Chronic Stress, Genetic Risk, and Obesity in US Hispanic/Latinos: Results From the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is an important public health problem in the Hispanic/Latino population. Data from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) demonstrated a high prevalence of obesity in both women and men (1,2). US-born individuals and those living longer in the United States have the highest prevalence of obesity, suggesting that environmental influences are at play (2). Economic hardship and stress are important determinants of obesity in HCHS/SOL (3,4). In particular, compared with those with no stressors, participants reporting three or more chronic stressors had higher odds of having obesity. This association was not fully explained by physical activity, energy intake, or depressive symptoms, suggesting that there may be a direct pathway linking psychosocial distress to obesity.

Body mass index (BMI) and obesity also have genetic influences (5,6). Genome-wide association studies have identified several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with BMI and obesity risk (6). There is strong interest in the interplay between environmental and genetic factors, and studies have demonstrated gene-environment interactions. One such study showed that the genetic effects on obesity were attenuated among individuals who were physically active (7). HCHS/SOL previously reported that the associations of a BMI-genetic risk score with BMI and other adiposity measures were stronger at low levels of physical activity and high levels of sedentary behaviors (8). However, gene-environment interactions of psychosocial factors have been explored less frequently (9,10). Because psychosocial stress is an important risk factor in Hispanic/Latinos (4,11–14), HCHS/SOL provides a valuable opportunity to examine the contribution of psychosocial factors and genetic risk to BMI and obesity, given the comprehensive psychosocial and biobehavioral characterization of participants in the cohort. In this analysis, we investigate whether the association of chronic stress is independent of genetic risk and whether there is an interaction between chronic stress and genetic risk in a large sample of Hispanic/Latino adults.

METHODS

HCHS/SOL is a population-based cohort study of 16,415 Hispanic/Latino adults (ages 18–74 years) who were selected using a multistage probability sampling design from four US communities (Chicago, IL; Miami, FL; Bronx, NY; San Diego, CA). Participants had an in-person baseline examination between 2008 and 2011, and a second examination took place approximately 6 years later (2014–2017). In this second examination, cardiometabolic assessments were repeated, and participants were also asked to complete a psychosocial questionnaire that included a measure of self-reported chronic stress. Details about the aims and methodology of HCHS/SOL are published elsewhere (15–17). Of the 11623 participants who completed the in-person second examination, 3056 were excluded because they were missing the stress measure (n = 619), genetic data (n = 2502), and BMI (n = 378), or had BMI <18.5 kg/m2 (n = 69), leaving a final analytic sample of N = 8567.

BMI and Obesity

Height and weight were obtained at each field center as part of the HCHS/SOL second examination. Height (in centimeters) was measured with a wall stadiometer (SECA 222, Hamburg, Germany), and weight (in kilograms) was obtained with a digital scale (Tanita Body Composition Analyzer; TBF 300, Tokyo, Japan). BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. BMI values were used to define presence of obesity according to National Heart Lung and Blood Institute guidelines (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2) (18). Individuals who were in the underweight category (n = 69) were excluded because underweight may indicate the presence of severe disease.

Chronic Stress Burden

Participants completed the eight-item chronic burden scale where participants were asked about the presence of ongoing stressors in major life domains (e.g., health, job, financial, relationship, network problems), whether the stressor has been ongoing for 6 months or more, and the severity of the stressor. To indicate the severity of the stressor, participants reported on a 3-point scale if the event was “not very stressful,” “moderately stressful,” or “very stressful.” A total count score (range, 0–8) was calculated for the stressors endorsed as ongoing for 6 months and were reported as being moderately or very stressful (12,19–21).

Polygenic Risk Score

Genetic data were obtained from the HCHS/SOL Custom 15041502 B3 SNP array (Illumina Omni 2.5M array plus ∼150,000 custom SNPs); this was followed by imputation based on the TOPMed freeze 5b from diverse ethnicities including Hispanic/Latino populations. An iterative procedure to simultaneously estimate principal components reflecting population structure and kinship coefficients measuring familial relatedness has been described elsewhere (17). The Hispanic/Latino background was identified to be Cuban, Dominican, Puerto Rican, Mexican, Central American, and South American from the combination of self-identified Hispanic/Latino background and genetic principal components. BMI polygenic risk score (PRS) in HCHS/SOL was calculated by PRSice (22) based on summary statistics from GIANT and UK BioBank meta-analysis of BMI genome-wide association studies (23). After clumping the SNP set according to the LD structure in HCHS/SOL (clumping parameter R2 = 0.1 and distance of 1000 kbp), 22,715 BMI-associated SNPs were selected with p value in the summary statistics <0.01 and minor allele frequency <0.01. The BMI PRS in HCHS/SOL was calculated by taking the summation of the effect size per effective allele × number of effective alleles/number of alleles included for an individual. Different p value thresholds were considered, and the mean squared errors of a model with the constructed BMI PRS were compared. Because higher p value showed lower mean squared error, a p value cutoff of .01 was chosen, as described by Elgart et al. (24).

Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity

Detailed information on objective measurement of sedentary behavior and physical activity in HCHS/SOL has been described elsewhere (25,26). Briefly, at the HCHS/SOL baseline examination, participants were asked to wear an omnidirectional accelerometer (Actical B-1 version; model 198-0200-03; Respironics Co. Inc., Bend, Oregon) above the iliac crest for 7 days, except for swimming, showering, and sleeping. The accelerometer measured omnidirectional accelerations in counts and steps in 1-minute epochs. Nonwear time was determined by at least 90 consecutive minutes of zero counts, allowing for 1 or 2 minutes of nonzero counts in a ±30-minute window, using the Choi algorithm (27). An adherent day was defined as at least 10 hours of wear time, and at least 3 adherent days was required for inclusion in this analysis. Accelerometer data were summarized as total minutes per day by activity level: sedentary time, <100 counts/min; light activity, 100–1534 counts/min; moderate activity, 1535–3961 counts/min; and vigorous activity, >3962 counts/min. To mitigate the influence of selection bias on our results and to account for missing or incomplete accelerometer data, inverse probability weighting was implemented as described previously (25). Because of a high correlation between sedentary time and wear time (r2 = 0.83), we used the standardized sedentary time to 16 hours of wear time per day (the approximate average of both daily wear time and awake time in our study), by regressing out wear time from the sedentary time (25). After standardization, sedentary time was not correlated with wear time (r2 = 0.08).

Sociodemographic Variables

Participants also reported their Hispanic/Latino background (Central American, Cuban, Dominican, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South American, and other/mixed), date of birth, sex, place of birth, years living in the United States, household income, and educational attainment.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics of the study population were summarized by using the count and percentage for categorical variables and the mean and SE for continuous variables, accounting for the complex study design. We examined whether there was an interaction between chronic stress and BMI PRS on obesity using mixed-effect logistic models and linear mixed-effect models for BMI. Models accounted for genetic relatedness, same household, and sampling block. All models included sampling weights, age, field center, sex, and five genetic principal components as fixed effects. Genetic relatedness, household, and sampling block were included as random effects. These models were further adjusted for sedentary time, moderate/vigorous physical activity, and household annual income. All statistical tests were two-sided, and analyses were performed using R (version 3.6.1; R Foundation) (28).

RESULTS Study Characteristics

Among 5336 women and 3231 men, the average age was 47.9 years (range, 23–95 years) (Table 1). Individuals were predominantly born outside of the 50 US states (77%) and had low socioeconomic status: 36.5% reported an annual household income <$20,000, and 29.4% did not graduate from high school. The prevalence of obesity in this sample was 43.5% (46.9% in women and 38.9% in men). The number of chronic stressors ranged from 0 to 8, with financial and health-related stressors being the most common (Table 2).

TABLE 1 - Characteristics of the Study Population (N = 8567), HCHS/SOL (2014–2017) All, Mean (SE) or % Without Obesity a (n = 4761) With Obesity a (n = 3806) p Age, y 47.9 (0.3) 47.8 (0.4) 48.0 (0.4) .79 Sex, % female 51.2 48.1 55.2 <.001 Hispanic background, % .009  Dominican 9.6 9.5 9.8  Cuban 23.4 23.1 23.7  Mexican 36.6 37.5 35.4  Puerto Rican 16.5 15.5 17.7  Central American 8.2 7.6 9.0  South American 5.8 6.8 4.4 Less than high school education, % 29.4 28.6 30.3 .25 Annually family income .001   < $20,000 34.8 32.9 37.3  $20,000–$50,000 41.0 41.6 40.1   >$50,000 19.7 21.5 17.4  Missing 4.5 4.0 5.2 Born within US 50 states 22.9 21.5 24.6 .055 Born outside US 50 states and with ≥10 yr in the United States 84.2 84.6 87.1 .067 No. stressors, % <.001  0 26.1 30.0 21.0  1–2 44.5 44.1 45.1  3+ 29.4 26.0 34.0

HCHS/SOL = Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos; SE = standard error.

a Obesity is defined as body mass index ≥30 kg/m2.


TABLE 2 - Distribution of Each Reported Chronic Stressor, HCHS/SOL (2014–2017) Chronic Stressor % Without Obesity With Obesity p Personal serious health problem 29.2 26.1 33.2 <.001 Close person with health problem 33.3 29.8 37.9 <.001 Ability to work/difficulty at work 12.9 10.4 16.1 <.001 Financial strain 34.7 30.8 39.8 <.001 Relationship difficulties 19.7 18.5 21.3 .048 Someone close: alcohol/drug use 16.8 17.3 16.0 .28 Help someone close: sick/limited/frail 28.6 26.8 31.0 .002 Other problem not listed 5.3 4.9 5.8 .22

HCHS/SOL = Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.


Chronic Stress, Genetic Risk, BMI, and Obesity

Greater number of chronic stressors and higher BMI-PRS were both associated with higher BMI (β [log odds] = 0.28 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.20–0.37] and β [log odds] = 1.52 [95% CI = 1.37–1.67], respectively) after adjustment for potential confounders including sedentary behavior and time spent in moderate/vigorous physical activity (Table 3). Chronic stress explained 0.79% of the variance of BMI, whereas the PRS explained 5.9%. Chronic stress and the PRS were also associated with higher log odds of obesity (β [log odds] = 0.10 [95% CI = 0.07–0.13] and β [log odds] = 0.47 [95% CI = 0.42–0.52], respectively), adjusting for sedentary behavior and moderate/vigorous physical activity, which did not change the magnitude of effects. No interactions between chronic stress and PRS were observed for BMI (β for interaction = 0.01 [95% CI = −0.06 to 0.08]; p = .77) or obesity (β for interaction = −0.01 [95% CI = −0.04 to 0.01]; p = .32).

TABLE 3 - Association of Obesity (or BMI) With Chronic Stress and Polygenic Risk Score (N = 8567), HCHS/SOL (2014–2017) Obesity BMI β (95% CI) p β (95% CI) p Model 1  Chronic stress (per stressor) 0.10 (0.07–0.13) <.001 0.31 (0.23–0.38) <.001  PRS (per 1 SD) 0.47 (0.42–0.52) <.001 1.54 (1.41–1.68) <.001 Model 2  Chronic stress (per stressor) 0.10 (0.07–0.13) <.001 0.28 (0.20–0.37) <.001  PRS (per 1 SD) 0.47 (0.41–0.53) <.001 1.52 (1.37–1.67) <.001

HCHS/SOL = Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos; BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval; PRS = polygenic risk score; SD = standard deviation.

Model 1: chronic stress and the PRS are simultaneously entered in the models. Models are adjusted for sampling weight, age, center, sex, and 5 genetic principal components as fixed effects and relatedness, block group, and household as random effects.

Model 2: adjusted for variables in model 1 plus household income, time in sedentary behaviors, and moderate/vigorous physical activity.


DISCUSSION

In analyses that adjusted for genetic risk, the study showed that there were small but significant associations of chronic stress and BMI and obesity. However, contrary to expectations, the relationship between chronic stress and obesity was not modified by genetic risk. Although in this study, an interaction was not observed, the findings contribute to the emergent field of gene-environment interaction in obesity (29–33). Environmental influences of obesity are strong and are shown to be modified by genetics effects. Brandkvist et al. (34) in a large population-based Norwegian cohort showed that the increases in BMI from the 1960s to the 2000s were greater among those with greater genetic risk, suggesting an interaction between genetic risk and the obesogenic environment that has been more common in recent decades. However, there are limited reports of how psychosocial risk factors modify genetic influences. A study of Chinese children showed that higher hair cortisol levels, a biological correlate of chronic stress, exacerbated the genetic influence on BMI (35). The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, a cohort of middle-aged adults, reported an interaction of the early B-cell factor 1 gene (EBF1; a gene involved in the development of the immune system) and chronic stress that resulted in greater adiposity measures among Whites only (10). A Korean study, on the other hand, found that one SNP (rs2239219) of the RGS6 gene, which regulates protein signaling in the brain and other tissues, was related to greater abdominal adiposity in the context of high psychosocial stress (9). These contradictory results may be related to differences in the type of psychosocial factors chosen for the analysis.

This study addresses an important research gap, as data on psychosocial factors in gene-environment interaction associations are still limited. This gap is particularly important for racial/ethnic minorities, who are generally underrepresented in genomic studies but have a greater disease burden due to the social and economic environments in which they live. However, results must be interpreted with caution because of several methodological limitations. A relatively small sample size may explain the nonsignificant interactions observed. Furthermore, the study did not have the power to explore sex differences (three-way interaction), which may be important (31). Another limitation is that chronic stress and the PRS explained a small proportion of the variance in BMI (<1%, for chronic stress and 5.9% for PRS). As the methods for deriving PRS evolve to better capture genetic risk in racial/ethnic minorities, we may be able to improve the genetic prediction of these conditions and perhaps improve the ability to detect interaction effects. Future studies may also need to adopt a multidimensional approach for defining psychosocial stress to better capture relationships between stress, obesity, and genetic risk.

In summary, our findings confirmed our prior report relating higher stressors with higher BMI and obesity. These associations, although small, were present even after the adjustment for the underlying genetic risk, which support continuing to include stress reduction strategies in obesity management programs. We did not find evidence for an interaction between chronic stress and the BMI-PRS, which was not consistent with other publications that showed greater BMI or obesity in the groups with high stressors and elevated genetic risk. Future studies may consider the use of other approaches for assessing psychosocial stress in gene-environment interaction studies.

Source of Funding and Conflicts of Interest: The authors do not report any conflict of interest. The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos was supported by contracts from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) to the University of North Carolina (N01-HC65233), University of Miami (N01-HC65234), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (N01-HC65235), the University of Illinois at Chicago (HHSN268201300003I), Northwestern University (N01-HC65236), and San Diego State University (N01-HC65237). The following institutes/centers/offices contributed to the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos through a transfer of funds to the NHLBI: National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communications Disorders, the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke, and the Office of Dietary Supplements. Additional support was provided by grant R01MD013320 and the Life Course Methodology Core at Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the New York Regional Center for Diabetes Translation Research (P30 DK111022-8786 and P30 DK111022) through funds from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NHLBI or the National Institutes of Health.

REFERENCES 1. Kaplan RC, Aviles-Santa ML, Parrinello CM, Hanna DB, Jung M, Castaneda SF, Hankinson AL, Isasi CR, Birnbaum-Weitzman O, Kim RS, Daviglus ML, Talavera GA, Schneiderman N, Cai J. Body mass index, sex, and cardiovascular disease risk factors among Hispanic/Latino adults: Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e000923. 2. Isasi CR, Ayala GX, Sotres-Alvarez D, Madanat H, Penedo F, Loria CM, Elder JP, Daviglus ML, Barnhart J, Siega-Riz AM, Van Horn L, Schneiderman N. Is acculturation related to obesity in Hispanic/Latino adults? Results from the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos. J Obes 2015;2015:186276. 3. Isasi CR, Jung M, Parrinello CM, Kaplan RC, Kim R, Crespo NC, Gonzalez P, Gouskova NA, Penedo FJ, Perreira KM, Perrino T, Sotres-Alvarez D, Van Horn L, Gallo LC. Association of childhood economic hardship with adult height and adult adiposity among Hispanics/Latinos. The HCHS/SOL socio-cultural ancillary study. PLoS One 2016;11:e0149923. 4. Isasi CR, Parrinello CM, Jung MM, Carnethon MR, Birnbaum-Weitzman O, Espinoza RA, Penedo FJ, Perreira KM, Schneiderman N, Sotres-Alvarez D, Van Horn L, Gallo LC. Psychosocial stress is associated with obesity and diet quality in Hispanic/Latino adults. Ann Epidemiol 2015;25:84–9. 5. Turcot V, Lu Y, Highland HM, Schurmann C, Justice AE, Fine RS, Bradfield JP, Esko T, Giri A, Graff M, Guo X, Hendricks AE, Karaderi T, Lempradl A, Locke AE, Mahajan A, Marouli E, Sivapalaratnam S, Young KL, Alfred T, Feitosa MF, Masca NGD, Manning AK, Medina-Gomez C, Mudgal P, Ng MCY, Reiner AP, Vedantam S, Willems SM, Winkler TW, Abecasis G, Aben KK, Alam DS, Alharthi SE, Allison M, Amouyel P, Asselbergs FW, Auer PL, Balkau B, Bang LE, Barroso I, Bastarache L, Benn M, Bergmann S, Bielak LF, Bluher M, Boehnke M, Boeing H, Boerwinkle E, Boger CA, Bork-Jensen J, Bots ML, Bottinger EP, Bowden DW, Brandslund I, Breen G, Brilliant MH, Broer L, Brumat M, Burt AA, Butterworth AS, Campbell PT, Cappellani S, Carey DJ, Catamo E, Caulfield MJ, Chambers JC, Chasman DI, Chen YI, Chowdhury R, Christensen C, Chu AY, Cocca M, Collins FS, Cook JP, Corley J, Corominas Galbany J, Cox AJ, Crosslin DS, Cuellar-Partida G, D’Eustacchio A, Danesh J, Davies G, Bakker PIW, Groot MCH, Mutsert R, Deary IJ, Dedoussis G, Demerath EW, Heijer M, Hollander AI, Ruijter HM, Dennis JG, Denny JC, Di Angelantonio E, Drenos F, Du M, Dube MP, Dunning AM, Easton DF, Edwards TL, Ellinghaus D, Ellinor PT, Elliott P, Evangelou E, Farmaki AE, Farooqi IS, Faul JD, Fauser S, Feng S, Ferrannini E, Ferrieres J, Florez JC, Ford I, Fornage M, Franco OH, Franke A, Franks PW, Friedrich N, Frikke-Schmidt R, Galesloot TE, Gan W, Gandin I, Gasparini P, Gibson J, Giedraitis V, Gjesing AP, Gordon-Larsen P, Gorski M, Grabe HJ, Grant SFA, Grarup N, Griffiths HL, Grove ML, Gudnason V, Gustafsson S, Haessler J, Hakonarson H, Hammerschlag AR, Hansen T, Harris KM, Harris TB, Hattersley AT, Have CT, Hayward C, He L, Heard-Costa NL, Heath AC, Heid IM, Helgeland O, Hernesniemi J, Hewitt AW, Holmen OL, Hovingh GK, Howson JMM, Hu Y, Huang PL, Huffman JE, Ikram MA, Ingelsson E, Jackson AU, Jansson JH, Jarvik GP, Jensen GB, Jia Y, Johansson S, Jorgensen ME, Jorgensen T, Jukema JW, Kahali B, Kahn RS, Kahonen M, Kamstrup PR, Kanoni S, Kaprio J, Karaleftheri M, Kardia SLR, Karpe F, Kathiresan S, Kee F, Kiemeney LA, Kim E, Kitajima H, Komulainen P, Kooner JS, Kooperberg C, Korhonen T, Kovacs P, Kuivaniemi H, Kutalik Z, Kuulasmaa K, Kuusisto J, Laakso M, Lakka TA, Lamparter D, Lange EM, Lange LA, Langenberg C, Larson EB, Lee NR, Lehtimaki T, Lewis CE, Li H, Li J, Li-Gao R, Lin H, Lin KH, Lin LA, Lin X, Lind L, Lindstrom J, Linneberg A, Liu CT, Liu DJ, Liu Y, Lo KS, Lophatananon A, Lotery AJ, Loukola A, Luan J, Lubitz SA, Lyytikainen LP, Mannisto S, Marenne G, Mazul AL, McCarthy MI, McKean-Cowdin R, Medland SE, Meidtner K, Milani L, Mistry V, Mitchell P, Mohlke KL, Moilanen L, Moitry M, Montgomery GW, Mook-Kanamori DO, Moore C, Mori TA, Morris AD, Morris AP, Muller-Nurasyid M, Munroe PB, Nalls MA, Narisu N, Nelson CP, Neville M, Nielsen SF, Nikus K, Njolstad PR, Nordestgaard BG, Nyholt DR, O’Connel JR, O’Donoghue ML, Olde Loohuis LM, Ophoff RA, Owen KR, Packard CJ, Padmanabhan S, Palmer CNA, Palmer ND, Pasterkamp G, Patel AP, Pattie A, Pedersen O, Peissig PL, Peloso GM, Pennell CE, Perola M, Perry JA, Perry JRB, Pers TH, Person TN, Peters A, Petersen ERB, Peyser PA, Pirie A, Polasek O, Polderman TJ, Puolijoki H, Raitakari OT, Rasheed A, Rauramaa R, Reilly DF, Renstrom F, Rheinberger M, Ridker PM, Rioux JD, Rivas MA, Roberts DJ, Robertson NR, Robino A, Rolandsson O, Rudan I, Ruth KS, Saleheen D, Salomaa V, Samani NJ, Sapkota Y, Sattar N, Schoen RE, Schreiner PJ, Schulze MB, Scott RA, Segura-Lepe MP, Shah SH, Sheu WH, Sim X, Slater AJ, Small KS, Smith AV, Southam L, Spector TD, Speliotes EK, Starr JM, Stefansson K, Steinthorsdottir V, Stirrups KE, Strauch K, Stringham HM, Stumvoll M, Sun L, Surendran P, Swift AJ, Tada H, Tansey KE, Tardif JC, Taylor KD, Teumer A, Thompson DJ, Thorleifsson G, Thorsteinsdottir U, Thuesen BH, Tonjes A, Tromp G, Trompet S, Tsafantakis E, Tuomilehto J, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Tyrer JP, Uher R, Uitterlinden AG, Uusitupa M, Laan SW, Duijn CM, Leeuwen N, van Setten J, Vanhala M, Varbo A, Varga TV, Varma R, Velez Edwards DR, Vermeulen SH, Veronesi G, Vestergaard H, Vitart V, Vogt TF, Volker U, Vuckovic D, Wagenknecht LE, Walker M, Wallentin L, Wang F, Wang CA, Wang S, Wang Y, Ware EB, Wareham NJ, Warren HR, Waterworth DM, Wessel J, White HD, Willer CJ, Wilson JG, Witte DR, Wood AR, Wu Y, Yaghootkar H, Yao J, Yao P, Yerges-Armstrong LM, Young R, Zeggini E, Zhan X, Zhang W, Zhao JH, Zhao W, Zhao W, Zhou W, Zondervan KT, Rotter JI, Pospisilik JA, Rivadeneira F, Borecki IB, Deloukas P, Frayling TM, Lettre G, North KE, Lindgren CM, Hirschhorn JN, Loos RJF; CHD Exome+ Consortium; EPIC-CVD Consortium; ExomeBP Consortium; Global Lipids Genetic Consortium; GoT2D Genes Consortium; EPIC InterAct Consortium; INTERVAL Study; ReproGen Consortium; T2D-Genes Consortium; MAGIC Investigators; Understanding Society Scientific Group. Protein-altering variants associated with body mass index implicate pathways that control energy intake and expenditure in obesity. Nat Genet 2018;50:26–41. 6. Locke AE, Kahali B, Berndt SI, Justice AE, Pers TH, Day FR, Powell C, Vedantam S, Buchkovich ML, Yang J, Croteau-Chonka DC, Esko T, Fall T, Ferreira T, Gustafsson S, Kutalik Z, Luan J, Magi R, Randall JC, Winkler TW, Wood AR, Workalemahu T, Faul JD, Smith JA, Zhao JH, Zhao W, Chen J, Fehrmann R, Hedman AK, Karjalainen J, Schmidt EM, Absher D, Amin N, Anderson D, Beekman M, Bolton JL, Bragg-Gresham JL, Buyske S, Demirkan A, Deng G, Ehret GB, Feenstra B, Feitosa MF, Fischer K, Goel A, Gong J, Jackson AU, Kanoni S, Kleber ME, Kristiansson K, Lim U, Lotay V, Mangino M, Leach IM, Medina-Gomez C, Medland SE, Nalls MA, Palmer CD, Pasko D, Pechlivanis S, Peters MJ, Prokopenko I, Shungin D, Stancakova A, Strawbridge RJ, Sung YJ, Tanaka T, Teumer A, Trompet S, van der Laan SW, van Setten J, Van Vliet-Ostaptchouk JV, Wang Z, Yengo L, Zhang W, Isaacs A, Albrecht E, Arnlov J, Arscott GM, Attwood AP, Bandinelli S, Barrett A, Bas IN, Bellis C, Bennett AJ, Berne C, Blagieva R, Bluher M, Bohringer S, Bonnycastle LL, Bottcher Y, Boyd HA, Bruinenberg M, Caspersen IH, Chen YI, Clarke R, Daw EW, de Craen AJM, Delgado G, Dimitriou M, Doney ASF, Eklund N, Estrada K, Eury E, Folkersen L, Fraser RM, Garcia ME, Geller F, Giedraitis V, Gigante B, Go AS, Golay A, Goodall AH, Gordon SD, Gorski M, Grabe HJ, Grallert H, Grammer TB, Grassler J, Gronberg H, Groves CJ, Gusto G, Haessler J, Hall P, Haller T, Hallmans G, Hartman CA, Hassinen M, Hayward C, Heard-Costa NL, Helmer Q, Hengstenberg C, Holmen O, Hottenga JJ, James AL, Jeff JM, Johansson A, Jolley J, Juliusdottir T, Kinnunen L, Koenig W, Koskenvuo M, Kratzer W, Laitinen J, Lamina C, Leander K, Lee NR, Lichtner P, Lind L, Lindstrom J, Lo KS, Lobbens S, Lorbeer R, Lu Y, Mach F, Magnusson PKE, Mahajan A, McArdle WL, McLachlan S, Menni C, Merger S, Mihailov E, Milani L, Moayyeri A, Monda KL, Morken MA, Mulas A, Muller G, Muller-Nurasyid M, Musk AW, Nagaraja R, Nothen MM, Nolte IM, Pilz S, Rayner NW, Renstrom F, Rettig R, Ried JS, Ripke S, Robertson NR, Rose LM, Sanna S, Scharnagl H, Scholtens S, Schumacher FR, Scott WR, Seufferlein T, Shi J, Smith AV, Smolonska J, Stanton AV, Steinthorsdottir V, Stirrups K, Stringham HM, Sundstrom J, Swertz MA, Swift AJ, Syvanen AC, Tan ST, Tayo BO, Thorand B, Thorleifsson G, Tyrer JP, Uh HW, Vandenput L, Verhulst FC, Vermeulen SH, Verweij N, Vonk JM, Waite LL, Warren HR, Waterworth D, Weedon MN, Wilkens LR, Willenborg C, Wilsgaard T, Wojczynski MK, Wong A, Wright AF, Zhang Q, Brennan EP, Choi M, Dastani Z, Drong AW, Eriksson P, Franco-Cereceda A, Gadin JR, Gharavi AG, Goddard ME, Handsaker RE, Huang J, Karpe F, Kathiresan S, Keildson S, Kiryluk K, Kubo M, Lee JY, Liang L, Lifton RP, Ma B, McCarroll SA, McKnight AJ, Min JL, Moffatt MF, Montgomery GW, Murabito JM, Nicholson G, Nyholt DR, Okada Y, Perry JRB, Dorajoo R, Reinmaa E, Salem RM, Sandholm N, Scott RA, Stolk L, Takahashi A, Tanaka T, van’t Hooft FM, Vinkhuyzen AAE, Westra HJ, Zheng W, Zondervan KT, Heath AC, Arveiler D, Bakker SJL, Beilby J, Bergman RN, Blangero J, Bovet P, Campbell H, Caulfield MJ, Cesana G, Chakravarti A, Chasman DI, Chines PS, Collins FS, Crawford DC, Cupples LA, Cusi D, Danesh J, de Faire U, den Ruijter HM, Dominiczak AF, Erbel R, Erdmann J, Eriksson JG, Farrall M, Felix SB, Ferrannini E, Ferrieres J, Ford I, Forouhi NG, Forrester T, Franco OH, Gansevoort RT, Gejman PV, Gieger C, Gottesman O, Gudnason V, Gyllensten U, Hall AS, Harris TB, Hattersley AT, Hicks AA, Hindorff LA, Hingorani AD, Hofman A, Homuth G, Hovingh GK, Humphries SE, Hunt SC, Hypponen E, Illig T, Jacobs KB, Jarvelin MR, Jockel KH, Johansen B, Jousilahti P, Jukema JW, Jula AM, Kaprio J, Kastelein JJP, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi SM, Kiemeney LA, Knekt P, Kooner JS, Kooperberg C, Kovacs P, Kraja AT, Kumari M, Kuusisto J, Lakka TA, Langenberg C, Marchand LL, Lehtimaki T, Lyssenko V, Mannisto S, Marette A, Matise TC, McKenzie CA, McKnight B, Moll FL, Morris AD, Morris AP, Murray JC, Nelis M, Ohlsson C, Oldehinkel AJ, Ong KK, Madden PAF, Pasterkamp G, Peden JF, Peters A, Postma DS, Pramstaller PP, Price JF, Qi L, Raitakari OT, Rankinen T, Rao DC, Rice TK, Ridker PM, Rioux JD, Ritchie MD, Rudan I, Salomaa V, Samani NJ, Saramies J, Sarzynski MA, Schunkert H, Schwarz PEH, Sever P, Shuldiner AR, Sinisalo J, Stolk RP, Strauch K, Tonjes A, Tregouet DA, Tremblay A, Tremoli E, Virtamo J, Vohl MC, Volker U, Waeber G, Willemsen G, Witteman JC, Zillikens MC, Adair LS, Amouyel P, Asselbergs FW, Assimes TL, Bochud M, Boehm BO, Boerwinkle E, Bornstein SR, Bottinger EP, Bouchard C, Cauchi S, Chambers JC, Chanock SJ, Cooper RS, de Bakker PIW, Dedoussis G, Ferrucci L, Franks PW, Froguel P, Groop LC, Haiman CA, Hamsten A, Hui J, Hunter DJ, Hveem K, Kaplan RC, Kivimaki M, Kuh D, Laakso M, Liu Y, Martin NG, Marz W, Melbye M, Metspalu A, Moebus S, Munroe PB, Njolstad I, Oostra BA, Palmer CNA, Pedersen NL, Perola M, Perusse L, Peters U, Power C, Quertermous T, Rauramaa R, Rivadeneira F, Saaristo TE, Saleheen D, Sattar N, Schadt EE, Schlessinger D, Slagboom PE, Snieder H, Spector TD, Thorsteinsdottir U, Stumvoll M, Tuomilehto J, Uitterlinden AG, Uusitupa M, van der Harst P, Walker M, Wallaschofski H, Wareham NJ, Watkins H, Weir DR, Wichmann HE, Wilson JF, Zanen P, Borecki IB, Deloukas P, Fox CS, Heid IM, O’Connell JR, Strachan DP, Stefansson K, van Duijn CM, Abecasis GR, Franke L, Frayling TM, McCarthy MI, Visscher PM, Scherag A, Willer CJ, Boehnke M, Mohlke KL, Lindgren CM, Beckmann JS, Barroso I, North KE, Ingelsson E, Hirschhorn JN, Loos RJF, Speliotes EK; LifeLines Cohort Study; ADIPOGen Consortium; AGEN-BMI Working Group; CARDIOGRAMplusC4D Consortium; CKDGen Consortium; GLGC; ICBP; MAGIC Investigators; MuTHER Consortium; MIGen Consortium; PAGE Consortium; ReproGen Consortium; GENIE Consortium; International Endogene Consortium. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature 2015;518:197–206. 7. Li S, Zhao JH, Luan J, Ekelund U, Luben RN, Khaw K-T, Wareham NJ, Loos RJF. Physical activity attenuates the genetic predisposition to obesity in 20,000 men and women from EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000332. 8. Moon J-Y, Wang T, Sofer T, North KE, Isasi CR, Cai J, Gellman MD, Moncrieft AE, Sotres-Alvarez D, Argos M, Kaplan RC, Qi Q. Objectively measured physical activity, sedentary behavior, and genetic predisposition to obesity in U.S. Hispanics/Latinos: results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). Diabetes 2017;66:3001–12. 9. Kim H-J, Min J-Y, Min K-B. Interaction between the RGS6 gene and psychosocial stress on obesity-related traits. Endocr J 2017;64:357–62. 10. Singh A, Babyak MA, Nolan DK, Brummett BH, Jiang R, Siegler IC, Kraus WE, Shah SH, Williams RB, Hauser ER. Gene by stress genome-wide interaction analysis and path analysis identify EBF1 as a cardiovascular and metabolic risk gene. Eur J Hum Genet 2015;23:854–62. 11. Alcantara C, Patel SR, Carnethon M, Castaneda S, Isasi CR, Davis S, Ramos A, Arredondo E, Redline S, Zee PC, Gallo LC. Stress and sleep: results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos Sociocultural Ancillary Study. SSM Popul Health 2017;3:713–21. 12. McCurley JL, Mills PJ, Roesch SC, Carnethon M, Giacinto RE, Isasi CR, Teng Y, Sotres-Alvarez D, Llabre MM, Penedo FJ, Schneiderman N, Gallo LC. Chronic stress, inflammation, and glucose regulation in U.S. Hispanics from the HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study. Psychophysiology 2015;52:1071–9. 13. Vasquez E, Strizich G, Gallo L, Marshall SJ, Merchant GC, Murillo R, Penedo FJ, Salazar C, Sotres-Alvarez D, Shaw BA, Isasi CR. The role of stress in understanding differences in sedentary behavior in Hispanic/Latino Adults: results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos Sociocultural Ancillary Study. J Phys Act Health 2016;13:310–7. 14. Gallo LC, Roesch SC, Fortmann AL, Carnethon MR, Penedo FJ, Perreira K, Birnbaum-Weitzman O, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Castaneda SF, Talavera GA, Sotres-Alvarez D, Daviglus ML, Schneiderman N, Isasi CR. Associations of chronic stress burden, perceived stress, and traumatic stress with cardiovascular disease prevalence and risk factors in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos Sociocultural Ancillary Study. Psychosom Med 2014;76:468–75. 15. Sorlie PD, Avilés-Santa LM, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Kaplan RC, Daviglus ML, Giachello AL, Schneiderman N, Raij L, Talavera G, Allison M, LaVange L, Chambless LE, Heiss G. Design and implementation of the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Ann Epidemiol 2010;20:629–41. 16. Lavange LM, Kalsbeek WD, Sorlie PD, Aviles-Santa LM, Kaplan RC, Barnhart J, Liu K, Giachello A, Lee DJ, Ryan J, Criqui MH, Elder JP. Sample design and cohort selection in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Ann Epidemiol 2010;20:642–9. 17. Conomos MP, Laurie CA, Stilp AM, Gogarten SM, McHugh CP, Nelson SC, Sofer T, Fernandez-Rhodes L, Justice AE, Graff M, Young KL, Seyerle AA, Avery CL, Taylor KD, Rotter JI, Talavera GA, Daviglus ML, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Schneiderman N, Heiss G, Kaplan RC, Franceschini N, Reiner AP, Shaffer JR, Barr RG, Kerr KF, Browning SR, Browning BL, Weir BS, Aviles-Santa ML, Papanicolaou GJ, Lumley T, Szpiro AA, North KE, Rice K, Thornton TA, Laurie CC. Genetic diversity and association studies in US Hispanic/Latino populations: applications in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Am J Hum Genet 2016;98:165–84. 18. NIH-NHLBI. The practical guide Identification, evaluation and treatment of oberweight and obesity in adults. Available at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/prctgd_c.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2022. 19. Vasquez PM, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Marquez DX, Argos M, Lamar M, Odoms-Young A, Gallo LC, Sotres-Alvarez D, Carrion VD, Perreira KM, Castaneda SF, Isasi CR, Talavera GA, Lash JP, Daviglus ML. Physical activity, stress, and cardiovascular disease risk: HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study. Prev Med Rep 2020;20:101190. 20. Munoz E, Gallo LC, Hua S, Sliwinski M, Kaplan R, Lipton RB, Gonzalez HM, Penedo FJ, Tarraf W, Daviglus ML, Llabre MM, Isasi CR. Stress is associated with neurocognitive function in Hispanic/Latino adults: results from HCHS/SOL Socio-Cultural Ancillary Study [published online March 14, 2021]. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2019. PubMed PMID: 31677388. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbz144. 21. Bromberger JT, Matthews KA. A longitudinal study of the effects of pessimism, trait anxiety, and life stress on depressive symptoms in middle-aged women. Psychol Aging 1996;11:207–13. 22. Choi SW, O’Reilly PF. PRSice-2: Polygenic Risk Score software for biobank-scale data. Gigascience 2019;8:giz082. 23. Yengo L, Sidorenko J, Kemper KE, Zheng Z, Wood AR, Weedon MN, Frayling TM, Hirschhorn J, Yang J, Visscher PM; GIANT Consortium. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for height and body mass index in ∼700000 individuals of European ancestry. Hum Mol Genet 2018;27:3641–9. 24. Elgart M, Lyons G, Romero-Brufau S, Kurniansyah N, Brody JA, Guo X, Lin HJ, Raffield L, Gao Y, Chen H, de Vries P, Lloyd-Jones DM, Lange LA, Peloso GM, Fornage M, Rotter JI, Rich SS, Morrison AC, Psaty BM, Levy D, Redline S, Sofer T; the NHLBI’s Trans-Omics in Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium. Polygenic risk prediction using gradient boosted trees captures non-linear genetic effects and allele interactions in complex phenotypes [published online July 16, 2021]. MedRxiv 2021. doi: 10.1101/2021.07.09.21260288. 25. Qi Q, Strizich G, Merchant G, Sotres-Alvarez D, Buelna C, Castañeda SF, Gallo LC, Cai J, Gellman MD, Isasi CR, Moncrieft AE, Sanchez-Johnsen L, Schneiderman N, Kaplan RC. Objectively measured sedentary time and cardiometabolic biomarkers in US Hispanic/Latino adults: the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). Circulation 2015;132:1560–9. 26. Evenson KR, Sotres-Alvarez D, Deng Y, Marshall SJ, Isasi CR, Esliger DW, Davis S. Accelerometer adherence and performance in a cohort study of US Hispanic adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015;47:725–34. 27. Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews CE, Buchowski MS. Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:357–64. 28. R. Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed March 30, 2022. 29. Zhao W, Ware EB, He Z, Kardia SLR, Faul JD, Smith JA. Interaction between social/psychosocial factors and genetic variants on body mass index: a gene-environment interaction analysis in a longitudinal setting. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14:1153. 30. Tyrrell J, Wood AR, Ames RM, Yaghootkar H, Beaumont RN, Jones SE, Tuke MA, Ruth KS, Freathy RM, Davey Smith G, Joost S, Guessous I, Murray A, Strachan DP, Kutalik Z, Weedon MN, Frayling TM. Gene-obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:559–75. 31. Calvin CM, Hagenaars SP, Gallacher J, Harris SE, Davies G, Liewald DC, Gale CR, Deary IJ. Sex-specific moderation by lifestyle and psychosocial factors on the genetic contributions to adiposity in 112,151 individuals from UK Biobank. Sci Rep 2019;9:363. 32. Nettleton JA, Follis JL, Ngwa JS, Smith CE, Ahmad S, Tanaka T, et al. Gene x dietary pattern interactions in obesity: analysis of up to 68 317 adults of European ancestry. Hum Mol Genet 2015;24:4728–38. 33. Rask-Andersen M, Karlsson T, Ek WE, Johansson A. Gene-environment interaction study for BMI reveals interactions between genetic factors and physical activity, alcohol consumption and

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif