Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK (2006) Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1331–1334. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj362

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jayson M, Sanders H (1998) Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology 51:203–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00506-2

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berland LL et al (2010) Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 7:754–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.013

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al Harbi F, Tabatabaeefar L, Jewett MA et al (2016) Enhancement threshold of small (< 4 cm) solid renal masses on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:554–558. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.14806

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Birnbaum BA, Hindman N, Lee J, Babb JS (2007) Multi–detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Radiology 242:109–119. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2421052066

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Birnbaum BA, Maki DD, Chakraborty DP et al (2002) Renal cyst pseudoenhancement: evaluation with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Radiology 225:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2251010930

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goyal A, Sharma R, Bhalla AS, Gamanagatti S, Seth A (2018) Comparison of MDCT, MRI and MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluation of focal renal lesions: the defender, challenger, and winner! Indian J Radiol Imaging 28:27–36. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_40_17

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kwon T, Jeong IG, Yoo S et al (2015) Role of MRI in indeterminate renal mass: diagnostic accuracy and impact on clinical decision making. Int Urol Nephrol 47:585–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-0928-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA (2004) Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 231:365–371. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2312031025

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kreft BP, Müller-Miny H, Sommer T et al (1997) Diagnostic value of MR imaging in comparison to CT in the detection and differential diagnosis of renal masses: ROC analysis. Eur Radiol 7:542–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050200

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhong J, Cao F, Guan X, Chen J, Ding Z, Zhang M (2017) Renal cyst masses (Bosniak category II–III) may be over evaluated by the Bosniak criteria based on MR findings. Medicine (Baltimore) 96. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009361

Hendee WR, Becker GJ, Borgstede JP et al (2010) Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. Radiology 257:240–245. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100063

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Silverman SG, Pedrosa I, Ellis JH et al (2019) Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses, version 2019: an update proposal and needs assessment. Radiology 292:475–488. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182646

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mileto A, Marin D, Ramirez-Giraldo JC et al (2014) Accuracy of contrast-enhanced dual-energy MDCT for the assessment of iodine uptake in renal lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W466–W474. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11450

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mileto A, Allen BC, Pietryga JA et al (2017) Characterization of incidental renal mass with dual-energy CT: diagnostic accuracy of effective atomic number maps for discriminating nonenhancing cysts from enhancing masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209:W221–W230. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17325

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel BN, Bibbey A, Choudhury KR et al (2017) Characterization of small (< 4 cm) focal renal lesions: diagnostic accuracy of spectral analysis using single-phase contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209:815–825. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.17824

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaza RK, Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Platt JF (2011) Distinguishing enhancing from nonenhancing renal lesions with fast kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1375–1381. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.6812

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Graser A, Becker CR, Staehler M et al (2010) Single-phase dual-energy CT allows for characterization of renal masses as benign or malignant. Invest Radiol 45:399. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181e33189

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pourvaziri A, Parakh A, Mojtahed A et al (2019) Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT and subtraction CT for renal lesion detection and characterization. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06224-6

Atwi NE, Sabottke CF, Pitre DM et al (2020) Follow-up recommendation rates associated with spectral detector dual-energy CT of the abdomen and pelvis: a retrospective comparison to single-energy CT. J Am Coll Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.12.029

Walter SS, Schneeweiß S, Maurer M et al (2018) Virtual non-enhanced dual-energy CT reconstruction may replace true non-enhanced CT scans in the setting of suspected active hemorrhage. Eur J Radiol 109:218–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.10.026

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iglehart JK (2006) The new era of medical imaging — progress and pitfalls. N Engl J Med 354:2822–2828. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmhpr061219

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kanzaria HK, Hoffman JR, Probst MA et al (2015) Emergency physician perceptions of medically unnecessary advanced diagnostic imaging. Acad Emerg Med 22:390–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12625

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tung M, Sharma R, Hinson JS et al (2018) Factors associated with imaging overuse in the emergency department: a systematic review. Am J Emerg Med 36:301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.10.049

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kainberger F (2017) Defensive medicine and overutilization of imaging—an issue of radiation protection. Wien Klin Wochenschr 129:157–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-016-1089-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen J, Majercik S, Bledsoe J et al (2015) The prevalence and impact of defensive medicine in the radiographic workup of the trauma patient: a pilot study. Am J Surg 210:462–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.016

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Flohr TG, Mccollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2919-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ascenti G, Mileto A, Krauss B et al (2013) Distinguishing enhancing from nonenhancing renal masses with dual-source dual-energy CT: iodine quantification versus standard enhancement measurements. Eur Radiol 23:2288–2295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2811-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marin D, Davis D, Roy Choudhury K et al (2017) Characterization of small focal renal lesions: diagnostic accuracy with single-phase contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT with material attenuation analysis compared with conventional attenuation measurements. Radiology 284:737–747. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161872

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cha D, Kim CK, Park JJ, Park BK (2016) Evaluation of hyperdense renal lesions incidentally detected on single-phase post-contrast CT using dual-energy CT. Br J Radiol 89:20150860. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150860

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rajiah P, Rong R, Martinez-Rios C et al (2018) Benefit and clinical significance of retrospectively obtained spectral data with a novel detector-based spectral computed tomography - initial experiences and results. Clinic Imaging 49:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.10.019

Article  Google Scholar 

Kang SK, Kim D, Chandarana H (2011) Contemporary imaging of the renal mass. Curr Urol Rep 12:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-010-0148-y

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hecht EM, Israel GM, Krinsky GA et al (2004) Renal masses: quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging. Radiology 232:373–378. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2322031209

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar