McGrory BJ, Etkin CD, Lewallen DG (2016) Comparing contemporary revision burden among hip and knee joint replacement registries. Arthroplast Today 2:83–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.04.003

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL (2020) Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 35:S79–S85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nichols CI, Vose JG (2016) Clinical outcomes and costs within 90 days of primary or revision total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31:1400-1406.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.022

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goodman GP, Engh CA Jr (2016) The custom triflange cup. Bone Joint J 98-B:68–72. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B.36354

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tikhilov RM, Shubnyakov II, Denisov AO (2019) Classifications of acetabular defects: do they provide an objective evidence for complexity of revision hip joint arthroplasty? (Critical literature review and own cases). Traumatol Orthop Russ 25:122–141. https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-1-122-141

Article  Google Scholar 

Moon J-K, Ryu J, Kim Y, Yang JH, Hwang KT, Kim YH (2019) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using press-fitted jumbo cups: an average 10-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(8):1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03214-7

Ibrahim MS, Raja S, Haddad FS (2013) Acetabular impaction bone grafting in total hip replacement. Bone Joint J 95-B:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32834

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pierannunzii L, Zagra L (2016) Bone grafts, bone graft extenders, substitutes and enhancers for acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 1:431–439. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.160025

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bozic KJ, Freiberg AA, Harris WH (2004) The high hip center. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:101–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200403000-00014

Article  Google Scholar 

Fickert S, Pfeiffer S, Walter A et al (2010) Azetabuläre revisions operationen mit der längsovalen revisionspfanne. (Article in German). Orthopade 39:503–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-009-1527-2

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moskal JT, Higgins ME, Shen J (2008) Type iii acetabular defect revision with bilobed components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:691–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0079-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Marx A, Beier A, Richter A et al (2016) Major acetabular defects treated with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusion cage and impaction bone allograft in a large series: a 5- to 7- year follow-up study. HIP Int 26:585–590. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000388

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park K-S, Seon J-K, Lee K-B et al (2017) Revision total hip arthroplasty using an acetabular reinforcement ring with a hook: a precise follow-up, at average 11.4 years, of a previous report. J Arthroplasty 32:503–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.010

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Löchel J, Janz V, Hipfl C et al (2019) Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up. Bone Joint J 101-B:311–316. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B3.BJJ-2018-0959.R1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang C, Huang Z, Wu B et al (2020) Cup-cage solution for massive acetabular defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Surg 12:701–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12710

CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tikhilov RM, Dzhavadov AA, Kovalenko AN et al (2022) Standard versus custom-made acetabular implants in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 37:119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.003

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-X

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A et al (2001) Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 19:50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(00)00021-8

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78-B:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.78B2.0780185

Article  Google Scholar 

Moore MS, McAuley JP, Young AM, Engh CA (2006) Radiographic signs of osseointegration in porous-coated acetabular components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:176–183. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000201149.14078.50

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abolghasemian M, Tangsataporn S, Sternheim A et al (2013) Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss. Bone Joint J 95-B:166–172. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30608

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Massin P, Schmidt L, Engh CA (1989) Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. An experimental study J Arthroplasty 4:245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(89)80020-8

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 20–32

Pierchon F, Migaud H, Duquennoy A, Fontaine C (1993) Evaluation radiologique du centre de rotation de la hanche Radiologic evaluation of the rotation center of the hip French. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 79:281–284

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST : Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis past : paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis even a cursory glance at the recent paleontological literature should convince anyone tha. Palaeontol Electron 4:1–9

Google Scholar 

Jenkins DR, Odland AN, Sierra RJ et al (2017) Minimum five-year outcomes with porous tantalum acetabular cup and augment construct in complex revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 99:e49. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00125

Article  Google Scholar 

Cassar-Gheiti AJ, Mei XY, Afenu EA et al (2021) Midterm outcomes after reconstruction of superolateral acetabular defects using flying buttress porous tantalum augments during revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 36:2936–2941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.040

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Korytkin AA, Novikova YS, Kovaldov KA et al (2019) Mid-term outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty with acetabular augments. Traumatol Orthop Russ 25:9–18. https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-1-9-18

Article  Google Scholar 

Whitehouse MR, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS (2015) Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:521–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3861-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rukin YA, Lychagin AV, Murylev VY et al (2020) Hip arthroplasty in patients with hip dysplasia by individual augments: early results. Traumatol Orthop Russ 26:50–59. https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2020-26-2-50-59

Article  Google Scholar 

Sporer SM, Della VC (2010) Porous metal augments: big hopes for big holes. Orthopedics 33:01477447-20100722–1477529. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20100722-29

Article  Google Scholar 

Abolghasemian M, Tangsataporn S, Sternheim A et al (2013) Porous metal augments. Bone Joint J 95:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B.32907

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA et al (1999) Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Jt Surg 81:907–914. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.9283

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Bobyn JD, Poggie RA, Krygier JJ et al (2004) Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Jt Surg 86:123–129. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200412002-00017

Article  Google Scholar 

Wetters NG, Murray TG, Moric M et al (2013) Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:410–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2561-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Martino I, D’Apolito R, Soranoglou VG et al (2017) Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components. Bone Joint J 99-B:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0398.R1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar