Kumalo HM, Bhakat S, Soliman ME (2015) Theory and applications of covalent docking in drug discovery: merits and pitfalls. Molecules 20(2):1984–2000
PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
Baillie TA (2016) Targeted covalent inhibitors for drug design. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55(43):13408–13421
Scarpino A, Ferenczy GG, Keserű GM (2020) Covalent docking in drug discovery: Scope and limitations. Curr. Pharm, Des
Wan X, Yang T, Cuesta A, Pang X, Balius TE, Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK, Taunton J (2020) Discovery of lysine-targeted eif4e inhibitors through covalent docking. JACS 142(11):4960–4964
Chowdhury SR, Kennedy S, Zhu K, Mishra R, Chuong P, Nguyen A-U, Kathman SG, Statsyuk AV (2019) Discovery of covalent enzyme inhibitors using virtual docking of covalent fragments. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 29(1):36–39
Shraga A, Olshvang E, Davidzohn N, Khoshkenar P, Germain N, Shurrush K, Carvalho S, Avram L, Albeck S, Unger T et al (2019) Covalent docking identifies a potent and selective mkk7 inhibitor. Cell Chem. Biol. 26(1):98–108
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J (2004) Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat. Rev. Drug 3(11):935–949
Yuriev E, Agostino M, Ramsland PA (2011) Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review. J. Mol. Regonit. 24(2):149–164
Taylor RD, Jewsbury PJ, Essex JW (2002) A review of protein-small molecule docking methods. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 16(3):151–166
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
London N, Miller RM, Krishnan S, Uchida K, Irwin JJ, Eidam O, Gibold L, Cimermančič P, Bonnet R, Shoichet BK et al (2014) Covalent docking of large libraries for the discovery of chemical probes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10(12):1066–1072
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R (1997) Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 267(3):727–748
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC (1995) Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J. Mol. Biol. 245(1):43–53
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Hartshorn MJ, Murray CW, Taylor RD (2003) Improved protein-ligand docking using gold. Proteins 52(4):609–623
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ (2009) Autodock4 and autodocktools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 30(16):2785–2791
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Bianco G, Forli S, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ (2016) Covalent docking using autodock: Two-point attractor and flexible side chain methods. Protein Sci. 25(1):295–301
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Zhu K, Borrelli KW, Greenwood JR, Day T, Abel R, Farid RS, Harder E (2014) Docking covalent inhibitors: a parameter free approach to pose prediction and scoring. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 54(7):1932–1940
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Toledo Warshaviak D, Golan G, Borrelli KW, Zhu K, Kalid O (2014) Structure-based virtual screening approach for discovery of covalently bound ligands. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 54(7):1941–1950
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Corbeil CR, Englebienne P, Moitessier N (2007) Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 1. development and validation of fitted 1.0. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47(2):435–449
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Abagyan R, Totrov M, Kuznetsov D (1994) Icm–a new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J. Comput. Chem. 15(5):488–506
Vilar S, Cozza G, Moro S (2008) Medicinal chemistry and the molecular operating environment (moe): application of qsar and molecular docking to drug discovery. Curr. Topics Med. Chem. 8(18):1555–1572
Scarpino A, Ferenczy GG, Keserű GM (2018) Comparative evaluation of covalent docking tools. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58(7):1441–1458
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Wu G, Robertson DH, Brooks Charles LIII, Vieth M (2003) Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of cdocker - a charmm-based md docking algorithm. J. Comput. Chem. 24(13):1549–1562
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK (2005) Zinc- a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45(1):177–182
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Irwin JJ, Sterling T, Mysinger MM, Bolstad ES, Coleman RG (2012) Zinc: a free tool to discover chemistry for biology. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52(7):1757–1768
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Ouyang X, Zhou S, Su CTT, Ge Z, Li R, Kwoh CK (2013) Covalentdock: automated covalent docking with parameterized covalent linkage energy estimation and molecular geometry constraints. J. Comput. Chem. 34(4):326–336
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Sterling T, Irwin JJ (2015) Zinc 15-ligand discovery for everyone. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55(11):2324–2337
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Liu T, Lin Y, Wen X, Jorissen RN, Gilson MK (2007) Bindingdb: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand binding affinities. Nucleic Acids Res. 35(1):198–201
Inc CCG (2016) Molecular operating environment (MOE). Chemical Computing Group Inc. 1010 Sherbooke St. West, Suite# 910, Montreal \(\ldots\)
Landrum G (2013) RDKit: A software suite for cheminformatics, computational chemistry, and predictive modeling. Academic Press, USA
Riniker S, Landrum GA (2015) Better informed distance geometry: using what we know to improve conformation generation. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55(12):2562–2574
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Wang S, Witek J, Landrum GA, Riniker S (2020) Improving conformer generation for small rings and macrocycles based on distance geometry and experimental torsional-angle preferences. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60(4):2044–2058
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Vanommeslaeghe K, MacKerell AD Jr (2012) Automation of the charmm general force field (cgenff) i: bond perception and atom typing. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52(12):3144–3154
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Vanommeslaeghe K, Raman EP, MacKerell AD Jr (2012) Automation of the charmm general force field (cgenff) ii: assignment of bonded parameters and partial atomic charges. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52(12):3155–3168
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Feig M, Karanicolas J, Brooks Charles LIII (2004) Mmtsb tool set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology. J. Mol. Graph 22(5):377–395
Vanommeslaeghe K, Hatcher E, Acharya C, Kundu S, Zhong S, Shim J, Darian E, Guvench O, Lopes P, Vorobyov I et al (2010) Charmm general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the charmm all-atom additive biological force fields. J. Comput. Chem. 31(4):671–690
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brooks BR, Brooks Charles LIII, Mackerell AD Jr, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, Won Y, Archontis G, Bartels C, Boresch S et al (2009) Charmm: the biomolecular simulation program. J. Comput. Chem. 30(10):1545–1614
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Ding X, Wu Y, Wang Y, Vilseck JZ, Brooks Charles LIII (2020) Accelerated cdocker with gpus, parallel simulated annealing, and fast fourier transforms. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16(6):3910–3919
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Gagnon JK, Law SM, Brooks Charles LIII (2016) Flexible CDOCKER: Development and application of a pseudo-explicit structure-based docking method within charmm. J. Comput. Chem. 37(8):753–762
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Wong T-T (2015) Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation. Pattern Recognit. 48(9):2839–2846
Luo YL (2021) Mechanism-based and computational-driven covalent drug design. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61(11):5307–5311
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Li A, Sun H, Du L, Wu X, Cao J, You Q, Li Y (2014) Discovery of novel covalent proteasome inhibitors through a combination of pharmacophore screening, covalent docking, and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Model. 20(11):1–13
留言 (0)