Nongynecologic Cytopathology

Ikeda K.a· Sakabe N.a· Maruyama S.a· Ito C.a· Shimoyama Y.a· Sato S.b· Nagata K.a

Author affiliations

aPathophysiology Sciences, Department of Integrated Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
bClinical Engineering, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Juntendo University, Urayasu, Japan

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply

Select

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Received: April 25, 2022
Accepted: July 10, 2022
Published online: September 06, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 4
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0001-5547 (Print)
eISSN: 1938-2650 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ACY

Abstract

Introduction: Deep learning is a subset of machine learning that has contributed to significant changes in feature extraction and image classification and is being actively researched and developed in the field of cytopathology. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) enables standardized cytological preparation and is also applied to artificial intelligence (AI) research, but cytological features differ depending on the LBC preservative solution types. In this study, the relationship between cell detection by AI and the type of preservative solution used was examined. Methods: The specimens were prepared from five preservative solutions of LBC and stained using the Papanicolaou method. The YOLOv5 deep convolutional neural network algorithm was used to create a deep learning model for each specimen, and a BRCPT model from five specimens was also created. Each model was compared to the specimen types used for detection. Results: Among the six models, a difference in the detection rate of approximately 25% was observed depending on the detected specimen, and within specimens, a difference in the detection rate of approximately 20% was observed depending on the model. The BRCPT model had little variation in the detection rate depending on the type of the detected specimen. Conclusions: The same cells were treated with different preservative solutions, the cytologic features were different, and AI clarified the difference in cytologic features depending on the type of solution. The type of preservative solution used for training and detection had an extreme influence on cell detection using AI. Although the accuracy of the deep learning model is important, it is necessary to understand that cell morphology differs depending on the type of preservative solution, which is a factor affecting the detection rate of AI.

© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel

References Lew M, Wilbur DC, Pantanowitz L. Computational cytology: lessons learned from pap test computer-assisted screening. Acta Cytol. 2021 Jul;65(4):286–300. Ikenberg H. Computer-assisted diagnostics in cervical cytology [German]. Pathologe. 2011 Nov;32(6):476–83. McAlpine ED, Pantanowitz L, Michelow PM. Challenges developing deep learning algorithms in cytology. Acta Cytol. 2021 Jul;65(4):301–9. Landau MS, Pantanowitz L. Artificial intelligence in cytopathology: a review of the literature and overview of commercial landscape. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2019 Jul - Aug;8(4):230–41. Dey P. The emerging role of deep learning in cytology. Cytopathology. 2021 Mar;32(2):154–60. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015 May;521(7553):436–44. Choi RY, Coyner AS, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Chiang M, Campbell JP. Introduction to machine learning, neural networks, and deep learning. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Feb;9(2):14. Jubayer F, Soeb JA, Mojumder AN, Paul MK, Barua P, Kayshar S, et al. Detection of mold on the food surface using YOLOv5. Curr Res Food Sci. 2021 Oct;4:724–8. Luo Y, Zhang Y, Sun X, Dai H, Chen X. Intelligent solutions in chest abnormality detection based on YOLOv5 and ResNet50. J Healthc Eng. 2021 Oct;13;2021:2267635. Jocher G, Changyu L, Hogan A, Yu L, changyu98, Rai P, et al. Ultralytics/yolov5: initial release (2020). Fan Y, Zhang S, Feng K, Qian K, Wang Y, Qin S. Strawberry maturity recognition algorithm combining dark channel enhancement and YOLOv5. Sensors. 2022 Jan;22(2):419. Ahmed KR. Smart pothole detection using deep learning based on dilated convolution. Sensors. 2021 Dec;21(24):8406. Chiriboga M, Green CM, Hastman DA, Mathur D, Wei Q, Diaz SA, et al. Rapid DNA origami nanostructure detection and classification using the YOLOv5 deep convolutional neural network. Sci Rep. 2022 Mar;12(1):3871. Wan J, Chen B, Yu Y. Polyp detection from colorectum images by using attentive YOLOv5. Diagnostics. 2021 Dec;11(12):2264. Yap MH, Hachiuma R, Alavi A, Brüngel R, Cassidy B, Goyal M, et al. Deep learning in diabetic foot ulcers detection: a comprehensive evaluation. Comput Biol Med. 2021 Aug;135:104596. Mohiyuddin A, Basharat A, Ghani U, Peter V, Abbas S, Naeem OB, et al. Breast tumor detection and classification in mammogram images using modified YOLOv5 network. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jan;2022:1359019. Dimauro G, Ciprandi G, Deperte F, Girardi F, Ladisa E, Latrofa S, et al. Nasal cytology with deep learning techniques. Int J Med Inform. 2019 Feb;122:13–9. Ikeda K, Oboshi W, Hashimoto Y, Komene T, Yamaguchi Y, Sato S, et al. Characterizing the effect of processing technique and solution type on cytomorphology using liquid-based cytology. Acta Cytol. 2022 Jan;66(1):55–60. Hussain E, Mahanta LB, Das CR, Choudhury M, Chowdhury M. A shape context fully convolutional neural network for segmentation and classification of cervical nuclei in pap smear images. Artif Intell Med. 2020 Jul;107:101897. Wang CW, Liou YA, Lin YJ, Chang CC, Chu PH, Lee YC, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted fast screening cervical high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis and treatment planning. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug;11(1):16244. Lin H, Chen H, Wang X, Wang Q, Wang L, Heng PA. Dual-path network with synergistic grouping loss and evidence driven risk stratification for whole slide cervical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2021 Apr;69:101955. Gonzalez D, Dietz RL, Pantanowitz L. Feasibility of a deep learning algorithm to distinguish large cell neuroendocrine from small cell lung carcinoma in cytology specimens. Cytopathology. 2020 Sep;31(5):426–31. Teramoto A, Tsukamoto T, Kiriyama Y, Fujita H. Automated classification of lung cancer types from cytological images using deep convolutional neural networks. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4067832. Su F, Sun Y, Hu Y, Yuan P, Wang X, Wang Q, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning system for ascites cytopathology interpretation. Gastric Cancer. 2020 Nov;23(6):1041–50. Zhang Z, Fu X, Liu J, Huang Z, Liu N, Fang F, et al. Developing a machine learning algorithm for identifying abnormal urothelial cells: a feasibility study. Acta Cytol. 2021 Oct;65(4):335–41. Nojima S, Terayama K, Shimoura S, Hijiki S, Nonomura N, Morii E, et al. A deep learning system to diagnose the malignant potential of urothelial carcinoma cells in cytology specimens. Cancer Cytopathol. 2021 Dec;129(12):984–95. Lin YJ, Chao TK, Khalil MA, Lee YC, Hong DZ, Wu JJ, et al. Deep learning fast screening approach on cytological whole slides for thyroid cancer diagnosis. Cancer. 2021 Aug;13(15):3891. Elsheikh TM, Kirkpatrick JL, Wu HH. Comparison of ThinPrep and Cytospin preparations in the evaluation of exfoliative cytology specimens. Cancer. 2006 Jun;108(3):144–9. Hoda RS. Non-gynecologic cytology on liquid-based preparations: a morphologic review of facts and artifacts. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007 Oct;35(10):621–34. Michael CW, McConnel J, Pecott J, Afify AM, Al-Khafaji B. Comparison of ThinPrep and TriPath PREP liquid-based preparations in nongynecologic specimens: a pilot study. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001 Sep;25(3):177–84. Toyonaga Y, Yamazaki K, Koyama Y, Yamada M, Ishida Y. A modified direct-smear processing technique employing two-step centrifugation/fixation is useful for detecting high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Acta Cytol. 2017 Nov;61(6):447–54. Okuda C, Kyotake A, Nakamura A, Itoh T, Kamoshida S, Ohsaki H. Quantitative cytomorphological comparison of SurePath and ThinPrep liquid-based cytology using high-grade urothelial carcinoma cells. Cytopathology. 2021 Sep;32(5):654–9. Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Received: April 25, 2022
Accepted: July 10, 2022
Published online: September 06, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 4
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0001-5547 (Print)
eISSN: 1938-2650 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ACY

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.