You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
Full Text Access for Subscribers:You can read the full text of this article if you:
Select an optionLog InBuy ArticleSubscribeContent & PermissionsAccess through Ovid
Log In Access through OvidGYNECOLOGY: OPERATIVE GYNECOLOGY
Milman, Tal; Murji, Ally; Matelski, John; Shirreff, Lindsay
Author InformationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; and Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey:doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000001086
Metrics Abstract(Abstracted from Obstet Gynecol 2022;140:39–47)
Assessing surgical performance and tracking quality metrics has the potential to improve patient care and safety, reducing perioperative morbidity and mortality. A number of studies have suggested that surgeons inaccurately judge their own performance, especially with respect to self-reflection on surgical proficiency.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Related Articles Article Level MetricsThis website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. For information on cookies and how you can disable them visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
留言 (0)