How to identify subgroups in longitudinal clinical data: Treatment response patterns in patients with a shortened dental arch.

Background

When dental patients seek care, treatments are not always successful, i.e., patients' oral health problems are not always eliminated or substantially reduced. Identifying these patients (treatment non-responders) is essential for clinical decision-making. Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) is rarely used in dentistry, but a promising statistical technique to identify non-responders in particular and clinical distinct patient groups in general in longitudinal data sets.

Aim

Using group-based trajectory modeling, this study aimed to demonstrate how to identify oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) treatment response patterns by the example of patients with a shortened dental arch (SDA).

Methods

This paper is a secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial. In this trial SDA patients received partial removable dental prostheses replacing missing teeth up to the first molars (N=79) either or the dental arch ended with the second premolar that was present or replaced by a cantilever fixed dental prosthesis (N=71). Up to ten follow-up examinations (1-2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 96, 120, and 180 months post-treatment) continued for 15 years. The outcome OHRQoL was assessed with the 49-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). Exploratory GBTM was performed to identify treatment response patterns.

Results

Two response patterns could be identified - "responders" and "non-responders." Responders’ OHRQoL improved substantially and stayed primarily stable over the 15 years. Non-responders’ OHRQoL did not improve considerably over time or worsened. While the SDA treatments were not related to the two response patterns, higher levels of functional, pain-related, psychological impairment in particular, and severely impaired OHRQoL in general predicted a non-responding OHRQoL pattern after treatment. Supplementary, a three pattern approach has been evaluated.

Conclusions

Clustering patients according to certain longitudinal characteristics after treatment is generally important, but specifically identifying treatment in non-responders is central. With the increasing availability of OHRQoL data in clinical research and regular patient care, GBTM has become a powerful tool to investigate which dental treatment works for which patients.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif