Semin intervent Radiol 2022; 39(03): 334-337
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1751285
Mohammed Hashim Mirza
1 Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Health, Chicago, Illinois
,
Tara Gill
1 Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Health, Chicago, Illinois
,
Ketan Y. Shah
1 Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Health, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was not supported by any funding.Radial artery access for endovascular arterial interventions is becoming an increasingly common choice for a variety of procedures performed in the interventional radiology suite. Prior studies performed on patients undergoing coronary angiograms have demonstrated decreased vascular and bleeding complications, along with improved survival, in patients who underwent transradial access over those who underwent transfemoral access.[1] Other potential advantages of transradial access include improved patient comfort, lack of need for an implanted closure device, and increased technical ease to access to some visceral and pelvic arteries due to their downward sloping origins.
However, there are also potential complications of transradial access, including radial artery occlusion (RAO).[1] [2] RAO is most often asymptomatic but may less frequently present with symptoms requiring urgent intervention. Ulnar artery occlusion after radial artery access is a less often described complication. Herein, the authors present a case of transradial access which was complicated by both radial and ulnar thrombosis resulting in acute limb ischemia.
Publication HistoryArticle published online:
31 August 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
留言 (0)