Assessment of Online Patient Education Material About Dysphagia

Ghahramani F, Wang J. Impact of smartphones on quality of life: a health information behavior perspective. Inf Syst Front. 2020;22:1275–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09931-z.

Article  Google Scholar 

Smith R, Bryant L, Hemsley B. Dysphagia and quality of life, participation, and inclusion experiences and outcomes for adults and children with dysphagia: a scoping review. Perspect ASHA Special Interest. 2022;7(1):181–96. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_PERSP-21-00162.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim H, Paige Powell M, Bhuyan SS. Seeking medical information using mobile apps and the internet: are family caregivers different from the general public? J Med Syst. 2017;41(3):38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0684-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maon SN, Hassan NM, Seman SAA. Online health information seeking behavior pattern. Adv Sci Lett. 2017;23:10582–5. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.10107.

Article  Google Scholar 

Finney Rutten LJ, Blake KD, Greenberg-Worisek AJ, et al. Online health information seeking among US adults: measuring progress toward a healthy people 2020 objective. Public Health Rep. 2019;134(6):617–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354919874074.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jia X, Pang Y, Liu LS. Online health information seeking behavior: a systematic review. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(12):1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121740.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tan SS, Goonawardene N. Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5729.

Article  Google Scholar 

Alvarez A (2013) How are physicians using smartphones for professional purposes? Kantar Media Health Research Insights.

Mikalef P, Kourouthanassis PE, Pateli AG. Online information search behaviour of physicians. Health Info Libr J. 2017;34(1):58–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12170.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nail-Chiwetalu B, Bernstein Ratner N. An assessment of the information-seeking abilities and needs of practicing speech-language pathologists. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;95(2):182–8. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.95.2.182.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kloda LA, Bartlett JC. Clinical information behavior of rehabilitation therapists: a review of the research on occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(3):194–202. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.008.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. History of health literacy definitions. 2021. https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/health-literacy-healthy-people-2030/history-health-literacy-definitions. Accessed 22 Feb 2021

O’Connell Ferster AP, Hu A. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders. Ear Nose Throat J. 2017;96(3):128–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2017.08.003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Finnie RK, Felder TM, Linder SK, Mullen PD. Beyond reading level: a systematic review of the suitability of cancer education print and web-based materials. J Cancer Educ. 2010;25(4):497–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-010-0075-0.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the patient education materials assessment tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(3):395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Atcherson S, DeLaune A, Hadden K, et al. A computer-based readability analysis of consumer materials on the American speech-language-hearing association website. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord. 2014;41:12–23.

Article  Google Scholar 

Douglas A, Kelly-Campbell R. Readability of patient-reported outcome measures in adult audiologic rehabilitation. Am J Audiol. 2018;27(2):208–18. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJA-17-0095.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gray S, Zraick R, Atcherson A. Readability of individuals with disabilities education act part b procedural safeguards: an update. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2019;50(8):373–84. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0057.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Manchaiah V, Dockens A, Flagge A, et al. Quality and readability of english-language internet information for tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol. 2019;30(1):31–40. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.17070.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nicholson NC, Atcherson SR, Martin PF, et al. Readability, user-friendliness, and key content analysis of newborn hearing screening brochures. J Early Hear Det Interv. 2016;1(1):66–77. https://doi.org/10.15142/T36C7N.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pace CC, Atcherson SR, Zraick RI. A computer-based readability analysis of patient-reported outcome questionnaires related to oral health quality of life. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89(1):76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.05.010.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Potter H. Readability, quality, and suitability of web-based consumer audiological health information for adults with a hearing impairment living in New Zealand. University of Canterbury Research Repository. 2015. https://doi.org/10.26021/8493

Slavych BK, Zraick RI, Ruleman A. A systematic review of voice-related patient-reported outcome measures for use with adults. J Voice. 2021;21:00340–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.09.032.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stefu J, Slavych B, Zraick R. Patient-reported outcome measures in voice: an updated readability analysis. J Voice. 2021;21:00085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.01.028.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zraick RI, Azios M, Handley MM, et al. Quality and readability of internet information about stuttering. J Fluen Disord. 2021;67:105824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105824.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zraick R, Atcherson A. Readability of patient-reported outcome questionnaires for use for persons with dysphonia. J Voice. 2012;26(5):635–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.01.009.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zraick R, Kempster G, Connor N, et al. Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;20(1):14–22. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0105.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zraick R, Atcherson S, Ham B. Readability of patient-reported outcome quesitonnaires for use with persons with swallowing disorders. Dysphagia. 2012;27:346–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9373-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kutner M, Greenberg E, Ying J et al. The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. 2006. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006483.pdf

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, program for the international assessment of adult competencies (PIAAC), U.S. PIAAC 2012/2014. Accessed 25 Apr 2021.

Wilson-Stronks A, Schyve P, Rodriguez I et al. Advancing effective communication, cultural competence, and patient-and family-centered care: a roadmap for hospitals. 2010. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/resources/patient-safety-topics/health-equity/aroadmapforhospitalsfinalversion727pdf.pdf?db=web&hash=AC3AC4BED1D973713C2CA6B2E5ACD01B&hash=AC3AC4BED1D973713C2CA6B2E5ACD01B

Beer AJ, Eggerstedt M, Urban MJ, et al. Quality-based evaluation of patient-facing online education materials regarding facial filler procedures. Facial Plast Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741400.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Doubleday AR, Novin S, Long KL, et al. Online information for treatment for low-risk thyroid cancer: assessment of timeliness, content, quality, and readability. J Canc Educ. 2021;36:850–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01713-5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Edmunds M, Denniston A, Boelaert K, et al. Patient information in graves’ disease and thyroid-associated ophthalmology: readability assessment of online resources. Thyroid. 2014;24(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2013.0252.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Laplante-Levesque A, Brännström J, Andersson G, et al. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for adults with hearing impairment and their significant others. Int J Audiol. 2012. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2012.684406.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rothrock SG, Rothrock AN, Swetland SB, et al. Quality, trustworthiness, readability, and accuracy of medical information regarding common pediatric emergency medicine-related complaints on the web. J Emerg Med. 2019;57(4):469–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.06.043.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Svider P, Agarwal N, Choudhry O, et al. Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34(1):31–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.08.001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Azios J, Bellon-Harn M, Dockens A, et al. Quality and readability of English-language internet information on aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2017.1362034.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dueppen A, Bellon-Harn M, Manchaiah V. Suitability of English language internet-based information for voice disorders. J Voice. 2020;34(6):962.e1-932.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.06.011.

Article  Google Scholar 

Felipe L, Beukes E, Baylie F, et al. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for vestibular disorders. J Vestib Res. 2020;30(2):63–72. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-200698.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vandenbroucke J, Elm E, Altman D, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiol. 2007;18(6):805–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511.

Article  Google Scholar 

Search engine market share worldwide. StatCounter GlobalStats. 2021. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share#monthly-202109-202110. Accessed 02 Oct 2021

Purcell K, Brenner J, Raine L. Main Findings. Pew Research Center. 2012. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2012/03/09/main-findings-11/. Accessed 02 Oct 2021

Search engine market share Australia. StatCounter GlobalStats. 2021. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/australia. Accessed 02 Oct 2021

Search engine market share Canada. StatCounter GlobalStats. 2021. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/canada. Accessed 02 Oct 2021

Search engine market share United Kingdom. StatCounter GlobalStats. 2021. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/united-kingdom. Accessed 02 Oct 2021

Search engine market share United States of America. StatCounter GlobalStats. 2021. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/united-states-of-america. Accessed 02 Oct 2021

Usability A/B test your ads in minutes, not days. Chitika. 2021. https://chitika.com/. Accessed 23 Apr 2021

Google organic CTR history. Advanced web ranking. 2021. https://www.advancedwebranking.com/ctrstudy/. Accessed 23 Apr 2021

Dean B (2019) We analyzed 5 million Google search results: Here's what we learned about organic CTR. Backlinko. 2021. https://backlinko.com/google-ctr-stats. Accessed 25 Apr 2021

Team HON. Search through HONcode certified sites and access reliable, transparent, and ethical health information. Health on the Net. 1995. https://www.hon.ch/en/search.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2021

Accreditations Directory URAC. 2021. https://www.urac.org/directory/accreditations/. Accessed 10 Dec 2021

Ademiluyi G, Charlotte RE, Charlotte ES. Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the internet. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50(2):151–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00124-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Charnock D, Shepperd S. Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting. Health Educ Res. 2004;19(4):440–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg046.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif