Smith R.A. Andrews K.S. Brooks D. et al.

Cancer screening in the United States, 2019: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.

CA Cancer J Clin. 69: 184-210Siegel R.L. Miller K.D. Fuchs H.E. et al.

Cancer statistics, 2022.

CA Cancer J Clin. 72: 7-33

Radiation Dose to Adults from Common Imaging Examinations.

()

Calculate Your Radiation Dose.

()Garayoa J. Hernandez-Giron I. Castillo M. et al.Fujita H. Hara T. Muramatsu C. Digital breast tomosynthesis: image quality and dose Saving of the Synthesized image. Breast imaging. IWDM 2014. Lecture notes in computer Science. 8539. Springer, Chamhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_22

ACR BI-RADS Follow-up and Outcome Monitoring.

in: D'Orsi C.J. Sickles E.A. Mendelson E.B. ACR BI-RADS atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA ()Lee C.S. Moy L. Friedewald S.M. et al.

Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 210: 241-245Smith R.A. Duffy S.W. Gabe R. et al.

The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned?.

Radiol Clin North Am. 42: 793-vTabár L. Yen A.M. Wu W.Y. et al.

Insights from the breast cancer screening trials: how screening affects the natural history of breast cancer and implications for evaluating service screening programs.

Breast J. 21: 13-20Oeffinger K.C. Fontham E.T. Etzioni R. et al.

Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society [published correction appears in JAMA.

JAMA. 314 (): 1599-1614Narayan A.K. Lee C.I. Lehman C.D.

Screening for Breast Cancer.

Med Clin North Am. 104: 1007-1021Broeders M. Moss S. Nyström L. et al.

The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies.

J Med Screen. 19: 14-25Coldman A. Phillips N. Wilson C. et al.

Pan-Canadian study of mammography screening and mortality from breast cancer [published correction appears in.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 107: dju404

Breast cancer mortality in relation to receipt of screening mammography: a case-control study in Saskatchewan, Canada.

Cancer Causes Control. 26: 231-237Yen A.M. Tsau H.S. Fann J.C. et al.

Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening With Risk-Based and Universal Mammography Screening Compared With Clinical Breast Examination: A Propensity Score Analysis of 1 429 890 Taiwanese Women.

JAMA Oncol. 2: 915-921Morrell S. Taylor R. Roder D. et al.

Mammography service screening and breast cancer mortality in New Zealand: a National Cohort Study 1999-2011.

Br J Cancer. 116: 828-839Moss S.M. Nyström L. Jonsson H. et al.

The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of trend studies.

J Med Screen. 19: 26-32

Mammography Screening Guideline Controversies: Opportunities to Improve Patient Engagement in Screening.

J Am Coll Radiol. 17: 633-636Badgwell B.D. Giordano S.H. Duan Z.Z. et al.

Mammography before diagnosis among women age 80 years and older with breast cancer.

J Clin Oncol. 26: 2482-2488Brawley O. Byers T. Chen A. et al.

New American Cancer Society process for creating trustworthy cancer screening guidelines.

JAMA. 306: 2495-2499Miglioretti D.L. Zhu W. Kerlikowske K. et al.

Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.

JAMA Oncol. 1: 1069-1077Harris R.P. Helfand M. Woolf S.H. et al.

Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process.

Am J Prev Med. 20: 21-35Nelson H.D. Pappas M. Cantor A. et al.

Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.

Ann Intern Med. 164 (): 256-267Puliti D. Duffy S.W. Miccinesi G. et al.

Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review.

J Med Screen. 19: 42-56

Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

() ()Hubbard R.A. Kerlikowske K. Flowers C.I. et al.

Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Ann Intern Med. 155 (): 481-492Tosteson A.N. Fryback D.G. Hammond C.S. et al.

Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.

JAMA Intern Med. 174: 954-961Lehman C.D. Arao R.F. Sprague B.L. et al.

National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Radiology. 283: 49-58Nelson H.D. O'Meara E.S. Kerlikowske K. et al.

Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.

Ann Intern Med. 164: 226-235

Benefits of screening mammography.

JAMA. 303: 168-169Burnside E.S. Park J.M. Fine J.P. et al.

The use of batch reading to improve the performance of screening mammography.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 185: 790-796Froicu M. Mani K.L. Coughlin B.

Satisfaction With Same-Day-Read Baseline Mammography.

J Am Coll Radiol. 16: 321-326Dontchos B.N. Narayan A.K. Seidler M. et al.

Impact of a Same-Day Breast Biopsy Program on Disparities in Time to Biopsy.

J Am Coll Radiol. 16: 1554-1560Lehman C.D. Yala A. Schuster T. et al.

Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.

Radiology. 290: 52-58

NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2021 Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.

NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2022 Breast Cancer Risk Reduction.

Claus E.B. Schildkraut J.M. Thompson W.D. et al.

The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

Cancer. 77: 2318-2324

The American Society of Breast Surgeons website. Position statement on screening mammography.

()Monticciolo D.L. Newell M.S. Moy L. et al.

Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR.

J Am Coll Radiol. 15: 408-414Saslow D. Boetes C. Burke W. et al.

American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.

CA Cancer J Clin. 57 (): 75-89McCormack V.A. dos Santos Silva I.

Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 15: 1159-1169Yaghjyan L. Colditz G.A. Rosner B. et al.

Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk: interactions of percent density, absolute dense, and non-dense areas with breast cancer risk factors.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 150: 181-189

DenseBreast-Info. Legislation and regulation.

() ()Ciatto S. Houssami N. Bernardi D. et al.

Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.

Lancet Oncol. 14: 583-589Weinstein S.P. Slanetz P.J. et al.Expert Panel on Breast Imaging

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Based on Breast Density.

J Am Coll Radiol. 18: S456-S473Svahn T.M. Houssami N. Sechopoulos I. et al.

Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.

Breast. 24: 93-99Skaane P. Bandos A.I. Gullien R. et al.

Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.

Radiology. 267: 47-56Friedewald S.M. Rafferty E.A. Rose S.L. et al.

Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.

JAMA. 311: 2499-2507Rafferty E.A. Durand M.A. Conant E.F. et al.

Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography in Dense and Nondense Breasts.

JAMA. 315: 1784-1786

Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: data and implications for population screening.

Expert Rev Med Devices. 12: 377-379Berg W.A. Blume J.D. Cormack J.B. et al.

Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

JAMA. 299 (): 2151-2163Ohuchi N. Suzuki A. Sobue T. et al.

Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial.

Lancet. 387: 341-348Weigert J. Steenbergen S.

The connecticut experiments second year: ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts.

Breast J. 21: 175-180Kuhl C.K. Schrading S. Leutner C.C. et al.

Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.

J Clin Oncol. 23: 8469-8476Sung J.S. Stamler S. Brooks J. et al.

Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results.

Radiology. 280: 716-722Bakker M.F. de Lange S.V. Pijnappel R.M. et al.

Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.

N Engl J Med. 381: 2091-2102Rhodes D.J. Hruska C.B. Phillips S.W. et al.

Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts.

Radiology. 258: 106-118Rhodes D.J. Hruska C.B. Conners A.L. et al.

Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 204: 241-251Shermis R.B. Wilson K.D. Doyle M.T. et al.

Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening With Molecular Breast Imaging for Women With Dense Breast Tissue.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 207: 450-457

Let's Get Real about Molecular Breast Imaging and Radiation Risk.

Radiol Imaging Cancer. 1 (): e190070Jochelson M.S. Lobbes M.B.I.

Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.

Radiology. 299: 36-48https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021201948Sung J.S. Lebron L. Keating D. et al.

Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.

Radiology. 293: 81-88Chen S.Q. Huang M. Shen Y.Y. et al.

Application of Abbreviated Protocol of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening in Dense Breast Tissue.

Acad Radiol. 24: 316-320Comstock C.E. Gatsonis C. Newstead G.M. et al.

Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.

JAMA. 323 (): 746-756

Breast cancer characteristics and outcomes among Hispanic Black and Hispanic White women.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 134: 1297-1304Stapleton S.M. Oseni T.O. Bababekov Y.J. et al.

Race/Ethnicity and Age Distribution of Breast Cancer Diagnosis in the United States.

JAMA Surg. 153: 594-595Monticciolo D.L. Malak S.F. Friedewald S.M. et al.

Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Inclusive of All Women at Average Risk: Update from the ACR and Society of Breast Imaging.

J Am Coll Radiol. 18: 1280-1288Perry H. Fang A.J. Tsai E.M. et al.

Imaging Health and Radiology Care of Transgender Patients: A Call to Build Evidence-Based Best Practices.

J Am Coll Radiol. 18: 475-480