Ghahramani F, Wang J. Impact of smartphones on quality of life: a health information behavior perspective. Inf Syst Front. 2020;22:1275–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09931-z.
Smith R, Bryant L, Hemsley B. Dysphagia and quality of life, participation, and inclusion experiences and outcomes for adults and children with dysphagia: a scoping review. Perspect ASHA Special Interest. 2022;7(1):181–96. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_PERSP-21-00162.
Kim H, Paige Powell M, Bhuyan SS. Seeking medical information using mobile apps and the internet: are family caregivers different from the general public? J Med Syst. 2017;41(3):38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0684-9.
Maon SN, Hassan NM, Seman SAA. Online health information seeking behavior pattern. Adv Sci Lett. 2017;23:10582–5. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.10107.
Finney Rutten LJ, Blake KD, Greenberg-Worisek AJ, et al. Online health information seeking among US adults: measuring progress toward a healthy people 2020 objective. Public Health Rep. 2019;134(6):617–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354919874074.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jia X, Pang Y, Liu LS. Online health information seeking behavior: a systematic review. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(12):1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121740.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tan SS, Goonawardene N. Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5729.
Alvarez A (2013) How are physicians using smartphones for professional purposes? Kantar Media Health Research Insights.
Mikalef P, Kourouthanassis PE, Pateli AG. Online information search behaviour of physicians. Health Info Libr J. 2017;34(1):58–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12170.
Nail-Chiwetalu B, Bernstein Ratner N. An assessment of the information-seeking abilities and needs of practicing speech-language pathologists. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;95(2):182–8. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.95.2.182.
Kloda LA, Bartlett JC. Clinical information behavior of rehabilitation therapists: a review of the research on occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(3):194–202. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.008.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. History of health literacy definitions. 2021. https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/health-literacy-healthy-people-2030/history-health-literacy-definitions. Accessed 22 Feb 2021
O’Connell Ferster AP, Hu A. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders. Ear Nose Throat J. 2017;96(3):128–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2017.08.003.
Finnie RK, Felder TM, Linder SK, Mullen PD. Beyond reading level: a systematic review of the suitability of cancer education print and web-based materials. J Cancer Educ. 2010;25(4):497–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-010-0075-0.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the patient education materials assessment tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(3):395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Atcherson S, DeLaune A, Hadden K, et al. A computer-based readability analysis of consumer materials on the American speech-language-hearing association website. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord. 2014;41:12–23.
Douglas A, Kelly-Campbell R. Readability of patient-reported outcome measures in adult audiologic rehabilitation. Am J Audiol. 2018;27(2):208–18. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJA-17-0095.
Gray S, Zraick R, Atcherson A. Readability of individuals with disabilities education act part b procedural safeguards: an update. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2019;50(8):373–84. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0057.
Manchaiah V, Dockens A, Flagge A, et al. Quality and readability of english-language internet information for tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol. 2019;30(1):31–40. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.17070.
Nicholson NC, Atcherson SR, Martin PF, et al. Readability, user-friendliness, and key content analysis of newborn hearing screening brochures. J Early Hear Det Interv. 2016;1(1):66–77. https://doi.org/10.15142/T36C7N.
Pace CC, Atcherson SR, Zraick RI. A computer-based readability analysis of patient-reported outcome questionnaires related to oral health quality of life. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89(1):76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.05.010.
Potter H. Readability, quality, and suitability of web-based consumer audiological health information for adults with a hearing impairment living in New Zealand. University of Canterbury Research Repository. 2015. https://doi.org/10.26021/8493
Slavych BK, Zraick RI, Ruleman A. A systematic review of voice-related patient-reported outcome measures for use with adults. J Voice. 2021;21:00340–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.09.032.
Stefu J, Slavych B, Zraick R. Patient-reported outcome measures in voice: an updated readability analysis. J Voice. 2021;21:00085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.01.028.
Zraick RI, Azios M, Handley MM, et al. Quality and readability of internet information about stuttering. J Fluen Disord. 2021;67:105824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105824.
Zraick R, Atcherson A. Readability of patient-reported outcome questionnaires for use for persons with dysphonia. J Voice. 2012;26(5):635–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.01.009.
Zraick R, Kempster G, Connor N, et al. Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;20(1):14–22. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0105.
Zraick R, Atcherson S, Ham B. Readability of patient-reported outcome quesitonnaires for use with persons with swallowing disorders. Dysphagia. 2012;27:346–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9373-x.
Kutner M, Greenberg E, Ying J et al. The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. 2006. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006483.pdf
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, program for the international assessment of adult competencies (PIAAC), U.S. PIAAC 2012/2014. Accessed 25 Apr 2021.
Wilson-Stronks A, Schyve P, Rodriguez I et al. Advancing effective communication, cultural competence, and patient-and family-centered care: a roadmap for hospitals. 2010. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/resources/patient-safety-topics/health-equity/aroadmapforhospitalsfinalversion727pdf.pdf?db=web&hash=AC3AC4BED1D973713C2CA6B2E5ACD01B&hash=AC3AC4BED1D973713C2CA6B2E5ACD01B
Beer AJ, Eggerstedt M, Urban MJ, et al. Quality-based evaluation of patient-facing online education materials regarding facial filler procedures. Facial Plast Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741400.
Doubleday AR, Novin S, Long KL, et al. Online information for treatment for low-risk thyroid cancer: assessment of timeliness, content, quality, and readability. J Canc Educ. 2021;36:850–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01713-5.
Edmunds M, Denniston A, Boelaert K, et al. Patient information in graves’ disease and thyroid-associated ophthalmology: readability assessment of online resources. Thyroid. 2014;24(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2013.0252.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Laplante-Levesque A, Brännström J, Andersson G, et al. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for adults with hearing impairment and their significant others. Int J Audiol. 2012. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2012.684406.
Rothrock SG, Rothrock AN, Swetland SB, et al. Quality, trustworthiness, readability, and accuracy of medical information regarding common pediatric emergency medicine-related complaints on the web. J Emerg Med. 2019;57(4):469–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.06.043.
Svider P, Agarwal N, Choudhry O, et al. Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34(1):31–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.08.001.
Azios J, Bellon-Harn M, Dockens A, et al. Quality and readability of English-language internet information on aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2017.1362034.
Dueppen A, Bellon-Harn M, Manchaiah V. Suitability of English language internet-based information for voice disorders. J Voice. 2020;34(6):962.e1-932.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.06.011.
Felipe L, Beukes E, Baylie F, et al. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for vestibular disorders. J Vestib Res. 2020;30(2):63–72. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-200698.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vandenbroucke J, Elm E, Altman D, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiol. 2007;18(6):805–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511.
Search engine market share worldwide. StatCounter GlobalStats. 2021. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share#monthly-202109-202110. Accessed 02 Oct 2021
Purcell K, Brenner J, Raine L. Main Findings. Pew Research Center. 2012. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2012/03/09/main-findings-11/. Accessed 02 Oct 2021
Search engine market share Australia. StatCounter GlobalStats. 2021. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/australia. Accessed 02 Oct 2021
Search engine market share Canada. StatCounter GlobalStats. 2021. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/canada. Accessed 02 Oct 2021
Search engine market share United Kingdom. StatCounter GlobalStats. 2021. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/united-kingdom. Accessed 02 Oct 2021
Search engine market share United States of America. StatCounter GlobalStats. 2021. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/united-states-of-america. Accessed 02 Oct 2021
Usability A/B test your ads in minutes, not days. Chitika. 2021. https://chitika.com/. Accessed 23 Apr 2021
Google organic CTR history. Advanced web ranking. 2021. https://www.advancedwebranking.com/ctrstudy/. Accessed 23 Apr 2021
Dean B (2019) We analyzed 5 million Google search results: Here's what we learned about organic CTR. Backlinko. 2021. https://backlinko.com/google-ctr-stats. Accessed 25 Apr 2021
Team HON. Search through HONcode certified sites and access reliable, transparent, and ethical health information. Health on the Net. 1995. https://www.hon.ch/en/search.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2021
Accreditations Directory URAC. 2021. https://www.urac.org/directory/accreditations/. Accessed 10 Dec 2021
Ademiluyi G, Charlotte RE, Charlotte ES. Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the internet. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50(2):151–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00124-6.
Charnock D, Shepperd S. Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting. Health Educ Res. 2004;19(4):440–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg046.
留言 (0)