Hauck WW, Tozer TN, Anderson S, Bois FY. Considerations in the attainment of steady state: aggregate vs. individual assessment. Pharm Res. 1998;15(11):1796–8.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Greenblatt DJ. Elimination half-life of drugs: value and limitations. Annu Rev Med. 1985;36(1):421–7.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Perrier D, Mayersohn M. Noncompartmental determination of the steady-state volume of distribution for any mode of administration. J Pharm Sci. 1982;71(3):372–3.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Jusko WJ, Gibaldi M. Effects of change in elimination on various parameters of the two-compartment open model. J Pharm Sci. 1972;61(8):1270–3.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Berezhkovskiy LM. On the accuracy of a one-compartment approach for determination of drug terminal half-life. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102(7):2082–4.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Benet LZ, Galeazzi RL. Noncompartmental determination of the steady-state volume of distribution. J Pharm Sci. 1979;68(8):1071–4.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Jeong Y-S, Kim M-S, Chung S-J. Determination of the number of tissue groups of kinetically distinct transit time in whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models I: Theoretical consideration of bottom-up approach of lumping tissues in whole-body PBPK. AAPS J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-022-00732-y.

Jeong Y-S, Kim M-S, Chung S-J. Determination of the number of tissue groups of kinetically distinct transit time in whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models II: Practical application of tissue lumping theories for pharmacokinetics of various compounds. AAPS J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-022-00733-x.

Cao Y, Jusko WJ. Applications of minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2012;39(6):711–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-012-9280-2.

CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Browne ET. On the separation property of the roots of the secular equation. Am J Math. 1930;52(4):843–50.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lombardo F, Berellini G, Obach RS. Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 1352 drug compounds. Drug Metab Dispos. 2018;46(11):1466–77.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Jeong Y-S, Yim C-S, Ryu H-M, Noh C-K, Song Y-K, Chung S-J. Estimation of the minimum permeability coefficient in rats for perfusion-limited tissue distribution in whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetics. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2017;115:1–17.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Kong AN, Jusko WJ. Definitions and applications of mean transit and residence times in reference to the two-compartment mammillary plasma clearance model. J Pharm Sci. 1988;77(2):157–65.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Sheppard CW, Householder A. The mathematical basis of the interpretation of tracer experiments in closed steady-state systems. J Appl Phys. 1951;22(4):510–20.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Vaughan DP, Dennis MJ. Number of exponential terms describing the solution of an N- compartmental mammillary model: vanishing exponentials. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1979;7(5):511–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062392.

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Monroy-Loperena R. A note on the analytical solution of cubic equations of state in process simulation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51(19):6972–6.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Poulin P, Theil FP. Prediction of pharmacokinetics prior to in vivo studies. II. Generic physiologically based pharmacokinetic models of drug disposition. J Pharm Sci. 2002;91(5):1358–70.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Rodgers T, Leahy D, Rowland M. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling 1: predicting the tissue distribution of moderate-to-strong bases. J Pharm Sci. 2005;94(6):1259–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.20322.

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rodgers T, Rowland M. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling 2: predicting the tissue distribution of acids, very weak bases, neutrals and zwitterions. J Pharm Sci. 2006;95(6):1238–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.20502.

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Poulin P, Theil FP. Prediction of pharmacokinetics prior to in vivo studies. 1. Mechanism-based prediction of volume of distribution. J Pharm Sci. 2002;91(1):129–56.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Lobell M, Sivarajah V. In silico prediction of aqueous solubility, human plasma protein binding and volume of distribution of compounds from calculated pKa and AlogP98 values. Mol Diversity. 2003;7(1):69–87.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Uchimura T, Kato M, Saito T, Kinoshita H. Prediction of human blood-to-plasma drug concentration ratio. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2010;31(5-6):286–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdd.711.

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Davies B, Morris T. Physiological parameters in laboratory animals and humans. Pharm Res. 1993;10(7):1093–5.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Faulkner J, McGibney D, Chasseaud L, Perry J, Taylor I. The pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in healthy volunteers after single intravenous and oral doses and after 14 repeated oral doses given once daily. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;22(1):21–5.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Rashid T, Martin U, Clarke H, Waller D, Renwick A, George C. Factors affecting the absolute bioavailability of nifedipine. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;40(1):51–8.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Edgar B, Regårdh C, Johnsson G, Johansson L, Lundborg P, Löfberg I, et al. Felodipine kinetics in healthy men. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985;38(2):205–11.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Carrara V, Porchet H, Dayer P. Influence of input rates on (±)-isradipine haemodynamics and concentration-effect relationship in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;46(1):29–33.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Ericsson H, Bredberg U, Eriksson U, Jolin-Mellgård Å, Nordlander M, Regårdh CG. Pharmacokinetics and arteriovenous differences in clevidipine concentration following a short-and a long-term intravenous infusion in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(4):993–1001.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

D’Argenio DZ, Schumitzky A, Wang X. ADAPT 5 user’s guide: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic systems analysis software. Los Angeles, CA: Biomedical Simulations Resource; 2009.

Google Scholar 

Øie S, Tozer TN. Effect of altered plasma protein binding on apparent volume of distribution. J Pharm Sci. 1979;68(9):1203–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jusko WJ, Li X. Assessment of the Kochak-Benet equation for hepatic clearance for the parallel-tube model: relevance of classic clearance concepts in PK and PBPK. AAPS J. 2022;24(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-021-00656-z.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jeong Y-S, Jusko WJ. Consideration of fractional distribution parameter fd in the Chen and Gross method for tissue-to-plasma partition coefficients: comparison of several methods. Pharm Res. 2022;39(3):463–79.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Berezhkovskiy LM. Prediction of drug terminal half-life and terminal volume of distribution after intravenous dosing based on drug clearance, steady-state volume of distribution, and physiological parameters of the body. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102(2):761–71.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Jeong Y-S, Jusko WJ. Meta-assessment of metformin absorption and disposition pharmacokinetics in nine species. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14(6):545.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Wesolowski CA, Wanasundara SN, Babyn PS, Alcorn J. Comparison of the gamma-Pareto convolution with conventional methods of characterising metformin pharmacokinetics in dogs. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2020;47(1):19–45.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Assmus F, Houston JB, Galetin A. Incorporation of lysosomal sequestration in the mechanistic model for prediction of tissue distribution of basic drugs. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017;109:419–30.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Trapp S, Rosania GR, Horobin RW, Kornhuber J. Quantitative modeling of selective lysosomal targeting for drug design. Eur Biophys J. 2008;37(8):1317.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar