Genomic Risk Scores and Oral Contraceptive-Associated Ischemic Stroke Risk

Abstract

Abstract Background: Oral contraceptives (OCs) are generally safe but vascular risk factors increase OC-associated ischemic stroke risk. We performed a case-control study to evaluate whether a genomic risk score for ischemic stroke modifies OC-associated ischemic stroke risk. Methods: The Genetics of Early-Onset Stroke (GEOS) study includes 340 premenopausal women (143 ischemic stroke cases and 197 controls) with data on OC use within 30 days before the index event (for cases) or interview (for controls). Using a previously validated genetic risk score (metaGRS) for ischemic stroke based on 19 polygenic risk scores of vascular events and risk factors, we stratified our sample into tertiles of genomic risk. We evaluated the association between OC use and ischemic stroke within each tertile. We tested if the association between OC use and ischemic stroke depended on the genomic risk of stroke using logistic regression with an OC use x metaGRS interaction term. Results: Among all women, OC use was significantly associated with ischemic stroke (odds ratio = 2.4, p = 0.002). The odds ratio for ischemic stroke associated with OC use increased from 1.5 in the tertile with the lowest genomic risk to 3.9 in the tertile with the highest genomic risk of ischemic stroke. The formal test of interaction was consistent with our hypothesis (p = 0.07) that the genomic risk score modifies the association of OC use with ischemic stroke. Conclusions: Our results suggest that genomic profile modifies the OC-associated ischemic stroke risk. Larger studies are warranted to determine whether a genomic risk score could be clinically useful in reducing OC-associated ischemic stroke.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The study is supported by NIH R01NS086905, R01NS100178, R01NS105150 was also supported with resources and the use of facilities at the VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland. The contents do not represent the views of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

University of Maryland at Baltimore Institutional Review Board

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The aggregated data that support the findings are available by corresponding author upon reasonable request.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif