Rivas A.G. Epelman M. Ellsworth P.I. et al.

Magnetic resonance imaging of Müllerian anomalies in girls: concepts and controversies.

Pediatr Radiol. 2022; 52: 200-216Marcal L. Nothaft M.A. Coelho F. et al.

Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging.

Abdom Imaging. 2011; 36: 756-764

Magnetic resonance imaging of developmental anomalies of the uterus and the vagina in pediatric patients.

Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2015; 36: 332-347Epelman M. Dinan D. Gee M.S. et al.

Müllerian duct and related anomalies in children and adolescents.

Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013; 21: 773-789Merritt B.A. Behr S.C. Khati N.J.

Imaging of infertility, Part 2.

Radiol Clin North Am. 2020; 58: 227-238Robbins J.B. Broadwell C. Chow L.C. et al.

Müllerian duct anomalies: embryological development, classification, and MRI assessment.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 41: 1-12Dietrich J.E. Millar D.M. Quint E.H.

Non-Obstructive müllerian anomalies.

J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014; 27: 386-395

The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system.

Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17: 693-705

Congenital malformations of the genital tract and their management.

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003; 17: 19-40Wu V. Mar W. Milad M.P. et al.

magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of female infertility.

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2022; 51: 181-188Robbins J.B. Parry J.P. Guite K.M. et al.

MRI of pregnancy-related issues: M??llerian duct anomalies.

Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198: 302-310

Programme de Recherches sur les Aplasies Müllériennes (PRAM), Guerrier D. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome.

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007; 2: 13Merritt B.A. Behr S.C. Khati N.J.

Imaging of Infertility, Part 1.

Radiol Clin North Am. 2020; 58: 215-225Yoo R.E. Cho J.Y. Kim S.Y. et al.

A systematic approach to the magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnosis of congenital Müllerian duct anomalies and their mimics.

Abdom Imaging. 2015; 40: 192-206Coleman A.D. Arbuckle J.L.

Advanced imaging for the diagnosis and treatment of coexistent renal and müllerian abnormalities.

Curr Urol Rep. 2018; 19: 89

Primary amenorrhea: diagnosis and management.

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014; 69: 603-612Servaes S. Victoria T. Lovrenski J. et al.

Contemporary pediatric gynecologic imaging.

Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2010; 31: 116-140

A systematic approach to imaging the pelvis in amenorrhea.

Abdom Radiol. 2021; 46: 3326-3341Church D.G. Vancil J.M. Vasanawala S.S.

Magnetic resonance imaging for uterine and vaginal anomalies.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 21: 379-389Santos X.M. Krishnamurthy R. Bercaw-Pratt J.L. et al.

The utility of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging versus surgery for the characterization of müllerian anomalies in the pediatric and adolescent population.

J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012; 25: 181-184Grant L.A. Sala E. Griffin N.

Congenital and acquired conditions of the vulva and vagina on magnetic resonance imaging: a pictorial review.

Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2010; 31: 347-362Olpin J.D. Moeni A. Willmore R.J. et al.

MR imaging of müllerian fusion anomalies.

Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2017; 25: 563-575Dykes T.M. Siegel C. Dodson W.

Imaging of congenital uterine anomalies: review and self-assessment module.

Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189: S1-S10Behr S.C. Courtier J.L. Qayyum A.

Imaging of müllerian duct anomalies.

RadioGraphics. 2012; 32: E233-E250Junqueira B.L.P. Allen L.M. Spitzer R.F. et al.

müllerian duct anomalies and mimics in children and adolescents: correlative intraoperative assessment with clinical imaging.

RadioGraphics. 2009; 29: 1085-1103Jaramillo D. Lebowitz R.L. Hendren W.H.

The cloacal malformation: radiologic findings and imaging recommendations.

Radiology. 1990; 177: 441-448Blask A.R. Sanders R.C. Gearhart J.P.

Obstructed uterovaginal anomalies: demonstration with sonography. Part I. Neonates and infants.

Radiology. 1991; 179: 79-83Bouet P.E. Godbout A. El Hachem H. et al.

Fertility and pregnancy in turner syndrome.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016; 38: 712-718

Turner’s syndrome.

N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1227-1238Pfeifer S.M. Attaran M. Goldstein J. et al.

ASRM müllerian anomalies classification 2021.

Fertil Steril. 2021; 116: 1238-1252Russo G. di Lascio A. Ferrario M. et al.

46,XY karyotype in a female phenotype fetus: a challenging diagnosis.

J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012; 25: e77-e79Lanciotti L. Cofini M. Leonardi A. et al.

different clinical presentations and management in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS).

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16: 1268Khan S. Mannel L. Koopman C.L. et al.

The use of MRI in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with androgen insensitivity syndrome.

J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014; 27: e17-e20Grimbizis G.F. Gordts S. Di Spiezio Sardo A. et al.

The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.

Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2013; 28: 2032-2044Grimbizis G.F. Di Spiezio Sardo A. Saravelos S.H. et al.

The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies.

Gynecol Surg. 2016; 13: 1-16Bhagavath B. Greiner E. Griffiths K.M. et al.

uterine malformations: an update of diagnosis, management, and outcomes.

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017; 72: 377-392

Mayer-rokitansky-kuster-hauser syndrome: diagnosis with MR Imaging.

Genitourin IMAGING. 2013; 269: 6Pitot M.A. Bookwalter C.A. Dudiak K.M.

Müllerian duct anomalies coincident with endometriosis: a review.

Abdom Radiol. 2020; 45: 1723-1740Gungor Ugurlucan F. Dural O. Yasa C. et al.

Diagnosis, management, and outcome of obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis (OHVIRA syndrome): Is there a correlation between MRI findings and outcome?.

Clin Imaging. 2020; 59: 172-178