Statistical Evaluation of the Test Threshold for the Alzheimer's Disease EEG Coherence Marker

Abstract

A progressive reduction in synaptic connections between neurons is one neurophysiological indicator of brain ageing and was linked to the severity of dementia. In our study, we hypothesized that if synaptic disconnection as the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is responsible for the brain's inability to integrate diverse regions into efficient networks, then electroencephalographic data may be utilized to identify Alzheimer's dementia. The study explored EEG coherence, reflecting connectivity between regions, as a potential AD indicator and identified four promising EEG coherence markers. As the pattern of degeneration follows the temporal-parietal-frontal axis, the temporal gamma marker was chosen for further evaluation. We utilize conventional analysis, producing paired results such as sensitivity and specificity and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the accuracy of the temporal gamma marker. The optimal cut-off point of 0.950 was confirmed by both methods and provided 95% correct classification indicating an almost perfect differentiation between control and impaired cognitive status. This evaluation will be used in a blinded diagnostic test accuracy study to determine the TG_marker validity in detecting AD and excluding pseudo-dementias.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Research Ethics Office of the University of Alberta, Canada, reviewed and approved this study (HREBA.CHC-16-0053).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif