Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening (2012) The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 380:1778–1786

Bleyer A, Welch HG (2012) Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 367:1998–2005

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Drukteinis JS, Mooney BP, Flowers CI, Gatenby RA (2013) Beyond mammography: new frontiers in breast cancer screening. Am J Med 126:472–479

Article  Google Scholar 

Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Lehman CD (2006) Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1475–1482

Article  Google Scholar 

Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ (2006) Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1483–1491

Article  Google Scholar 

Henriksen EL, Carlsen JF, Vejborg IM, Nielsen MB, Lauridsen CA (2019) The efficacy of using computer-aided detection (CAD) for detection of breast cancer in mammography screening: a systematic review. Acta Radiol 60:13–18

Article  Google Scholar 

Salim M, Wåhlin E, Dembrower K et al (2020) External evaluation of 3 commercial artificial intelligence algorithms for independent assessment of screening mammograms. JAMA Oncol 6:1581–1588

Article  Google Scholar 

Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Lång K, Gubern-Merida A et al (2019) Stand-alone artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: comparison with 101 radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst 111:916–922

Article  Google Scholar 

McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V et al (2020) International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature 577:89–94

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Morgan MP, Cooke MM, McCarthy GM (2005) Microcalcifications associated with breast cancer: an epiphenomenon or biologically significant feature of selected tumors? J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 10:181–187

Article  Google Scholar 

Lee AY, Wisner DJ, Aminololama-Shakeri S et al (2017) Inter-reader variability in the use of BI-RADS descriptors for suspicious findings on diagnostic mammography: a multi-institution study of 10 academic radiologists. Acad Radiol 24:60–66

Article  Google Scholar 

Bent CK, Bassett LW, D'Orsi CJ, Sayre JW (2010) The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1378–1383

Article  Google Scholar 

Berg WA, Arnoldus CL, Teferra E, Bhargavan M (2001) Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 221:495–503

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Liu H, Chen Y, Zhang Y et al (2021) A deep learning model integrating mammography and clinical factors facilitates the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in breast cancer screening. Eur Radiol 31:5902–5912

Article  Google Scholar 

Wang J, Yang X, Cai H, Tan W, Jin C, Li L (2016) Discrimination of breast cancer with microcalcifications on mammography by deep learning. Sci Rep 6:27327

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

American College of Radiology (2013) ACR BI-RADS atlas: breast imaging reporting and data system, 5th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston

Kim HE, Kim HH, Han BK et al (2020) Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study. Lancet Digit Health 2:e138–e148

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim SY, Kim HY, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Yoon JH (2015) Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Ann Surg Oncol 22:2895–2901

Article  Google Scholar 

Choi WJ, Han K, Shin HJ, Lee J, Kim EK, Yoon JH (2021) Calcifications with suspicious morphology at mammography: should they all be considered with the same clinical significance? Eur Radiol 31:2529–2538

Article  Google Scholar 

Leisenring W, Pepe MS, Longton G (1997) A marginal regression modelling framework for evaluating medical diagnostic tests. Stat Med 16:1263–1281

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Lehman CD, Arao RF, Sprague BL et al (2017) National performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography: update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Radiology 283:49–58

Article  Google Scholar 

Neal CH, Coletti MC, Joe A, Jeffries DO, Helvie MA (2013) Does digital mammography increase detection of high-risk breast lesions presenting as calcifications? AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:1148–1154

Article  Google Scholar