DNA-Damage-Repair Gene Alterations in Genitourinary Malignancies

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply

Select

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Review

Received: March 21, 2022
Accepted: August 03, 2022
Published online: August 09, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0014-312X (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9921 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ESR

Abstract

Background: High-fidelity repair of DNA damage repair (DDR) (either single-strand- [SSBs] or double-strand breaks [DSBs]) is necessary for maintaining genomic integrity and cell survival. DDR alterations are commonly found in genitourinary malignancies involving either DSB repair by the homologous recombination (HR) repair (HRR) system (BRCA1/2 pathway) or the SSB repair through the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) pathway. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) exploit defects in the DNA repair pathway through synthetic lethality, DSBs being repaired only in HR-proficient cells but not in HR-deficient (HRD) cells. Summary: A growing body of evidence supports the need for identification of germinal and somatic DDR alterations in patients with genitourinary malignancies. PARPi have already shown significant survival benefits in patients harboring HRR mutations in advanced settings, paving the way for precision medicine. Key Messages: In advanced prostate cancer (PCa), somatic mutations in HRR pathway are observed in up to 27% of metastatic resistant-to-castration PCa (mCRPC), although occurring early in PCa development, and mainly involving BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2, and BRCA1. Overall, germinal alterations are present in roughly 30–50% of cases of HRR alterations, and relative risk of PCa in germinal BRCA2 alteration carriers is 4.65-fold higher compared to noncarriers. Determination of DDR gene status is recommended in metastatic patients, a fortiori in mCRPC setting, since it could be a putative biomarker of response to first line of treatment (androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors [ARSI] vs. taxane-based chemotherapy) and allows to assess eligibility for PARPi use. Thus, olaparib (combined with androgen deprivation therapy) recently improved overall survival in mCRPC HRD patients, after new hormonal therapy (NHT) and led to its approvement for patients with an alteration in 14 of 15 prespecified HRR genes. Moreover, since preclinical data suggested synergic action between PARPi and ARSI, the use of either olaparib or niraparib has also been proposed in combination with NHT, with a radiological progression-free survival improvement when used with abiraterone. In urothelial carcinoma, a DDR gene alteration is identified in 23–54% of patients mostly in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, with a strong association between DDR gene mutation and a higher tumor mutation burden and sensitivity to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Recent phase 2 trials supported the use of HRR status to select patients for PARPi treatment in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Finally, in renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), pathogenic germline variants in DDR genes were identified in 7.3% of the cases, and deleterious somatic alterations have also been described as recurrent genomic events in patients with advanced RCC.

© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel

References Helleday T, Eshtad S, Nik-Zainal S. Mechanisms underlying mutational signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Genet. 2014 Sep;15(9):585–98. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Molecular Cell. 2010 Oct;40(2):179–204. Karl LA, Peritore M, Galanti L, Pfander B. DNA double strand break repair and its control by nucleosome remodeling. Front Genet. 2021;12:821543. Stolz A, Ertych N, Bastians H. Tumor suppressor CHK2: regulator of DNA damage response and mediator of chromosomal stability. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Feb;17(3):401–5. Zhang J, Willers H, Feng Z, Ghosh JC, Kim S, Weaver DT, et al. Chk2 phosphorylation of BRCA1 regulates DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Jan;24(2):708–18. Zhang F, Fan Q, Ren K, Andreassen PR. PALB2 functionally connects the breast cancer susceptibility proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2. Mol Cancer Res. 2009 Jul;7(7):1110–8. Schiewer MJ, Goodwin JF, Han S, Brenner JC, Augello MA, Dean JL, et al. Dual roles of PARP-1 promote cancer growth and progression. Cancer Discov. 2012 Dec;2(12):1134–49. Boussios S, Abson C, Moschetta M, Rassy E, Karathanasi A, Bhat T, et al. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: talazoparib in ovarian cancer and beyond. Drugs R D. 2020 Jun;20(2):55–73. Teyssonneau D, Margot H, Cabart M, Anonnay M, Sargos P, Vuong N-S, et al. Prostate cancer and PARP inhibitors: progress and challenges. J Hematol Oncol. 2021 Mar;14(1):51. Castro E, Goh C, Olmos D, Saunders E, Leongamornlert D, Tymrakiewicz M, et al. Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 May;31(14):1748–57. Kote-Jarai Z, Leongamornlert D, Saunders E, Tymrakiewicz M, Castro E, Mahmud N, et al. BRCA2 is a moderate penetrance gene contributing to young-onset prostate cancer: implications for genetic testing in prostate cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2011 Oct;105(8):1230–4. Sinclair CS, Berry R, Schaid D, Thibodeau SN, Couch FJ. BRCA1 and BRCA2 have a limited role in familial prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2000 Mar;60(5):1371–5. Robinson D, Van Allen EM, Wu Y-M, Schultz N, Lonigro RJ, Mosquera J-M, et al. Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell. 2015 May;162(2):454–28. Abida W, Armenia J, Gopalan A, Brennan R, Walsh M, Barron D, et al. Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017(1):1–16. Pritchard CC, Mateo J, Walsh MF, De Sarkar N, Abida W, Beltran H, et al. Inherited DNA-repair gene mutations in men with metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug;375(5):443–53. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Aug;91(15):1310–6. Castro E, Romero-Laorden N, Del Pozo A, Lozano R, Medina A, Puente J, et al. PROREPAIR-B: a prospective cohort study of the impact of germline DNA repair mutations on the outcomes of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb;37(6):490–503. Na R, Zheng SL, Han M, Yu H, Jiang D, Shah S, et al. Germline mutations in ATM and BRCA1/2 distinguish risk for lethal and indolent prostate cancer and are associated with early age at death. Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):740–7. Nyberg T, Frost D, Barrowdale D, Evans DG, Bancroft E, Adlard J, et al. Prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):24–35. Rozet F, Mongiat-Artus P, Hennequin C, Beauval JB, Beuzeboc P, Cormier L, et al. [French ccAFU guidelines: update 2020-2022: prostate cancer]. Prog Urol. 2020 Nov;30(12S):S136–251. Page EC, Bancroft EK, Brook MN, Assel M, Hassan Al Battat M, Thomas S, et al. Interim results from the IMPACT study: evidence for prostate-specific antigen screening in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Eur Urol. 2019 Dec;76(6):831–42. Li S, Silvestri V, Leslie G, Rebbeck TR, Neuhausen SL, Hopper JL, et al. Cancer risks associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan:JCO2102112. Castro E, Goh C, Leongamornlert D, Saunders E, Tymrakiewicz M, Dadaev T, et al. Effect of BRCA mutations on metastatic relapse and cause-specific survival after radical treatment for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):186–93. Carter HB, Helfand B, Mamawala M, Wu Y, Landis P, Yu H, et al. Germline mutations in ATM and BRCA1/2 are associated with grade reclassification in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):743–9. Mateo J, Seed G, Bertan C, Rescigno P, Dolling D, Figueiredo I, et al. Genomics of lethal prostate cancer at diagnosis and castration resistance. J Clin Invest. 2020 Apr;130(4):1743–51. Schweizer MT, Sivakumar S, Tukachinsky H, Coleman I, De Sarkar N, Yu EY, et al. Concordance of DNA repair gene mutations in paired primary prostate cancer samples and metastatic tissue or cell-free DNA. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun;7(9):1378–5. Parker C, Castro E, Fizazi K, Heidenreich A, Ost P, Procopio G, et al. Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020 Sep;31(9):1119–34. Antonarakis ES, Lu C, Luber B, Liang C, Wang H, Chen Y, et al. Germline DNA-repair gene mutations and outcomes in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving first-line abiraterone and enzalutamide. Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):218–25. Annala M, Struss WJ, Warner EW, Beja K, Vandekerkhove G, Wong A, et al. Treatment outcomes and tumor loss of heterozygosity in germline DNA repair-deficient prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2017 Jul;72(1):34–42. Hussain M, Mateo J, Fizazi K, Saad F, Shore N, Sandhu S, et al. Survival with olaparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec;383(24):2345–57. Mateo J, Carreira S, Sandhu S, Miranda S, Mossop H, Perez-Lopez R, et al. DNA-repair defects and olaparib in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct;373(18):1697–708. Mateo J, Porta N, Bianchini D, McGovern U, Elliott T, Jones R, et al. Olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations (TOPARP-B): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):162–74. de Bono J, Mateo J, Fizazi K, Saad F, Shore N, Sandhu S, et al. Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. New Engl J Med. 2020 May;382(22):2091–102. Abida W, Patnaik A, Campbell D, Shapiro J, Bryce AH, McDermott R, et al. Rucaparib in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harboring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene alteration. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov;38(32):3763–72. Smith MR, Scher HI, Sandhu S, Efstathiou E, Lara PN, Yu EY, et al. Niraparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and DNA repair gene defects (GALAHAD): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Feb;23(3):362–73. de Bono JS, Mehra N, Scagliotti GV, Castro E, Dorff T, Stirling A, et al. Talazoparib monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair alterations (TALAPRO-1): an open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1250–64. Li L, Karanika S, Yang G, Wang J, Park S, Broom BM, et al. Androgen receptor inhibitor-induced “BRCAness” and PARP inhibition are synthetically lethal for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Sci Signal. 2017 May;10(480):eaam7479. Clarke N, Wiechno P, Alekseev B, Sala N, Jones R, Kocak I, et al. Olaparib combined with abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):975–86. Clarke NW, Armstrong AJ, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Oya M, Shore N, Loredo E, et al. Abiraterone and olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. NEJM Evid. 2022 Jun 3. Chabanon RM, Muirhead G, Krastev DB, Adam J, Morel D, Garrido M, et al. PARP inhibition enhances tumor cell-intrinsic immunity in ERCC1-deficient non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Invest. 2019 Mar;129(3):1211–28. Nassar AH, Umeton R, Kim J, Lundgren K, Harshman L, Van Allen EM, et al. Mutational analysis of 472 urothelial carcinoma across grades and anatomic sites. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Apr;25(8):2458–70. Yang K, Yu W, Liu H, Ding F, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Comparison of genomic characterization in upper tract urothelial carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Oncologist. 2021 Aug;26(8):e1395–405. Tan KT, Yeh C-N, Chang Y-C, Cheng J-H, Fang W-L, Yeh Y-C, et al. PRKDC: new biomarker and drug target for checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Mar;8(1):e000485. Teo MY, Bambury RM, Zabor EC, Jordan E, Al-Ahmadie H, Boyd ME, et al. DNA damage response and repair gene alterations are associated with improved survival in patients with platinum-treated advanced urothelial carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul;23(14):3610–8. Teo MY, Seier K, Ostrovnaya I, Regazzi AM, Kania BE, Moran MM, et al. Alterations in DNA damage response and repair genes as potential marker of clinical benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in advanced urothelial cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun;36(17):1685–94. Höhn A, Krüger K, Skowron MA, Bormann S, Schumacher L, Schulz WA, et al. Distinct mechanisms contribute to acquired cisplatin resistance of urothelial carcinoma cells. Oncotarget. 2016 Jul;7(27):41320–35. Powles T, Park SH, Voog E, Caserta C, Valderrama BP, Gurney H, et al. Avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep;383(13):1218–30. Powles T, Sridhar SS, Loriot Y, Bellmunt J, Mu XJ, Ching KA, et al. Avelumab maintenance in advanced urothelial carcinoma: biomarker analysis of the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial. Nat Med. 2021 Dec;27(12):2200–11. Nassar AH, Abou Alaiwi S, AlDubayan SH, Moore N, Mouw KW, Kwiatkowski DJ, et al. Prevalence of pathogenic germline cancer risk variants in high-risk urothelial carcinoma. Genet Med. 2020;22(4):709–18. Vosoughi A, Zhang T, Shohdy KS, Vlachostergios PJ, Wilkes DC, Bhinder B, et al. Common germline-somatic variant interactions in advanced urothelial cancer. Nat Commun. 2020 Dec;11(1):6195. Truong H, Sheikh R, Kotecha R, Kemel Y, Reisz PA, Lenis AT, et al. Germline variants identified in patients with early-onset renal cell carcinoma referred for germline genetic testing. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):993–1000. Ged Y, Chaim JL, DiNatale RG, Knezevic A, Kotecha RR, Carlo MI, et al. DNA damage repair pathway alterations in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma and implications on systemic therapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Jun;8(1):e000230. Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Review

Received: March 21, 2022
Accepted: August 03, 2022
Published online: August 09, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0014-312X (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9921 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ESR

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif