Incidence, dynamics and recurrences of reverse cleavage in aneuploid, mosaic and euploid blastocysts, and its relationship with embryo quality

Corachan A, Pellicer N, Pellicer A, Ferrero H. Novel therapeutic targets to improve IVF outcomes in endometriosis patients: a review and future prospects. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27:923–72.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Capalbo A, Hoffmann ER, Cimadomo D, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Human female meiosis revised: new insights into the mechanisms of chromosome segregation and aneuploidies from advanced genomics and time-lapse imaging. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:706–22.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Zaninovic N, Irani M, Meseguer M. Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy? Fertil Steril. 2017;108:722–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Revelli A, Canosa S, Carosso A, Filippini C, Paschero C, Gennarelli G, Delle Piane L, Benedetto C. Impact of the addition of early embryo viability assessment to morphological evaluation on the accuracy of embryo selection on day 3 or day 5: a retrospective analysis. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12:73.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yang Q, Zhu L, Wang M, Huang B, Li Z, Hu J, Xi Q, Liu J, Jin L. Analysis of maturation dynamics and developmental competence of in vitro matured oocytes under time-lapse monitoring. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;19:183.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Huang B, Zheng S, Ma B, Yang Y, Zhang S, Jin L. Using deep learning to predict the outcome of live birth from more than 10,000 embryo data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:36.

Article  Google Scholar 

Babayev E, Feinberg EC. Embryo through the lens: from time-lapse cinematography to artificial intelligence. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:342–3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ma BX, Zhang H, Jin L, Huang B. Neonatal outcomes of embryos cultured in a time-lapse incubation system: an analysis of more than 15,000 fresh transfer cycles. Reprod Sci. 2022;29:1524–30.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Besser AG, Mounts EL, Grifo JA. Evidence-based management of preimplantation chromosomal mosaicism: lessons from the clinic. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:1220–4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lal A, Roudebush WE, Chosed RJ. Embryo Biopsy can offer more information than just ploidy status. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:78.

Article  Google Scholar 

Aizer A, Harel-Inbar N, Shani H, Orvieto R. Can expelled cells/debris from a developing embryo be used for PGT? J Ovarian Res. 2021;14:104.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Lou H, Li N, Guan Y, Zhang Y, Hao D, Cui S. Association between morphologic grading and implantation rate of Euploid blastocyst. J Ovarian Res. 2021;14:18.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Huang B, Tan W, Li Z, Jin L. An artificial intelligence model (euploid prediction algorithm) can predict embryo ploidy status based on time-lapse data. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;19:185.

Article  Google Scholar 

Giovanni C, Amy B, Cristina L, Andrea B, Simon F, Darren G, et al. Plasticity of the human preimplantation embryo: developmental dogmas, variations on themes and self-correction. Human Reprod Update. 2021;27:848–65.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shao Y, Li J, Lu J, Li H, Zhu Y, Jiang W, Yan J. Clinical outcomes of Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) application in couples with chromosomal inversion, a study in the Chinese Han population. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020;18:79.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

McCollin A, Swann RL, Summers MC, Handyside AH, Ottolini CS. Abnormal cleavage and developmental arrest of human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63:103651.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lagalla C, Tarozzi N, Sciajno R, Wells D, Di SM, Nadalini M, Distratis V, Borini A. Embryos with morphokinetic abnormalities may develop into euploid blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34:137–46.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Yin B, Zhang H, Xie J, Wei Y, Zhang C, Meng L. Validation of preimplantation genetic tests for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with DNA from spent culture media (SCM): concordance assessment and implication. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;19:41.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Liu Y, Chapple V, Roberts P, Matson P. Prevalence, consequence, and significance of reverse cleavage by human embryos viewed with the use of the Embryoscope time-lapse video system. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1295–1300):e1292.

Google Scholar 

Balakier H, Cabaca O, Bouman D, Shewchuk AB, Laskin C, Squire JA. Spontaneous blastomere fusion after freezing and thawing of early human embryos leads to polyploidy and chromosomal mosaicism. Human Reprod. 2000;15:2404–10.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Barrie A, Homburg R, McDowell G, Brown J, Kingsland C, Troup S. Preliminary investigation of the prevalence and implantation potential of abnormal embryonic phenotypes assessed using time-lapse imaging. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34:455–62.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang J, Tao W, Liu H, Yu G, Li M, Ma S, et al. Morphokinetic parameters from a time-lapse monitoring system cannot accurately predict the ploidy of embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:1173–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rienzi L, Capalbo A, Stoppa M, Romano S, Maggiulli R, Albricci L, Scarica C, Farcomeni A, Vajta G, Ubaldi FM. No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poor-prognosis patients: a longitudinal cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30:57–66.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Hickman CF, Campbell A, Duffy S, Fishel S. Reverse cleavage: Its significance with regards to human embryo morhpokinetics, ploidy and stimulation protocol. Human Reprod. 2012;27:ii103–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Quera M, Florensa M, Esbert M. Frequency and impact on embryo development of reverse cleavage in human embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28:S14–S14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Huang B, Hu D, Qian K, Ai J, Li Y, Jin L, Zhu G, Zhang H. Is frozen embryo transfer cycle associated with a significantly lower incidence of ectopic pregnancy? An analysis of more than 30,000 cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1345–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1155–8.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Ciray HN, Campbell A, Agerholm IE, Aguilar J, Chamayou S, Esbert M, Sayed S. Group fTT-LU: proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2650–60.

Article  Google Scholar 

Desai N, Goldberg JM, Austin C, Falcone T. Are cleavage anomalies, multinucleation, or specific cell cycle kinetics observed with time-lapse imaging predictive of embryo developmental capacity or ploidy? Fertil Steril. 2018;109:665–74.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fragouli E, Wells D, Delhanty JD. Chromosome abnormalities in the human oocyte. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2011;133:107–18.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Munne S, Cohen J. Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:842–55.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Chaplia OV, Gontar JV, Bilko NM. Preimplantation development of human embryos with numerical chromosome abnormalities in vitro. Tsitol Genet. 2015;49:51–60.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang ST, Shi JX, Gong F, Zhang SP, Lu CF, Tan K, Leng LZ, Hao M, He H, Gu YF, et al. Cleavage pattern predicts developmental potential of day 3 human embryos produced by IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30:625–34.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Somfai T, Inaba Y, Aikawa Y, Ohtake M, Imai K. Relationship between the length of cell cycles, cleavage pattern and developmental competence in bovine embryos generated by in vitro fertilization or parthenogenesis. J Reprod Dev. 2010;56:200–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nagai H, Mai O, Nagai Y, Sakuraba Y, Sugimura S. Abnormal cleavage is involved in the self-correction of bovine preimplantation embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;562:76–82.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Kaser DJ, Racowsky C. Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:617–31.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen AA, Tan L, Suraj V, Reijo Pera R, Shen S. Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1035–43.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Chamayou S, Patrizio P, Storaci G, Tomaselli V, Guglielmino A. The use of morphokinetic parameters to select all embryos with full capacity to implant. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:703–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif