Postoperative Complications from Breast and Axillary Surgery

Bernat J.L. Peterson L.M.

Patient-Centered Informed Consent in Surgical Practice.

Arch Surg. 141: 86-92Browne J.P. Jeevan R. Gulliver-Clarke C. et al.

The association between complications and quality of life after mastectomy and breast reconstruction for breast cancer.

Cancer. 123: 3460-3467Barton M.B. West C.N. Liu I.L.A. et al.

Complications following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy.

J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 35: 61-66Seth A.K. Hirsch E.M. Kim J.Y.S. et al.

Hematoma after mastectomy with immediate reconstruction: an analysis of risk factors in 883 patients.

Ann Plast Surg. 71: 20-23Handel N. Cordray T. Gutierrez J. et al.

A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 117: 757-767Almasarweh S. Sudah M. Joukainen S. et al.

The Feasibility of Ultrasound-guided Vacuum-assisted Evacuation of Large Breast Hematomas.

Radiol Oncol. 54: 311O’Hea B.J. Ho M.N. Petrek J.A.

External compression dressing versus standard dressing after axillary lymphadenectomy.

Am J Surg. 177: 450-453Bullocks J. Basu C.B. Hsu P. et al.

Prevention of Hematomas and Seromas.

Semin Plast Surg. 20: 233Srivastava V. Basu S. Shukla V.K.

Seroma Formation after Breast Cancer Surgery: What We Have Learned in the Last Two Decades.

J Breast Cancer. 15: 373Montalto E. Mangraviti S. Costa G. et al.

Seroma fluid subsequent to axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer derives from an accumulation of afferent lymph.

Immunol Lett. 131: 67-72Van Bemmel A.J.M. Van De Velde C.J.H. Schmitz R.F. et al.

Prevention of seroma formation after axillary dissection in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 37: 829-835Unger J. Rutkowski R. Kohlmann T. et al.

Potential risk factors influencing the formation of postoperative seroma after breast surgery - a prospective study.

Anticancer Res. 41: 859-867Shamley D.R. Barker K. Simonite V. et al.

Delayed versus immediate exercises following surgery for breast cancer: a systematic review.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 90: 263-271de Oliveira L.L. de Aguiar S.S. Bender P.F.M. et al.

Men have a higher incidence of seroma after breast cancer surgery.

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 18: 1423-1427He X.D. Guo Z.H. Tian J.H. et al.

Whether drainage should be used after surgery for breast cancer? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Med Oncol. 28: 22-30Shima H. Kutomi G. Sato K. et al.

An optimal timing for removing a drain after breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Surg Res. 267: 267-273Faisal M. Abu-Elela S.T. Mostafa W. et al.

Efficacy of axillary exclusion on seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy.

World J Surg Oncol. 14: 1-5De Blacam C. Ogunleye A.A. Momoh A.O. et al.

High body mass index and smoking predict morbidity in breast cancer surgery: a multivariate analysis of 26,988 patients from the national surgical quality improvement program database.

Ann Surg. 255: 551-555Pastoriza J. McNelis J. Parsikia A. et al.

Predictive factors for surgical site infections in patients undergoing surgery for breast carcinoma.

Am Surg. 87: 68-76McCullough M.C. Chu C.K. Duggal C.S. et al.

Antibiotic prophylaxis and resistance in surgical site infection after immediate tissue expander reconstruction of the breast.

Ann Plast Surg. 77: 501-505Chen C.M. Halvorson E.G. Disa J.J. et al.

Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 120: 1477-1482

Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 128: 1162-1169Chang D.W. Barnea Y. Robb G.L.

Effects of an autologous flap combined with an implant for breast reconstruction: an evaluation of 1000 consecutive reconstructions of previously irradiated breasts.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 122: 356-362Thiruchelvam P.T.R. Leff D.R. Godden A.R. et al.

Primary radiotherapy and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction for patients with breast cancer (PRADA): a multicentre, prospective, non-randomised, feasibility study.

Lancet Oncol. 23: 682-690Degnim A.C. Throckmorton A.D. Boostrom S.Y. et al.

Surgical site infection (SSI) after breast surgery: impact of 2010 CDC Reporting Guidelines.

Ann Surg Oncol. 19: 4099Viola G.M. Selber J.C. Crosby M. et al.

Salvaging the infected breast tissue expander: a standardized multidisciplinary approach.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 4https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000676Gallagher M. Jones D.J. Bell-Syer S.V.

Prophylactic antibiotics to prevent surgical site infection after breast cancer surgery.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 9https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005360.PUB5Bold R.J. Mansfield P.F. Berger D.H. et al.

Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of prophylactic antibiotics in axillary lymph node dissection.

Am J Surg. 176: 239-243

American Society of Breast Surgeons T. Consensus Guideline on Preoperative Antibiotics and Surgical Site Infection in Breast Surgery. Available from: https://www.breastsurgeons.org/docs/statements/Consensus-Guideline-on-Preoperative-Antibiotics-and-Surgical-Site-Infection-in-Breast-Surgery.pdf.

Giguère G.B. Poirier B. Provencher L. et al.

Do preoperative prophylactic antibiotics reduce surgical site infection following wire-localized lumpectomy? A single-blind randomized clinical trial.

Ann Surg Oncol. 29: 2202-2208Petersen L. Carlson K. Kopkash K. et al.

Preoperative antibiotics do not reduce postoperative infections following needle-localized lumpectomy.

Breast J. 23: 49-51Kong A. Tartter P.I. Zappetti D.

The Significance of Risk Factors for Infection in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy and Axillary Dissection.

Breast J. 3: 81-84Alderman A. Gutowski K. Ahuja A. et al.

ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on breast reconstruction with expanders and implants.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 134: 648e-655eBağhaki S. Soybir G.R. Soran A.

Guideline for antimicrobial prophylaxis in breast surgery.

J Breast Heal. 10: 79Robertson S.A. Jeevaratnam J.A. Agrawal A. et al.

Mastectomy skin flap necrosis: challenges and solutions.

Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S81712Matsen C.B. Mehrara B. Eaton A. et al.

Skin flap necrosis after mastectomy with reconstruction: a prospective study.

Ann Surg Oncol. 23: 257-264Yabe S. Nakagawa T. Oda G. et al.

Association between skin flap necrosis and sarcopenia in patients who underwent total mastectomy.

Asian J Surg. 44: 465-470Chun Y.S. Verma K. Rosen H. et al.

Use of tumescent mastectomy technique as a risk factor for native breast skin flap necrosis following immediate breast reconstruction.

Am J Surg. 201: 160-165Galimberti V. Vicini E. Corso G. et al.

Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: Review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications.

The Breast. 34: S82-S84Robertson S.A. Rusby J.E. Cutress R.I.

Determinants of optimal mastectomy skin flap thickness.

Br J Surg. 101: 899-911Wiberg R. Andersson M.N. Svensson J. et al.

Prophylactic mastectomy: postoperative skin flap thickness evaluated by MRT, ultrasound and clinical examination.

Ann Surg Oncol. 27: 2221-2228Ogawa A. Nakagawa T. Oda G. et al.

Study of the protocol used to evaluate skin-flap perfusion in mastectomy based on the characteristics of indocyanine green.

Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 35 (): 102401Pruimboom T. Lindelauf A.A.M.A. Felli E. et al.

Perioperative hyperspectral imaging to assess mastectomy skin flap and DIEP flap perfusion in immediate autologous breast reconstruction: a pilot study.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 12https://doi.org/10.3390/DIAGNOSTICS12010184Gdalevitch P. Van Laeken N. Bahng S. et al.

Effects of nitroglycerin ointment on mastectomy flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 135: 1530-1539Spruijt N.E. Hoekstra L.T. Wilmink J. et al.

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment for mastectomy flap ischaemia: a case series of 50 breasts.

Diving Hyperb Med. 51: 2Nicholson B.T. Harvey J.A. Cohen M.A.

Nipple-areolar complex: normal anatomy and benign and malignant processes.

Radiographics. 29: 509-523Mallon P. Feron J.G. Couturaud B. et al.

The role of nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 131: 969-984Ahn S.J. Woo T.Y. Lee D.W. et al.

Nipple-areolar complex ischemia and necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 44: 1170-1176Zheng Y. Zhong M. Ni C. et al.

Radiotherapy and nipple–areolar complex necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Radiol Med. 122: 171-178Chicco M. Huang T.C.T. Cheng H.T.

Negative-pressure wound therapy in the prevention and management of complications from prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ann Plast Surg. 87: 478-483De Martino R.R. Goodney P.P. Spangler E.L. et al.

Variation in thromboembolic complications among patients undergoing commonly performed cancer operations.

J Vasc Surg. 55: 1035-1040.e4Tafur A. Fuentes H. Caprini J. et al.

Predictors of early mortality in cancer-associated thrombosis: analysis of the RIETE database.

TH Open Companion J Thromb Haemost. 2: e158-e166Castaldi M. George G. Stoller C. et al.

Independent predictors of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing reconstructive breast cancer surgery.

Plast Surg (Oakville, Ont). 29: 160-168Rochlin D.H. Sheckter C.C. Pannucci C. et al.

Venous thromboembolism following microsurgical breast reconstruction: a longitudinal analysis of 12,778 patients.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 146: 465-473Londero A.P. Bertozzi S. Cedolini C. et al.

Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism in female patients undergoing breast surgery.

Cancers (Basel). 14https://doi.org/10.3390/CANCERS14040988/S1Konoeda H. Yamaki T. Hamahata A. et al.

Incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing breast reconstruction with autologous tissue transfer.

Phlebology. 32: 282-288Lovely J.K. Nehring S.A. Boughey J.C. et al.

Balancing venous thromboembolism and hematoma after breast surgery.

Ann Surg Oncol. 19: 3230-3235Nwaogu I. Yan Y. Margenthaler J.A. et al.

Venous thromboembolism after breast reconstruction in patients undergoing breast surgery: an american college of surgeons NSQIP analysis.

J Am Coll Surg. 220: 886-893

American Society of Breast Surgeons T. Consensus Guideline on Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis for Patients Undergoing Breast Operations. Available from: https://www.breastsurgeons.org/docs/statements/Consensus-Guideline-on-Venous-Thromboembolism-VTE-Prophylaxis-for-Patients-Undergoing-Breast-Operations.pdf.

Pannucci C.J. Swistun L. MacDonald J.K. et al.

Individualized venous thromboembolism risk stratification using the 2005 caprini score to identify the benefits and harms of chemoprophylaxis in surgical patients: a meta-analysis.

Ann Surg. 265: 1094-1103Keith J.N. Chong T.W. Davar D. et al.

The timing of preoperative prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin administration in breast reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 132: 279-284Stevens S.M. Woller S.C. Baumann Kreuziger L. et al.

Executive summary: antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: second update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report.

Chest. 160: 2247-2259Kearon C. Akl E.A. Ornelas J. et al.

Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report.

Chest. 149: 315-352Douketis J.D. Spyropoulos A.C. Spencer F.A. et al.

Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: american college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Chest. 141: e326S-e350SKlifto K.M. Gurno C.F. Major M. et al.

Pre-, intra-, and/or postoperative arterial and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for breast surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 73: 1-18Lucci A. McCall L.M. Beitsch P.D. et al.

Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group trial Z0011.

J Clin Oncol. 25: 3657-3663Kozak D. Głowacka-Mrotek I. Nowikiewicz T. et al.

Analysis of undesirable sequelae of sentinel node surgery in breast cancer patients – a prospective cohort study.

Pathol Oncol Res. 24: 891Meininger A.K. Figuerres B.F. Goldberg B.A.

Scapular winging: an update.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 19: 453-462Flávia De Oliveira J. Bezerra T. Carolina A. et al.

Incidence and risk factors of winged scapula after axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer surgery.

Appl Cancer Res. 29: 69-73Adriaenssens N. De Ridder M. Lievens P. et al.

Scapula alata in early breast cancer patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of post-surgery short-course image-guided radiotherapy.

World J Surg Oncol. 10https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-86Macchi V. Tiengo C. Porzionato A. et al.

Medial and lateral pectoral nerves: course and branches.

Clin Anat. 20: 157-162

Anatomical study of pectoral nerves and its implications in surgery.

J Clin Diagn Res. 8https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/8631.4545Sharp E. Roberts M. Żurada-Zielińska A. et al.

The most commonly injured nerves at surgery: a comprehensive review.

Clin Anat. 34: 244-262Zhu J.J. Liu X.F. Zhang P.L. et al.

Anatomical information for intercostobrachial nerve preservation in axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.

Genet Mol Res. 13: 9315-9323Henry B.M. Graves M.J. Pękala J.R. et al.

Origin, Branching, and Communications of the Intercostobrachial Nerve: a Meta-Analysis with Implications for Mastectomy and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer.

Cureus. 9https://doi.org/10.7759/CUREUS.1101Vadivelu N. Schreck M. Lopez J. et al.

Pain after mastectomy and breast reconstruction.

Am Surg. 74: 285-296Mansel R.E. Fallowfield L. Kissin M. et al.

Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 98: 599-609Andersen K.G. Aasvang E.K. Kroman N. et al.

Intercostobrachial nerve handling and pain after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 58: 1240-1248Gärtner R. Jensen M.B. Nielsen J. et al.

Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery.

JAMA. 302: 1985-1992Chappell A.G. Yuksel S. Sasson D.C. et al.

Post-mastectomy pain syndrome: an up-to-date review of treatment outcomes.

JPRAS Open. 30: 97-109Yang A. Nadav D. Legler A. et al.

An interventional pain algorithm for the treatment of postmastectomy pain syndrome: a single-center retrospective review.

Pain Med. 22: 677-686Tokgöz S. Karaca Umay E. Yilmaz K.B. et al.

Role of intraoperative nerve monitoring in postoperative muscle and nerve function of patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.

J Investig Surg. 34: 703-710Noland S.S. Krauss E.M. Felder J.M. et al.

Surgical and clinical decision making in isolated long thoracic nerve palsy.

Hand (N Y). 13: 689Warner M.A. Blitt C.D. Butterworth J.F. et al.

Practice advisory for the prevention of perioperative peripheral neuropathies: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Prevention of Perioperative Peripheral Neuropathies.

Anesthesiology. 92: 1168-1182Zhang J. Moore A.E. Stringer M.D. et al.

Iatrogenic upper limb nerve injuries: a systematic review.

ANZ J Surg. 81: 227-236Rudra S. Roy A. Brenneman R. et al.

Radiation-Induced Brachial Plexopathy in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Comprehensive Adjuvant Radiation Therapy.

Adv Radiat Oncol. 6https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADRO.2020.10.015Jack M.M. Smith B.W. Capek S. et al.

The spectrum of brachial plexopathy from perineural spread of breast cancer.

J Neurosurg. : 1-10https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.12.JNS211882

Lymphedema Management: Anatomy of the Lymphatic System and the Lymphosome Concept with Reference to Lymphedema.

Semin Plast Surg. 32: 5Campisi C.C. Molinari L. Campisi C.S. et al.

Surgical research, staging-guided technical procedures and long-term clinical outcomes for the treatment of peripheral lymphedema: the Genoa Protocol.

J Surg Surg Res. 6: 041-050Cortina C.S. Yen T.W.F. Bergom C. et al.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema rates after modern axillary treatments: How accurate are our estimates?.

Surgery. 171: 682-686Naoum G.E. Roberts S. Brunelle C.L. et al.

Quantifying the impact of axillary surgery and nodal irradiation on breast cancer-related lymphedema and local tumor control: Long-term results from a prospective screening trial.

J Clin Oncol. 38: 3430-3438DiSipio T. Rye S. Newman B. et al.

Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lancet Oncol. 14: 500-515McLaughlin S.A. Brunelle C.L. Taghian A.

Breast cancer–related lymphedema: risk factors, screening, management, and the impact of locoregional treatment.

J Clin Oncol. 38: 2341Galimberti V. Cole B.F. Zurrida S. et al.

Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

Lancet Oncol. 14: 297-305

ASO author reflections: the evolving multidisciplinary management of the axilla in mastectomy patients.

Ann Surg Oncol. : 1-2https://doi.org/10.1245/S10434-021-10585-YCortina C.S. Bergom C. Craft M.A. et al.

A national survey of breast surgeons and radiation oncologists on contemporary axillary management in mastectomy patients.

Ann Surg Oncol. 28: 5568-5579

Comment on “women could avoid axillary lymph node dissection by choosing breast-conserving therapy instead of mastectomy.

Ann Surg Oncol. 28: 772-773Morrow M. Jagsi R. Chandler M. et al.

Surgeon attitudes toward the omission of axillary dissection in early breast cancer.

JAMA Oncol. 4: 1511-1516Donker M. van Tienhoven G. Straver M.E. et al.

Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.

Lancet Oncol. 15: 1303-1310Giuliano A.E. Ballman K.V. McCall L. et al.

Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial.

JAMA. 318: 918-926McDuff S.G.R. Mina A.I. Brunelle C.L. et al.

Timing of lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer: when are patients most at risk?.

Int J Radiat Oncol. 103: 62-70Basta M.N. Wu L.C. Kanchwala S.K. et al.

Reliable prediction of postmastectomy lymphedema: the risk assessment tool evaluating lymphedema.

Am J Surg. 213: 1125-1133.e1Armer J.M. Ballman K.V. McCall L. et al.

Factors associated with lymphedema in women with node-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and axillary dissection.

JAMA Surg. 154: 800-809Husted Madsen A. Haugaard K. Soerensen J. et al.

Arm morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection: a study from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

Breast. 17: 138-147McLaughlin S.A. DeSnyder S.M. Klimberg S. et al.

Considerations for clinicians in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema, recommendations from an expert panel: part 2: preventive and therapeutic options.

Ann Surg Oncol. 24: 2827-2835Stout Gergich N.L. Pfalzer L.A. McGarvey C. et al.

Preoperative assessment enables the early diagnosis and successful treatment of lymphedema.

Cancer. 112: 2809-2819McNeely M.L. Magee D.J. Lees A.W. et al.

The addition of manual lymph drainage to compression therapy for breast cancer related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 86: 95-106Schmitz K.H. Ahmed R.L. Troxel A. et al.

Weight lifting in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema.

N Engl J Med. 361: 664-673Schaverien M.V. Asaad M. Selber J.C. et al.

Outcomes of vascularized lymph node transplantation for treatment of lymphedema.

J Am Coll Surg. 232: 982-994Tummel E. Ochoa D. Korourian S. et al.

Does axillary reverse mapping prevent lymphedema after lymphadenectomy?.

Ann Surg. 265: 987-992DeSnyder S.M. Yi M. Boccardo F. et al.

American society of breast surgeons’ practice patterns for patients at risk and affected by breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Ann Surg Oncol. 28: 5742-5751

Diagnosis and treatment of axillary web syndrome: an overview.

Chin J Plast Reconstr Surg. 2: 128-136Koehler L.A. Haddad T.C. Hunter D.W. et al.

Axillary web syndrome following breast cancer surgery: symptoms, complications, and management strategies.

Breast Cancer (London). 11: 13O’Toole J. Miller C.L. Specht M.C. et al.

Cording following treatment for breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 140: 105-111

Physiotherapy management of axillary web syndrome following breast cancer treatment: discussing the use of soft tissue techniques.

Physiotherapy. 95: 314-320Cohen-Hallaleh R.B. Smith H.G. Smith R.C. et al.

Radiation induced angiosarcoma of the breast: outcomes from a retrospective case series.

Clin Sarcoma Res. 7: 15Kleinerman R.A. Tucker M.A. Tarone R.E. et al.

Risk of new cancers after radiotherapy in long-term survivors of retinoblastoma: an extended follow-up.

J Clin Oncol. 23: 2272-2279Mito J.K. Mitra D. Barysauskas C.M. et al.

A Comparison of outcomes and prognostic features for radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast and other radiation-associated sarcomas.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 104: 425-435

Angiosarcoma of the breast occurring soon after lumpectomy and breast irradiation for infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a case report.

Am J Clin Oncol. 26: 471-472

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif