Optimization of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Early-Stage Triple-Negative and HER2 + Breast Cancer

G Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative. Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(1):27–39.

Article  Google Scholar 

Xia L-Y, Hu Q-L, Zhang J, Xu W-Y, Li X-S. Survival outcomes of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 36,480 cases. World J Surgical Oncol. 2020;18(1):129.

Article  Google Scholar 

Symmans WF, Wei C, Gould R, et al. Long-term prognostic risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy associated with residual cancer burden and breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2017;35(10):1049–60.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Yau C, Osdoit M, van der Noordaa M, et al. Residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer: a multicentre pooled analysis of 5161 patients. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(1):149–60.

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Symmans WF, Yau C, Chen Y-Y, et al. Assessment of residual cancer burden and event-free survival in neoadjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: an analysis of data from the I-SPY2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(11):1654–63.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Hamy AS, Darrigues L, Laas E, et al. Prognostic value of the Residual Cancer Burden index according to breast cancer subtype: validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0234191.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Spring LM, Fell G, Arfe A, et al. Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and survival: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Cancer Res: Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2020;26(12):2838–48.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. The Lancet. 2014;384(9938):164–72.

Article  Google Scholar 

Woeste MR, Bhutiani N, Donaldson M, McMasters KM, Ajkay N. Evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical outcomes after breast conserving surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2021;123(2):439–45.

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(10):927–33.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318(10):918–26.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(7):609–18.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Classe JM, Loaec C, Gimbergues P, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and safe for selected patients: the GANEA 2 study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(2):343–52.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Boileau JF, Poirier B, Basik M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC study. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2015;33(3):258–64.

Article  Google Scholar 

Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1455–61.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Brackstone M, Baldassarre FG, Perera FE, et al. Management of the axilla in early-stage breast cancer: Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) and ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(27):3056–82.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Rauch GM, Adrada BE, Kuerer HM, van la Parra RFD, Leung JWT, Yang WT. Multimodality imaging for evaluating response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 2016;208(2):290–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, et al. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003;21(8):1431–9.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Yu K-D, Ye F-G, He M, et al. Effect of adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin on survival in women with triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(9):1390–6.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Blum JL, Flynn PJ, Yothers G, et al. Anthracyclines in early breast cancer: The ABC Trials—USOR 06–090, NSABP B-46-I/USOR 07132, and NSABP B-49 (NRG Oncology). J ClinOncol. 2017;35(23):2647–2655. This clinical trial examined an anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimen compared with a non-anthracycline regimen. Exploratory analyses suggested a small benefit of anthracyclines in patients with node-negative early-stage TNBC and a larger benefit in those with node-positive TNBC.

Alba E, Chacon JI, Lluch A, et al. A randomized phase II trial of platinum salts in basal-like breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant setting. Results from the GEICAM/2006–03, multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(2):487–93.

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Loibl S, O’Shaughnessy J, Untch M, et al. Addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BrighTNess): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(4):497–509.

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Schneeweiss A, Möbus V, Tesch H, et al. Intense dose-dense epirubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide versus weekly paclitaxel, liposomal doxorubicin (plus carboplatin in triple-negative breast cancer) for neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk early breast cancer (GeparOcto-GBG 84): a randomised phase III trial. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2019;106:181–92.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Shepherd JH, Ballman K, Polley MC, et al. CALGB 40603 (Alliance): long-term outcomes and genomic correlates of response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without carboplatin and bevacizumab in triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2022;Jco2101506.

Ando M, Yamauchi H, Aogi K, et al. Randomized phase II study of weekly paclitaxel with and without carboplatin followed by cyclophosphamide/epirubicin/5-fluorouracil as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/IIIA breast cancer without HER2 overexpression. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;145(2):401–9.

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang P, Yin Y, Mo H, et al. Better pathologic complete response and relapse-free survival after carboplatin plus paclitaxel compared with epirubicin plus paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial. Oncotarget. 2016;7(37):60647–56.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Gluz O, Nitz U, Liedtke C, et al. Comparison of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel+carboplatin vs nab-paclitaxel+gemcitabine in triple-negative breast cancer: randomized WSG-ADAPT-TN Trial results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(6):628–37.

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Untch M, Schneeweiss A, Salat C, et al. Long-term survival analysis of the randomized phase II trial investigating the addition of carboplatin to neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto). Ann Oncol. 2017;28:v49.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sharma P, Kimler BF, O’Dea A, et al. Randomized phase II trial of anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant carboplatin chemotherapy regimens in stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer (NeoSTOP). Clin Cancer Res: Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2021;27(4):975–82.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang L, Wu ZY, Li J, et al. Neoadjuvant docetaxel plus carboplatin vs epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel in triple-negative, early-stage breast cancer (NeoCART): results from a multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label phase II trial. Int J Cancer. 2022;150(4):654–62.

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S, et al. Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):747–56.

Article  Google Scholar 

Geyer CE, Sikov WM, Huober J, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of addition of carboplatin with or without veliparib to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: 4-year follow-up data from BrighTNess, a randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(4):384–94.

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, et al. Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(9):810–21.

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Schmid P CJ, Dent R, et al. KEYNOTE-522: Phase 3 study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy, followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. ESMO Virtual Plenary Abstract VP7–2021. Presented July 15, 2021.This clinical trial established a new standard of care for high-risk TNBC, confirming that pembrolizumab increased the chance of pCR in combination with chemotherapy and resulted in improvement in EFS. This regimen is now standard of care in this population.

Mittendorf EA, Zhang H, Barrios CH, et al. Neoadjuvant atezolizumab in combination with sequential nab-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy versus placebo and chemotherapy in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion031): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10257):1090–100.

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Loibl S, Untch M, Burchardi N, et al. A randomised phase II study investigating durvalumab in addition to an anthracycline taxane-based neoadjuvant therapy in early triple-negative breast cancer: clinical results and biomarker analysis of GeparNuevo study. Ann Oncol: Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2019;30(8):1279–88.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Loibl S, Schneeweiss A, Huober JB, et al. Durvalumab improves long-term outcome in TNBC: results from the phase II randomized GeparNUEVO study investigating neodjuvant durvalumab in addition to an anthracycline/taxane based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15_suppl):506.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gianni L, Huang CS, Egle D, et al. Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant treatment with or without atezolizumab in triple-negative, early high-risk and locally advanced breast cancer: NeoTRIP Michelangelo randomized study. Annals Oncol: Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2022.

Mayer IA, Zhao F, Arteaga CL, et al. Randomized phase III postoperative trial of platinum-based chemotherapy versus capecitabine in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: ECOG-ACRIN EA1131. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(23):2539–51.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Kaufman B, et al. Adjuvant olaparib for patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated breast cancer. New England J Med. 2021;384(25):2394–2405. This clinical trial showed that in patients with a BRCA 1 or 2 mutation and HER2-negative, high-risk early-stage breast cancer, olaparib improves OS compared to placebo and is now standard of care for these patients.

Abstract VP1-2022: Pre-specified event driven analysis of Overall Survival (OS) in the OlympiA phase III trial of adjuvant olaparib (OL) in germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) associated breast cancer. March 16, 2022.ESMO Virtual Plenary.

Demaria S, Volm MD, Shapiro RL, et al. Development of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer after neoadjuvant paclitaxel chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res: Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2001;7(10):3025–30.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif