Rare UT cancer lack adequate understanding of survival and therapeutic options.
•Multimodality therapeutic approach on rare UT cancer OS and CSS were compared.
•OS outperformed CSS in the locoregional stage.
•OS and CSS groups of the locoregional stage showed better survival after surgery.
AbstractNumerous rare urinary tract (UT) cancers lack adequate understanding of survival and therapeutic options, and nearly all responses to systemic therapy are unsatisfactory, yet clinical research is scarce.
MethodsBetween 2010 and 2015, a total of (14,622 patients) with uncommon UT cancer (62.5%) in the overall survival (OS) group and (37.5%) in the cancer specific survival (CSS)group were identified in the SEER database. multimodality therapeutic approach on OS and CSS were compared.
ResultsIn uncommon UT malignancies, OS outperformed CSS in the locoregional stage (P < 0.05), but not in the distant stage (P = 0.34). Non-performed surgery had poor survival in both OS (HR 1.647; 95% CI (1.461–1.856)) and CSS (HR 1.573; 95% CI (1.399–1.769)) respectively (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in survival in the CSS group between those who received or did not obtain chemotherapy.
ConclusionsThe OS group survives substantially longer than the CSS group in the locoregional stage, but not at the distant stage. While both the OS and CSS groups of the locoregional stage were linked with improved survival after surgery, chemotherapy treatment decreased OS but not CSS in patients with uncommon urological cancers. There were no differences in radiation between the OS and CSS.
KeywordsRare urinary cancer
Overall survival
Cancer-specific survival
Epidemiology
AbbreviationsCSSCancer-Specific Survival
SEERSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
PSMPropensity Score Matching Study
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
留言 (0)