The different faces of metastatic melanoma in the gastrointestinal tract

Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer. The major risk factors for cutaneous melanoma include exposure to ultraviolet rays, fair complexion and prior personal or family history of melanoma. Disease outcomes depend on the extent and stage of melanoma at presentation. Whilst there has been a steady increase in the incidence of melanoma over the past decades [1], the mortality rate has decreased for all stages of disease [2]. This is thought to be mostly due to earlier diagnosis, surgical intervention and active systemic therapies [3]. In particular, the 5-year survival rate of metastatic melanoma has increased from less than 5% in 2010 to now around 30% [4].

Melanoma invades locally and spreads via lymph nodes and the bloodstream to distant organs. Common sites of metastasis include the liver, lungs, skin and brain [5]. The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is a less common site for melanoma metastases to occur in [6]. Cutaneous melanoma is the most common tumour metastasising to the GIT [7, 8]; however, its diagnosis remains challenging due to its vague clinical presentation and diverse morphological appearance on imaging. Computed tomography (CT) is the standard modality for detection, staging and surveillance of patients with melanoma. Functional imaging, such as positron emission tomography (PET)-CT and whole body multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is utilised in specific circumstances [9]. Depending upon which guidelines are followed, PET-CT can be an alternative imaging test for staging and surveillance [9, 10]. As for whole body MRI, current guidelines only recommend its use in staging and surveillance of pregnant and young (< 24 years old) patients [9].

Despite GIT metastases suggesting overall poorer prognosis and survival [6], some patients achieve long-term remission following surgical resection (in example Fig. 1) [11]. Although much of the survival gains of patients treated for metastatic melanoma (MM) are nowadays attributable to modern systemic therapies, surgical clearance of oligometastatic disease (typically defined as up to 3 disease sites) remains a key intervention for alleviation of symptoms and improving survival, even in patients responding to systemic therapy [6, 12, 13]. Therefore, early diagnosis and rapid intervention for melanoma in the GIT are important to maximise both quantity and quality of life [14].

Fig. 1figure 1

Case report: oral and intravenous portal phase contrast-enhanced CT axial (a) and coronal (b) of a 33-year-old male patient diagnosed with left lower eyelid melanoma which subsequently metastasised to the lymph nodes, lungs, brain, SB and subcutaneous tissue in the following 5-year period. Complete response was achieved after chemotherapy, immunotherapy and radiotherapy. One year after treatment completion he relapsed, presenting with two jejunal metastases (arrows) and involvement of the draining mesenteric lymph nodes (arrow heads). Surgical resection was then performed with no evidence of disease recurrence to date, after 10 years of follow-up

Melanoma in the GIT can also rarely be a true primary tumour arising from the GI mucosa, with this entity being biologically distinct from cutaneous melanoma. In the GIT, they arise most frequently in the anorectal mucosal epithelium (anus 31% and rectum 22%), and less often in the oesophagus (6%), stomach (3%), small intestine (2%) and large intestine (1%) [15], with a high proportion arising in the mucosal linings of the oral-nasopharynx (35%).

Evaluation of staging CT studies in patients with melanoma can be difficult and time consuming given the extent and unpredictable pattern of disease. Nevertheless, the GIT is an important review area in these patients, particularly in the case of primary cutaneous melanoma arising from the head and neck region, trunk and lower extremity [16] as these are the primary melanoma sites that more commonly metastasise to the GIT. In this review, we aim to illustrate the various imaging features of melanoma metastases in the GIT with some tips and a brief discussion on the clinical aspects. This knowledge will hopefully aid radiologists in their interpretation of scans undertaken in melanoma patients.

Tip 1: Melanoma is the most common cancer type that metastasises to the GIT.

Tip 2: Radiological detection and reporting of melanoma metastases in the GIT are important, as early diagnosis and treatment improve quality and quantity of life.

Oesophagus and stomach

Primary melanoma of the oesophagus is rare, representing less than 0.1–0.5% of all oesophageal malignant tumours [17]. Since first described in 1895 by Spielberg [18], metastatic involvement of melanoma in the oesophagus was shown to be even rarer than primary oesophageal melanoma, with a reported incidence of 4% in a series of 125 autopsy cases of cutaneous melanoma [19]. Symptoms are similar to those caused by other oesophageal tumours and include dysphagia, weight loss, haematemesis and/or melaena. Metastatic oesophageal lesions are either mucosal or submucosal [19], with both contrast studies and endoscopy providing a reasonable diagnostic yield. Contrast barium oesophagram often reveals a polypoid intraluminal filling defect with or without ulceration. CT scan of the chest may reveal the tumour, as an eccentric or circumferential wall thickening (Fig. 2) or as lesions protruding into the lumen. However, endoscopy with tissue sampling often provides the definitive diagnosis. Nevertheless, differentiation between primary melanoma or secondary MM is often difficult at the preoperative stage. Oesophageal melanosis is important as it is assumed to be a predisposing factor. However, this is only seen in one quarter of cases of oesophageal melanomas [17].

Fig. 2figure 2

Arterial phase contrast-enhanced CT axial (a) and non-enhanced coronal (b) of a 58-year-old male patient demonstrating a large oesophageal metastatic melanoma mass (arrows) with luminal narrowing and compression of the left main bronchus (arrowhead). A nasogastric tube is in situ

The stomach, after the small bowel and colon, is the third most common GIT site involved by MM. Patients with MM in the stomach can present with nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal bleeding, weight loss and occasionally with acute perforation. CT imaging can suggest the diagnosis by the presence of a mural nodule or mass (Fig. 3), with or without cavitation, but definitive diagnosis is best achieved by endoscopy and biopsy. However, there is growing evidence that MRI with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) can provide improved early detection and characterisation of gastric lesions as well as local staging. The high cellularity and melanin content of melanoma metastases confer them with a high DWI signal, low ADC and in some cases a characteristic high T1 intensity [20,21,22].

Fig. 3figure 3

Gastric melanoma metastases. a Endoscopy of a 69-year-old female patient with a melanotic nodule in the proximal gastric body (arrow). b Oral and intravenous portal phase contrast-enhanced CT axial of a 42-year-old male patient with a sessile soft-tissue melanoma metastasis associated with the lesser curvature (arrow). cf Endoscopy and portal phase contrast-enhanced CT axial and sagittal of a 51-year-old male patient demonstrating a large melanoma metastasis within the body of the stomach with resulting luminal narrowing (arrows)

Endoscopic classification of gastric metastases include: (a) melanotic nodules (Fig. 3a), often ulcerated at the centre; and also the most frequent endoscopic feature, (b) submucosal tumour, melanotic or not, elevated and ulcerated at the apex; providing the typical aspect of “bull’s eye” lesions in barium meals, and (c) mass lesions with varying incidence of necrosis and melanosis [23]. Sometimes, it may also appear as simple ulcers [24]. Most gastric metastases from MM occur at the greater curvature of the body and fundus, with the lesser curvature lesions being uncommon (Fig. 3) [25].

Metastatic melanoma involving the oesophagus and/or stomach at the time of diagnosis is considered a sign of disseminated disease and thus has a poor prognosis. Although surgical treatment has been attempted in some melanoma patients with oesophageal and gastric metastases, surgery seems to be of limited practical value and should be performed only in carefully selected patients or in patients with complications [26].

Tip 3: Review of the oesophagus and stomach should always be performed when interpreting CT scans of melanoma patients, as lesions can sometimes be asymptomatic.

Tip 4: When reviewing the oesophagus, look for eccentric or circumferential wall thickening and/or lesions protruding into the lumen.

Tip 5: In the stomach, look for any mass lesions along the greater curvature of the body and fundus, as melanoma metastases tend to occur particularly at these sites.

Duodenum and small bowel

The small bowel is the most common metastatic site for melanoma in the GIT [19, 27]. Melanoma is the most common solid cancer type to metastasise to the small bowel (SB) [7, 8] with the jejunum and terminal ileum being the most commonly involved segments [28,29,30]. Although SB metastases are estimated to occur in up to 60% of patients with MM in post-mortem studies [19, 31, 32], clinical antemortem detection can be as low as 1–5% of cases [19]. Small bowel metastases are generally discovered either at the time of diagnosis, or not uncommonly several years after the primary malignancy (an average of around 7 years) [8]. This is believed to be due to the high expression of the chemokine ligand CCR9 in the small bowel, therefore promoting transmigration and homing of melanoma tumour cells which are known to have significant surface expression of the chemokine receptor CCR9 [33, 34]. Primary melanoma of the small bowel is rare, remaining a controversial diagnosis as it could be a metastasis from either an unidentified or a regressed primary cutaneous melanoma [35, 36].

The clinical presentation is usually non-specific, including vague abdominal pain, unexplained weight loss, iron-deficiency anaemia, change in bowel habits and GI bleeding, or even painless jaundice when in the duodenum [37], though a large portion will be asymptomatic. Rarely, patients can present with an acute abdomen due to intestinal obstruction, intussusception, perforation or fistula [27, 38,39,40]. As in other segments of the GIT, the diagnosis can be made by CT scanning, however endoscopy in the case of the duodenum and video-capsule for non-stenotic SB lesions are still the preferred methods to confirm the diagnosis [13]. CT/MR enterography/enteroclysis can be helpful for the non-invasive detection of small SB lesions. PET/CT is another option given its improved diagnostic accuracy over CT, with a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 97% [27], and additional potential for the detection of other secondary lesions, unknown primary or residual tumour [12, 27, 41, 42]. Nonetheless, definitive diagnosis can only be obtained histologically through surgical/endoscopic biopsy.

As imaging patterns of duodenal/SB involvement can be diverse and mimic several other conditions, including other primary tumours, lymphoma or benign conditions such as infection or haemorrhage, it is important to keep melanoma as a possible differential in patients with a prior history of melanoma and/or with evidence of widespread disease involving other organs. In the duodenum and SB, the melanoma deposits more frequently present as polypoid nodules [43] (Fig. 4), and less frequently as ulcerating mural nodules/masses (Fig. 5), aneurysmal lesions which are classically attributed to lymphoma [44, 45] (Fig. 6), or infiltrating masses (Fig. 7). The classic finding on barium follow-through imaging is a target lesion or “bull's eye” lesion, but this is infrequently found. Additional detection of other ancillary features such as cystic lymphadenopathy (Fig. 6) and extra-intestinal metastatic lesions in unusual sites like soft tissues/subcutaneous fat, peritoneum and gallbladder (Figs. 4, 6), can point towards the correct diagnosis. Indeed, more than 50% of the patients with MM and GIT involvement will also have other sites and organs affected [6]. Also, the presence of SB intussusception in adults should raise concerns for metastatic melanoma (Fig. 8).

Fig. 4figure 4

Oral and intravenous portal phase contrast-enhanced CT axial (a, b) and coronal (c) of an 85-year-old male patient with numerous small melanoma metastases throughout the bowel with nodular mucosal thickening (arrows in a, c), metastatic peritoneal nodules (arrowhead in a), gallbladder metastasis (arrow in b), liver metastasis (* in c) and subcutaneous metastasis (thin arrow in a)

Fig. 5figure 5

Oral and intravenous portal phase contrast-enhanced CT axial (a) and coronal (c) of a 70-year-old male patient with an eccentric mural melanoma metastasis within the proximal jejunum (arrows). PET-CT axial (b) and coronal (d) demonstrating FDG avidity with an SUVmax of 21.7 (arrows)

Fig. 6figure 6

Duodenal and small bowel metastases. Portal phase contrast-enhanced CT axial (a) of an 80-year-old male patient with a large aneurysmal metastatic melanoma mass in the duodenum (arrow) and adjacent necrotic node (arrowhead). Oral and intravenous portal phase contrast-enhanced CT axial of a 57-year-old male patient with large jejunal melanoma metastasis (b: arrow) and anterior peritoneal nodule (c: arrow)

Fig. 7figure 7

Portal phase contrast-enhanced CT axial and coronal (a, b) of a 71-year-old male patient demonstrating a large cavitating small bowel melanoma metastasis with urinary bladder tethering and dome invasion (arrows). Further separate caecal pole metastasis (arrowhead)

Fig. 8figure 8

Portal phase contrast-enhanced CT axial (a, b) and oblique coronal (c) of a 71-year-old female patient with ileal melanoma metastasis with resulting obstructing intussusception (arrows)

Despite the significant clinical impact of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma, operative management remains the mainstay treatment for small bowel melanoma, with growing evidence that early diagnosis and treatment can improve rates of survival [14], and quality of life even in palliative cases.

Tip 6: Melanoma is the most common primary malignancy to metastasise to the SB. Always consider melanoma in your differentials, particularly if there is a past medical history of melanoma.

Tip 7: Metastatic melanoma of the SB can have diverse appearances and mimic other diseases. Looking for extra-intestinal metastases is important to increase diagnostic confidence.

Tip 8: Be suspicious of metastatic melanoma in adult patients with SB intussusceptions, particularly if there is a past history of melanoma.

Colon, rectum and anus

Melanoma metastases are uncommon in the large bowel, rectum and anus, with a predicted incidence of 15–22% in the colon [19, 27], 5% in the rectum and 1% in the anus [6, 19]. As in other parts of the GIT, primary mucosal melanomas can occur, with most arising in the anorectal lining. However, differentiation between primary melanoma and metastatic melanoma can still be difficult, often requiring careful histological assessment [39].

Clinically, abdominal pain and weight loss are the most common presenting symptoms, with bleeding and a palpable mass being less frequently reported. As with the SB metastases, patients can rarely present with an acute abdomen due to intestinal obstruction, intussusception, perforation, or fistula [27, 38,39,40]. Though CT imaging may raise initial suspicions on the presence of lesions, colonoscopy has the greatest diagnostic value with high sensitivity and specificity, and also allows collection of tissue for histology. Melanoma metastases in the colon can be multiple and diverse in appearance, spanning from polypoid nodules/masses (Figs. 7b, 9) to ulcerating mural nodules, exo-enteric lesions and infiltrating masses [27]. At the anorectal region, melanoma metastases are usually seen as an intraluminal polypoid or fungating mass in the distal rectum or anal canal (Figs. 10, 11, 12, 13). MRI is the favoured imaging technique for characterisation of lesions at this level due to its improved soft-tissue resolution, with melanoma metastases classically described as having high-signal intensity on T1-weighted (T1W) imaging (Fig. 14) and mixed-signal intensity on T2-weighted (T2W) imaging (Fig. 10) and marked enhancement on post-contrast T1-weighted images [46, 47]. When compared with primary anorectal tumours, MM tends to demonstrate a more perirectal infiltrative growth pattern with a preferential submucosal spread [48] (Fig. 10, 11). Lymphatic involvement and extension to the pelvic side wall and pre-sacral space are common findings at the time of diagnosis (Figs. 11, 12). However, luminal obstruction is rarer in anorectal melanoma than in primary adenocarcinoma, which is frequently obstructive as a consequence of the infiltration and narrowing of the lumen [47].

Fig. 9

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif