Fixation-related fMRI analysis reveals the neural basis of parafoveal processing in self-paced reading of Chinese words

Baccino T, Manunta Y (2005) Eye-fixation-related potentials: insight into parafoveal processing. J Psychophysiol 19(3):204–215. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.19.3.204

Article  Google Scholar 

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Article  Google Scholar 

Beijing Language Institute Publisher (1986) Modern Chinese word frequency dictionary (in Chinese). Beijing Language Institute Publisher, Beijing

Google Scholar 

Carreiras M, Armstrong BC, Perea M, Frost R (2014) The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends Cognit Sci 18(2):90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005

Article  Google Scholar 

Degno F, Loberg O, Zang C, Zhang M, Donnelly N, Liversedge SP (2019) Parafoveal previews and lexical frequency in natural reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials. J Exp Psychol Gen 148(3):453–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000494

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dimigen O, Kliegl R, Sommer W (2012) Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials. Neuroimage 62(1):381–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.006

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Drieghe D (2011) Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements during reading. In: Liversedge SP, Gilchrist ID, Everling S (eds) The Oxford handbook of eye movements. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 839–855

Google Scholar 

Drieghe D, Brysbaert M, Desmet T (2005) Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference? Vis Res 45(13):1693–1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.010

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Engbert R, Nuthmann A, Richter EM, Kliegl R (2005) SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychol Rev 112(4):777–813. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Glezer LS, Jiang X, Riesenhuber M (2009) Evidence for highly selective neuronal tuning to whole words in the “visual word form area.” Neuron 62(2):199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.017

CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Henderson JM, Ferreira F (1990) Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 16(3):417–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.417

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Henderson JM, Choi W, Luke SG, Desai RH (2015) Neural correlates of fixation duration in natural reading: evidence from fixation-related fMRI. Neuroimage 119:390–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.072

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hsu CT, Clariana R, Schloss B, Li P (2019) Neurocognitive signatures of naturalistic reading of scientific texts: a fixation-related fMRI study. Sci Rep 9(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47176-7

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Hutzler F, Braun M, Võ MLH, Engl V, Hofmann M, Dambacher M, Leder H, Jacobs AM (2007) Welcome to the real world: validating fixation-related brain potentials for ecologically valid settings. Brain Res 1172:124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.07.025

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hyönä J (2011) Foveal and parafoveal processing during reading. In: Liversedge SP, Gilchrist ID, Everling S (eds) The Oxford handbook of eye movements. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 819–838

Google Scholar 

Hyönä J, Bertram R (2004) Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words during reading? Eur J Cogn Psychol 16(1–2):104–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000132

Article  Google Scholar 

Inhoff AW (1990) Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: The role of letter and word units. Acta Psychol 73(3):281–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(90)90027-D

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Inhoff AW, Radach R, Starr M, Greenberg S (2000) Allocation of visuo-spatial attention and saccade programming during reading. In: Kennedy A, Radach R, Heller D, Pynte J (eds) Reading as a perceptual process. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 221–246

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Kennedy A, Pynte J (2005) Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vis Res 45(2):153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.037

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kennedy A, Pynte J, Ducrot S (2002) Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Q J Exp Psychol Section A 55(4):1307–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000071

Article  Google Scholar 

Kliegl R, Masson ME, Richter EM (2010) A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Vis Cogn 18(5):655–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280902986058

Article  Google Scholar 

Kliegl R, Nuthmann A, Engbert R (2006) Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. J Exp Psychol Gen 135(1):12–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.12

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kornrumpf B, Niefind F, Sommer W, Dimigen O (2016) Neural correlates of word recognition: a systematic comparison of natural reading and rapid serial visual presentation. J Cogn Neurosci 28(9):1374–1391. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00977

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kretzschmar F, Schlesewsky M, Staub A (2015) Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 41(6):1648–1662. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000128

Article  Google Scholar 

Li N, Niefind F, Wang S, Sommer W, Dimigen O (2015) Parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 52(10):1361–1374. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12502

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li X, Huang L, Yao P, Hyönä J (2022) Universal and specific reading mechanisms across different writing systems. Nat Rev Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00022-6

Article  Google Scholar 

López-Peréz PJ, Dampuré J, Hernández-Cabrera JA, Barber HA (2016) Semantic parafoveal-on-foveal effects and preview benefits in reading: evidence from fixation related potentials. Brain Lang 162:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.07.009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mechelli A, Friston KJ, Price CJ (2000) The effects of presentation rate during word and pseudoword reading: a comparison of PET and fMRI. J Cognitive Neurosci 12(Supplement 2):145–156. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900564000

Article  Google Scholar 

Niefind F, Dimigen O (2016) Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: a combined eye tracking and EEG study. Psychophysiology 53(12):1784–1798. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12765

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pallier C, Devauchelle AD, Dehaene S (2011) Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(6):2522–2527. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018711108

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pan Y, Frisson S, Jensen O (2021) Neural evidence for lexical parafoveal processing. Nat Commun 12(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25571-x

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Pynte J, Kennedy A, Ducrot S (2004) The influence of parafoveal typographical errors on eye movements in reading. Eur J Cogn Psychol 16(1–2):178–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000169

Article  Google Scholar 

Rayner K (1975) The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cogn Psychol 7(1):65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5

Article  Google Scholar 

Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull 124(3):372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rayner K, McConkie GW, Ehrlich S (1978) Eye movements and integrating information across fixations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 4(4):529–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.529

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reichle ED, Pollatsek A, Rayner K (2006) E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cogn Syst Res 7(1):4–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.002

Article  Google Scholar 

Richlan F, Gagl B, Hawelka S, Braun M, Schurz M, Kronbichler M, Hutzler F (2014) Fixation-related fMRI analysis in the domain of reading research: using self-paced eye movements as markers for hemodynamic brain responses during visual letter string processing. Cerebr Cortex 24(10):2647–2656. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht117

Article  Google Scholar 

Risse S, Kliegl R (2012) Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 38(4):1026–1042. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027735

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Risse S, Kliegl R (2014) Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 40(2):653–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034997

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roelke A, Vorstius C, Radach R, Hofmann MJ (2020) Fixation-related NIRS indexes retinotopic occipital processing of parafoveal preview during natural reading. Neuroimage 215:116823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116823

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schotter ER, Angele B, Rayner K (2012) Parafoveal processing in reading. Atten Percept Psychophys 74(1):5–35. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schotter ER, Reichle ED, Rayner K (2014) Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial-attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and N+ 2 preview effects. Vis Cogn 22(3–4):309–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.873508

Article  Google Scholar 

Schuster S, Hawelka S, Hutzler F, Kronbichler M, Richlan F (2016) Words in context: the effects of length, frequency, and predictability on brain responses during natural reading. Cerebr Cortex 26(10):3889–3904. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw184

Article  Google Scholar 

Schroyens W, Vitu F, Brysbaert M, d’Ydewalle G (1999) Eye movement control during reading: Foveal load and parafoveal processing. Q J Exp Psychol 52(4):1021–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755859

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Simola J, Holmqvist K, Lindgren M (2009) Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials. Brain Lang 111(2):101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif