Reducing the risk of nipple necrosis: technical observations in 340 nipple-sparing mastectomies.

Breast J. 19: 173-179McCarthy C.M. Mehrara B.J. Riedel E. al at

Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 121: 1886-1892Nava M.B. Cortinovis U. Ottolenghi J. et al.

Skin-reducing mastectomy.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 118: 603-610Howard M.A. Sisco M. Yao K. et al.

Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: a prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.

J Surg Oncol. 114: 416-422Salibian A.H. Harness J.K. Mowlds D.S.

Primary buttonhole mastopexy and nipple-sparing mastectomy: a preliminary report.

Ann Plast Surg. 77: 388-395Aliotta R.E. Scomacao I. Duraes E.F.R. et al.

Pushing the envelope: skin-only mastopexy in single-stage nipple-sparing mastectomy with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 147: 38-45Doren E.L. Kuykendall L.V.E. Lopez J.J. et al.

Free nipple grafting: an alternative for patients ineligible for nipple-sparing mastectomy?.

Ann Plast Surg. 72: S112-S115Kim E.K. Cho J.M. Lee J.W.

Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate nipple graft for large, ptotic breast.

J Breast Cancer. 22: 641-646Spear S.L. Rottman S.J. Seiboth L.A. et al.

Breast reconstruction using a staged nipple-sparing mastectomy following mastopexy or reduction.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 129: 572-581Momeni A. Kanchwala S. Sbitany H.

Oncoplastic procedures in preparation for nipple-sparing mastectomy and autologous breast reconstruction: controlling the breast envelope.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 145: 914-920Salibian A.A. Frey J.D. Karp N.S. et al.

Does staged breast reduction before nipple-sparing mastectomy decrease complications? A matched cohort study between staged and nonstaged techniques.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 144: 1023-1032Economides J.M. Graziano F. Tousimis E. et al.

Expanded algorithm and updated experience with breast reconstruction using a staged nipple-sparing mastectomy following mastopexy or reduction mammaplasty in the large or ptotic breast.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 143 (): 688ePeled A.W. Sbitany H. Foster R.D. et al.

Oncoplastic mammoplasty as a strategy for reducing reconstructive complications associated with postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Breast J. 20: 302-307Stein M.J. Karir A. Arnaout A. et al.

Quality-of-life and surgical outcomes for breast cancer patients treated with therapeutic reduction mammoplasty versus mastectomy with immediate reconstruction.

Ann Surg Oncol. 27: 4502-4512Clough K.B. Kaufman G.J. Nos C. et al.

Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery.

Ann Surg Oncol. 17: 1375-1391Chatterjee A. Gass J. Patel K. et al.

A consensus definition and classification system of oncoplastic surgery developed by the American Society of Breast Surgeons.

Ann Surg Oncol. 26: 3436-3444Patel K. Bloom J. Nardello S. et al.

An oncoplastic surgery primer: common indications, techniques, and complications in Level I and 2 volume displacement oncoplastic surgery.

Ann Surg Oncol. 26: 3063-3070Strong B. Hall-Findlay E.J.

How does volume of resection relate to symptom relief for reduction mammaplasty patients?.

Ann Plast Surg. 75: 376-382Acea-Nebril B. Cereijo-Garea C. Garcia-Novoa A. et al.

The role of oncoplastic breast reduction in the conservative management of breast cancer: complications, survival, and quality of life.

J Surg Oncol. 115: 679-686Denis-Katz H.S. Ghaedi B.B. Fitzpatrick A. et al.

Oncological safety, surgical outcome, and patient satisfaction of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with contralateral balancing reduction mammoplasty.

Plast Surg (Oakv). 29: 235-242Patel K. Hannah C.M. Gatti M.E. et al.

A head-to-head comparison of quality of life and aesthetic outcomes following immediate, staged-immediate, and delayed oncoplastic reduction mammaplasty.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 127: 2167-2175Di Micco R. O’Connell R.L. Barry P.A. et al.

Standard wide local excision or bilateral reduction mammoplasty in large-breasted women with small tumours: surgical and patient-reported outcomes.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 43: 636-641Prabhakar R. Rath G.K. Julka P.K. et al.

Breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning.

J Med Phys. 33: 43-48Fernando I.N. Ford H.T. Powles T.J. et al.

Factors affecting acute skin toxicity in patients having breast irradiation after conservative surgery: a prospective study of treatment practice at the Royal Marsden Hospital.

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 8: 226-233Losken A. Pinell-White X. Hart A.M. et al.

The oncoplastic reduction approach to breast conservation therapy: benefits for margin control.

Aesthet Surg J. 34: 1185-1191Piper M.L. Esserman L.J. Sbitany H. et al.

Outcomes following oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty: a systematic review.

Ann Plast Surg. 76: S222-S226Losken A. Pinell X.A. Eskenazi B.R.

The benefits of partial versus total breast reconstruction for women with macromastia.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 125: 1051-1056Tong W.M.Y. Baumann D.P. Villa M.T. et al.

Obese women experience fewer complications after oncoplastic breast repair following partial mastectomy than after immediate total breast reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 137: 777-791Morrow M. Strom E.A. Bassett L.W. et al.

Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma.

CA Cancer J Clin. 52: 277-300Masannat Y.A. Agrawal A. Maraqa L. et al.

Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer, is it time to think again?.

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 102: 62-66Tan M.P. Sitoh N.Y. Sim A.S.

Breast conservation treatment for multifocal and multicentric breast cancers in women with small-volume breast tissue.

ANZ J Surg. 87: E5-E10Kadioglu H. Yucel S. Yildiz S. et al.

Feasibility of breast conserving surgery in multifocal breast cancers.

Am J Surg. 208: 457-464Losken A. Hart A.M. Dutton J.W. et al.

The expanded use of autoaugmentation techniques in oncoplastic breast surgery.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 141: 10-19Bellizzi A. Vella Baldacchino R. Kazzazi F. et al.

The successful use of disparate pedicle types for bilateral therapeutic mammaplasties during breast conservation surgery.

J Surg Case Rep. 3: rjab064Silverstein M.J. Savalia N. Khan S. et al.

Extreme oncoplasty: breast conservation for patients who need mastectomy.

Breast J. 21: 52-59Silverstein M.J. Savalia N.B. Khan S. et al.

Oncoplastic split reduction with intraoperative radiation therapy.

Ann Surg Oncol. 22: 3405-3406Savioli F. Seth S. Morrow E. et al.

Extreme oncoplasty: breast conservation in patients with large, multifocal, and multicentric breast cancer.

Breast Cancer. 13 (): 353-359Koppiker C.B. Noor A.U. Dixit S. et al.

Extreme oncoplastic surgery for multifocal/multicentric and locally advanced breast cancer.

Int J Breast Cancer. : 4262589

Spora il mio nuova processo di amputazione della mammella.

Riforma Med. 22: 757

Inferior epigastric artery skin flap without rectus abdominis muscle.

Br J Plast Surg. 42: 645

The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap.

J Reconstr Microsurg. 30: 121-125Garvey P.B. Buchel E.W. Pockaj B.A. et al.

DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 117: 1711-1719Knox A.D.C. Ho A.L. Leung L. et al.

Comparison of outcomes following autologous breast reconstruction using the DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a 12-year clinical retrospective study and literature review.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 138: 16-28Haddock N.T. Cho M.J. Gassman A. et al.

Stacked profunda artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction in failed or unavailable deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 143 (): 488eGranzow J.W. Levine J.L. Chiu E.S. et al.

Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator flaps.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 59: 614-621Godbout E. Farmer L. Bortoluzzi P. et al.

Donor-site morbidity of the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction in teenagers.

Can J Plast Surg. 21: 19-22Mirzabeigi M. Au A. Jandali S. et al.

Trials and tribulations with the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap in autologous breast reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 128 (): 614eLargo R.D. Chu C.K. Chang E.I. et al.

Perforator mapping of the profunda artery perforator flap: anatomy and clinical experience.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 146: 1135-1145Qian B. Xiong L. Li J. et al.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on microsurgical safety and efficacy of profunda artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction.

J Oncol. 29: 9506720Allen Jr., R.J. Lee Z. Mayo J.L. et al.

The profunda artery perforator flap experience for breast reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 138: 968-975Atzeni M. Salzillo R. Haywood R. et al.

Breast reconstruction using the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap: technical refinements and evolution, outcomes, and patient satisfaction based on 116 consecutive flaps.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 75: 1617-1624Martinez C.A. Fairchild B. Secchi-Del Rio R. et al.

Bilateral outpatient breast reconstruction with stacked DIEP and vertical PAP flaps.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 9: e3878Haddock N.T. Suszynski T.M. Teotia S.S.

Consecutive bilateral breast reconstruction using stacked abdominally based and posterior thigh free flaps.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 147: 294-303DellaCroce F.J. Sullivan S.K. Trahan C.

Stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a review of 110 flaps in 55 cases over 3 years.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 127: 1093-1099Haddock N.T. Cho M.J. Teotia S.S.

Comparative analysis of single versus stacked free flap breast reconstruction: a single center experience.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 144 (): 369e

Hybrid breast reconstruction- the best of both worlds.

Gland Surg. 8: 82-89Scafati S.T. Cavaliere A. Aceto B. et al.

Combining autologous and prosthetic techniques: the breast reconstruction scale principle.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 5e1602

Hybrid prepectoral breast reconstruction: a surgical approach that combines the benefits of autologous and implant-based reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 142: 1109-1115Lee H.C. Lee J. Park S.H. et al.

The hybrid latissimus dorsi flap in immediate breast reconstruction: a comparative study with the abdominal-based flap.

Ann Plast Surg. 86: 394-399Bach A.D. Morgenstern I.H. Horch R.E.

Secondary “hybrid reconstruction” concept with silicone implants after autologous breast reconstruction: is it safe and reasonable?.

Med Sci Monit. 26: e921329Chirappapha P. Srichan P. Lertsithichai P. et al.

Nipple-areola complex sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 6: e1716Dossett L.A. Lowe J. Sun W. et al.

Prospective evaluation of skin and nipple-areola sensation and patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

J Surg Oncol. 114: 11-16Djohan R. Gage E. Gatherwright J. et al.

Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 125: 818-829

Breast cancer and sexual function.

Transl Androl Urol. 4: 160-168Faulkner H.R. Colwell A.S. Liao E.C. et al.

Thermal injury to reconstructed breasts from commonly used warming devices: a risk for reconstructive failure.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 4: e1033Seth R. Lamyman M.J. Athanassopoulos A. et al.

Too close for comfort: accidental burn following subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate implant reconstruction.

J R Soc Med. 101: 39-40Peled A.W. Amara D. Piper M.L. et al.

Development and validation of a nipple-specific scale for the BREAST-Q to assess patient-reported outcomes following nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 143: 1010-1017Slezak S. McGibbon B. Dellon A.L.

The sensational transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap: return of sensibility after TRAM breast reconstruction.

Ann Plast Surg. 28: 210-217Blondeel P.N. Demuynck M. Mete D. et al.

Sensory nerve repair in perforator flaps for autologous breast reconstruction: sensational or senseless?.

Br J Plast Surg. 52: 37-44Spiegel A.J. Menn Z.K. Eldor L. et al.

Breast reinnervation: DIEP neurotization using the third anterior intercostal nerve.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 1: e72Beugels J. Bijkerk E. Lataster A. et al.

Nerve coaptation improves the sensory recovery of the breast in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 148: 273-284 () ()Momeni A. Meyer S. Shefren K. et al.

Flap neurotization in breast reconstruction with nerve allografts: 1-year clinical outcomes.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 9: e3328Ducic I. Yoon J. Momeni A. et al.

Anatomical considerations to optimize sensory recovery in breast neurotization with allograft.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 6: e1985Gatherwright J. Knackstedt R. Djohan R.

Anatomic targets for breast reconstruction neurotization: past results and future possibilities.

Ann Plast Surg. 82: 207-212

Nerve preservation and allografting for sensory innervation following immediate implant breast reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 7: e2332

Peled AW, Peled ZM. Sensory reinnervation after mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction. Ann Breast Surg. Submitted for publication.

Djohan R. Scomacao I. Knackstedt R. et al.

Neurotization of the nipple-areola complex during implant-based reconstruction: evaluation of early sensation recovery.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 146: 250-254Tevlin R. Brazio P. Tran N. et al.

Immediate targeted nipple-areolar complex re-innervation: improving outcomes in immediate autologous breast reconstruction.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 74: 1503-1507Tsangaris E. Klassen A.F. Kaur M.N. et al.

Development and psychometric validation of the BREAST-Q sensation module for women undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.

Ann Surg Oncol. 28: 7842-7853Vartanian E.D. Lo A.Y. Hershenhouse K.S. et al.

The role of neurotization in autologous breast reconstruction: can reconstruction restore breast sensation?.

J Surg Oncol. 123: 1215-1231Weissler J.M. Koltz P.F. Carney M.J. et al.

Sifting through the evidence: a comprehensive review and analysis of neurotization in breast reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 141: 550-565