Plaat L. Nieuwe Weme R.A. et al.

Etiopathogenesis of osteolytic cysts associated with total ankle arthroplasty, a histological study.

Foot Ankle Surg. 21: 132-136Naude J.J. Saragas N.P. Ferrao P.N.F.

CT scan assessment and functional outcome of periprosthetic bone grafting after total ankle arthroplasty at medium-term follow-up.

Foot Ankle Int. 43: 609-619Singh G. Reichard T. Hameister R. et al.

Ballooning osteolysis in 71 failed total ankle arthroplasties.

Acta Orthop. 87: 401-405Sundfeldt M. Carlsson L.V. Johansson C.B. et al.

Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories.

Acta Orthop. 77: 177-197

Effects of implant orientation and implant material on tibia bone strain, implant-bone micromotion, contact pressure, and wear depth due to total ankle replacement.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 233: 318-331Espinosa N. Walti M. Favre P. et al.

Misalignment of total ankle components can induce high joint contact pressures.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 92: 1179-1187Fukuda T. Haddad S.L. Ren Y. et al.

Impact of talar component rotation on contact pressure after total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

Foot Ankle Int. 31: 404-411Escudero M.I. Le V. Bemenderfer T.B. et al.

Total ankle arthroplasty radiographic alignment comparison between patient-specific instrumentation and standard instrumentation.

Foot Ankle Int. 42: 851-858Heisler L. Vach W. Katz G. et al.

Patient-Specific Instrumentation vs standard referencing in total ankle arthroplasty: a comparison of the radiologic outcome.

Foot Ankle Int. ()Escudero M.I. Symes M. Bemenderfer T.B. et al.

Does patient-specific instrumentation have a higher rate of early osteolysis than standard referencing techniques in total ankle arthroplasty? A radiographic analysis.

Foot Ankle Spec. 13: 32-42Lee G.W. Seo H.Y. Jung D.M. et al.

Comparison of preoperative bone density in patients with and without periprosthetic osteolysis following total ankle arthroplasty.

Foot Ankle Int. 42: 575-581Cho N.H. Kim S. Kwon D.J. et al.

The prevalence of hallux valgus and its association with foot pain and function in a rural Korean community.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 91: 494-498Waizy H. Behrens B.A. Radtke K. et al.

Bone cyst formation after ankle arthroplasty may be caused by stress shielding. A numerical simulation of the strain adaptive bone remodelling.

Foot (Edinb). 33: 14-19Kormi S. Kohonen I. Koivu H. et al.

Low rate of peri-implant osteolysis in trabecular metal total ankle replacement on short- to midterm follow-up.

Foot Ankle Int. 42: 1431-1438Aspenberg P. van der Vis H.

Fluid pressure may cause periprosthetic osteolysis. Particles are not the only thing.

Acta Orthop Scand. 69: 1-4Bonnin M. Gaudot F. Laurent J.R. et al.

The Salto total ankle arthroplasty: survivorship and analysis of failures at 7 to 11 years.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469: 225-236Henry J.K. Rider C. Cody E. et al.

Evaluating and managing the painful total ankle replacement.

Foot Ankle Int. 42: 1347-1361Hsu A.R. Haddad S.L. Myerson M.S.

Evaluation and management of the painful total ankle arthroplasty.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 23: 272-282Besse J.L. Brito N. Lienhart C.

Clinical evaluation and radiographic assessment of bone lysis of the AES total ankle replacement.

Foot Ankle Int. 30: 964-975Viste A. Al Zahrani N. Brito N. et al.

Periprosthetic osteolysis after AES total ankle replacement: Conventional radiography versus CT-scan.

Foot Ankle Surg. 21: 164-170Kohonen I. Koivu H. Pudas T. et al.

Does computed tomography add information on radiographic analysis in detecting periprosthetic osteolysis after total ankle arthroplasty?.

Foot Ankle Int. 34: 180-188de Cesar Netto C. Fonseca L.F. Fritz B. et al.

Metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty implants.

Eur Radiol. 28: 2216-2227Serino J. Kunze K.N. Jacobsen S.K. et al.

Nuclear medicine for the orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon.

Foot Ankle Int. 41: 612-623Yoon H.S. Lee J. Choi W.J. et al.

Periprosthetic osteolysis after total ankle arthroplasty.

Foot Ankle Int. 35: 14-21Kohonen I. Koivu H. Tiusanen H. et al.

Are periprosthetic osteolytic lesions in ankle worth bone grafting?.

Foot Ankle Surg. 23: 128-133Yang H.Y. Wang S.H. Lee K.B.

The HINTEGRA total ankle arthroplasty: functional outcomes and implant survivorship in 210 osteoarthritic ankles at a mean of 6.4 years.

Bone Joint J. 101-B: 695-701Besse J.L. Lienhart C. Fessy M.H.

Outcomes following cyst curettage and bone grafting for the management of periprosthetic cystic evolution after AES total ankle replacement.

Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 30: 157-170Lundeen G.A. Barousse P.S. Moles L.H. et al.

Technique tip: endoscopic-assisted curettage and bone grafting of periprosthetic total ankle arthroplasty bone cysts.

Foot Ankle Int. 42: 224-229

Primary and revision total ankle replacement using custom-designed prostheses.

Foot Ankle Clin. 13 (): 521-538

Revision total ankle replacement.

Foot Ankle Clin. 17: 687-706Devries J.G. Berlet G.C. Lee T.H. et al.

Revision total ankle replacement: an early look at agility to INBONE.

Foot Ankle Spec. 4: 235-244

Periprosthetic aseptic osteolysis in total ankle replacement: cause and management.

Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 30: 145-155Horisberger M. Henninger H.B. Valderrabano V. et al.

Bone augmentation for revision total ankle arthroplasty with large bone defects.

Acta Orthop. 86: 412-414

Management of Talar component subsidence.

Foot Ankle Clin. 22: 361-389Glazebrook M.A. Arsenault K. Dunbar M.

Evidence-based classification of complications in total ankle arthroplasty.

Foot Ankle Int. 30: 945-949Ketz J. Myerson M. Sanders R.

The salvage of complex hindfoot problems with use of a custom talar total ankle prosthesis.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 94: 1194-1200Bejarano-Pineda L. DeOrio J.K. Parekh S.G.

Combined total talus replacement and total ankle arthroplasty.

J Surg Orthop Adv. 29: 244-248Kurokawa H. Taniguchi A. Morita S. et al.

Total ankle arthroplasty incorporating a total talar prosthesis: a comparative study against the standard total ankle arthroplasty.

Bone Joint J. 101-B: 443-446Kanzaki N. Chinzei N. Yamamoto T. et al.

Clinical outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty with total talar prosthesis.

Foot Ankle Int. 40: 948-954Behrens S.B. Irwin T.A. Bemenderfer T.B. et al.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision total ankle arthroplasty using an intramedullary-referencing implant.

Foot Ankle Int. 41: 1510-1518Lachman J.R. Ramos J.A. Adams S.B. et al.

Revision surgery for metal component failure in total ankle arthroplasty.

Foot Ankle Orthop. 4 ()Hintermann B. Zwicky L. Knupp M. et al.

HINTEGRA revision arthroplasty for failed total ankle prostheses.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 95: 1166-1174Egglestone A. Kakwani R. Aradhyula M. et al.

Outcomes of revision surgery for failed total ankle replacement: revision arthroplasty versus arthrodesis.

Int Orthop. 44: 2727-2734Lachman J.R. Ramos J.A. Adams S.B. et al.

Patient-reported outcomes before and after primary and revision total ankle arthroplasty.

Foot Ankle Int. 40: 34-41Hordyk P.J. Fuerbringer B.A. Roukis T.S.

Sagittal ankle and midfoot range of motion before and after revision total ankle replacement: a retrospective comparative analysis.

J Foot Ankle Surg. 57: 521-526Kotnis R. Pasapula C. Anwar F. et al.

The management of failed ankle replacement.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 88: 1039-1047Rahm S. Klammer G. Benninger E. et al.

Inferior results of salvage arthrodesis after failed ankle replacement compared to primary arthrodesis.

Foot Ankle Int. 36: 349-359Deleu P.A. Devos Bevernage B. Maldague P. et al.

Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement.

Foot Ankle Int. 35: 549-557Kamrad I. Henricson A. Magnusson H. et al.

Outcome after salvage arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement.

Foot Ankle Int. 37: 255-261Culpan P. Le Strat V. Piriou P. et al.

Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89: 1178-1183Berkowitz M.J. Clare M.P. Walling A.K. et al.

Salvage of failed total ankle arthroplasty with fusion using structural allograft and internal fixation.

Foot Ankle Int. 32: S493-S502Hopgood P. Kumar R. Wood P.L.

Ankle arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 88: 1032-1038Kitaoka H.B. Romness D.W.

Arthrodesis for failed ankle arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty. 7: 277-284Carlsson A.S. Montgomery F. Besjakov J.

Arthrodesis of the ankle secondary to replacement.

Foot Ankle Int. 19: 240-245Ali A.A. Forrester R.A. O'Connor P. et al.

Revision of failed total ankle arthroplasty to a hindfoot fusion: 23 consecutive cases using the Phoenix nail.

Bone Joint J. 100-B: 475-479Gross C. Erickson B.J. Adams S.B. et al.

Ankle arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement: a systematic review of the literature.

Foot Ankle Spec. 8: 143-151

Salvage Arthrodesis for Failed Total Ankle Replacement.

Foot Ankle Clin. 25: 281-291Coetzee J.C. Den Hartog B.D. Stone McGaver R. et al.

Femoral Head Allografts for Talar Body Defects.

Foot Ankle Int. 42: 815-823Bullens P. de Waal Malefijt M. Louwerens J.W.

Conversion of failed ankle arthroplasty to an arthrodesis. Technique using an arthrodesis nail and a cage filled with morsellized bone graft.

Foot Ankle Surg. 16: 101-104Steele J.R. Kadakia R.J. Cunningham D.J. et al.

Comparison of 3D printed spherical implants versus femoral head allografts for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis.

J Foot Ankle Surg. 59: 1167-1170

Unsuccessful use of a titanium mesh cage in ankle arthrodesis: a report on three cases operated on due to a failed ankle replacement.

J Foot Ankle Surg. 47: 337-342Aubret S. Merlini L. Fessy M. et al.

Poor outcomes of fusion with Trabecular Metal implants after failed total ankle replacement: early results in 11 patients.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 104: 231-237