Assessment tools and incidence of hospital-associated disability: a rapid systematic review

Abstract

Background During hospitalization older people have a high risk of developing functional impairments unrelated to the reasons for their admission. This is termed hospital associated disability. The aims of this systematic review were to assess the incidence of hospital associated disability among older patients admitted to acute care, to identify the tools used to assess activities of daily living in these patients, and to evaluate which functional task is most sensitive for detecting changes in disability among older hospitalized patients. Methods A rapid systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group and the PRISMA statement. A literature search was performed in Medline (via Ovid), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases on 26 August 2021. Inclusion criteria: older people (equal or more than 65 years), assessment of activities of daily living at baseline and discharge. Exclusion criterion: diseases affecting functional decline. Results Eleven studies were included in the final review. Incidence of hospital-associated disability (overall score) was 37% (95% CI 0.31, 0.42). Insufficient data prevented meta analysis of the individual items. The most sensitive measure for detecting changes in disability was the overall score of assessment of activities of daily living. Conclusions Incidence of hospital-associated disability in older patients might be overestimated, due to the combination of disease-related disability and hospital associated disability. The tools used to assess these patients presented some limitations. These results should be interpreted with caution, as a limited number of studies reported adequate information to assess the incidence of hospital associated disability. Risk of bias in the included studies raised some concerns. Keywords Functional decline, hospitalization; activities of daily living; older patients

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

https://osf.io/9jez4/, identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/9JEZ4.

Clinical Protocols

https://osf.io/9jez4/

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The protocol of this rapid systematic review was registered at OSF registries (https://osf.io/9jez4/) identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/9JEZ4. All the results of this rapid systematic review are available on the paper.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif