Hepinstall M. Zucker H. Matzko C. et al.

Adoption of Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Results in Reliable Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at Minimum Two-Year Follow Up.

Surg Technol Online. 2021; https://doi.org/10.52198/21.sti.38.os1420View in Article Google ScholarHepinstall M.S. Naylor B. Salem H.S. et al.

Evolution of 3-Dimensional Functional Planning for Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Robotic Platform.

Surg Technol Int. 2020; 37: 395-403View in Article Google ScholarMarchand R.C. Collins S. Marchand K.B. et al.

Estimation of Femoral Version During Total Hip Arthroplasty: Surgeon Visual Assessment versus Robotic-Arm Assisted Technology.

Surg Technol Int. 2020; 37: 390-394View in Article Google ScholarHadley C.J. Grossman E.L. Mont M.A. et al.

Robotic-Assisted versus Manually Implanted Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiographic Comparison.

Surg Technol Int. 2020; 37: 371-376View in Article Google ScholarScholl L.Y. Hampp E.L. Alipit V. et al.

Effect of Manual versus Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty on Cervical Spine Static and Dynamic Postures.

J Knee Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721412View in Article Google ScholarVaracallo M. Chakravarty R. Denehy K. et al.

Joint perception and patient perceived satisfaction after total hip and knee arthroplasty in the American population.

J Orthop. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.018View in Article Google ScholarVaracallo M.A. Herzog L. Toossi N. et al.

Ten-Year Trends and Independent Risk Factors for Unplanned Readmission Following Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty at a Large Urban Academic Hospital.

J Arthroplasty. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.035View in Article Google ScholarDeGouveia W. Salem H.S. Sodhi N. et al.

An Economic Evaluation of Over 200,000 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties: Is the Current Model Sustainable?.

Surg Technol Int. 2020; 37: 367-370View in Article Google ScholarGuntaka S.M. Tarazi J.M. Chen Z. et al.

Higher Patient Complexities are Associated with Increased Length of Stay, Complications , and Readmissions After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Surg Technol Int. 2021; 38View in Article Google ScholarAbdelaal M.S. Restrepo C. Sharkey P.F.

Global Perspectives on Arthroplasty of Hip and Knee Joints.

Orthop Clin North Am. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2019.11.003View in Article Google ScholarSloan M. Premkumar A. Sheth N.P.

Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the u.s., 2014 to 2030.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100: 1455-1460View in Article Google ScholarChen Z. Tarazi J.M. Salem H.S. et al.

The Utility of Telehealth in the Recovery From the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Surg Technol Int. 2021; 39: 17-21View in Article Google ScholarDavis W.T. Sathiyakumar V. Jahangir A. et al.

Occupational injury among orthopaedic surgeons.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01427View in Article Google ScholarKnudsen M.L. Ludewig P.M. Braman J.P.

Musculoskeletal pain in resident orthopaedic surgeons: results of a novel survey.

Iowa Orthop J. 2014; 34: 190-196View in Article Google ScholarPeskun C. Walmsley D. Waddell J. et al.

Effect of surgeon fatigue on hip and knee arthroplasty.

Can J Surg. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.032910View in Article Google ScholarWhitney D.C. Ives S.J. Leonard G.R. et al.

Surgeon Energy Expenditure and Substrate Utilization during Simulated Spine Surgery.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019; https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00284View in Article Google ScholarArora M. Diwan A.D. Harris I.A.

Burnout in orthopaedic surgeons: A review.

ANZ J Surg. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12292View in Article Google ScholarNavalta J.W. Manning J.W. McCune D. et al.

Using Hexoskin Wearable Technology to Obtain Body Metrics in a Trail Hiking Setting.

Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000477034.13469.88View in Article Google ScholarSharkey P.F. Danoff J.R. Klein G. et al.

Surgeon Energy Expenditure During Total Joint Arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty. 2007; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.08.002View in Article Google ScholarFaber L.G. Maurits N.M. Lorist M.M.

Mental Fatigue Affects Visual Selective Attention.

PLoS One. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048073View in Article Google Scholarvan der Linden D. Frese M. Meijman T.F.

Mental fatigue and the control of cognitive processes: Effects on perseveration and planning.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00150-6View in Article Google ScholarXu R. Zhang C. He F. et al.

How Physical Activities Affect Mental Fatigue Based on EEG Energy, Connectivity, and Complexity.

Front Neurol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00915View in Article Google ScholarNawabi D.H. Conditt M.A. Ranawat A.S. et al.

Haptically guided robotic technology in total hip arthroplasty: A cadaveric investigation.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med. 2013; 227: 302-309View in Article Google ScholarHampp E.L. Chughtai M. Scholl L.Y. et al.

Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Greater Accuracy and Precision to Plan Compared with Manual Techniques.

J Knee Surg. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641729View in Article Google ScholarMont M.A. Cool C. Gregory D. et al.

Health care utilization and payer cost analysis of robotic arm assisted total knee arthroplasty at 30, 60, and 90 days.

J Knee Surg. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1695741View in Article Google ScholarWilson M.R. Poolton J.M. Malhotra N. et al.

Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: The surgery task load index (SURG-TLX).

World J Surg. 2011; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1141-4View in Article Google ScholarBarrack R.L. Lavernia C. Ries M. et al.

Virtual reality computer animation of the effect of component position and design on stability after total hip arthroplasty.

Orthop Clin North Am. 2001; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70227-3View in Article Google ScholarCharnley J. Cupic Z.

The nine and ten year results of the low friction arthroplasty of the hip.

Clin Orthop. 1973; https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197309000-00003View in Article Google ScholarD’Lima D.D. Urquhart A.G. Buehler K.O. et al.

The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200003000-00003View in Article Google ScholarScifert C.F. Brown T.D. Pedersen D.R. et al.

A finite element analysis of factors influencing total hip dislocation.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199810000-00016View in Article Google ScholarYamaguchi M. Akisue T. Bauer T.W. et al.

The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty. 2000; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(00)90601-6View in Article Google ScholarAlexander C. Loeb A.E. Fotouhi J. et al.

Augmented Reality for Acetabular Component Placement in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.025View in Article Google Scholar